You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In ARROW-6478, we switched back to jemallox 4.x to fix a large performance regression in micro-benchmarks which appeared when bumping the vendored jemalloc version to 5.2.0.
Since then, the issue was discussed with the jemalloc maintainers and we found out that customizing some options allowed regaining all (or most) of the performance on micro-benchmarks with 5.2.x.
In ARROW-6478, we switched back to jemallox 4.x to fix a large performance regression in micro-benchmarks which appeared when bumping the vendored jemalloc version to 5.2.0.
Since then, the issue was discussed with the jemalloc maintainers and we found out that customizing some options allowed regaining all (or most) of the performance on micro-benchmarks with 5.2.x.
Reporter: Antoine Pitrou / @pitrou
Assignee: Antoine Pitrou / @pitrou
PRs and other links:
Note: This issue was originally created as ARROW-6549. Please see the migration documentation for further details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: