-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
Improving Docker modules #379
Comments
@cc @danihodovic Following up on our discussions on IRC this morning I created this issue |
Also CC @dariko @jwitko @kassiansun @tbouvet who are module_utils/docker_common.py maintainers and active (co-)authors of various |
Hi team, I am currently working on a healthcheck feature(ansible/ansible#46772) for |
Here's a list of all docker modules / plugins / module_utils with a list of active and inactive maintainers. The module_utils and connection plugin maintainers were a result of a query some time ago who wants to be notified about PRs/issues for them (#44693, #45052). These seemed to be the active maintainers and interested persons at that time :) The classification into active/inactive is mostly over the last couple of months (i.e. since this summer). I listed everyone as active I've noticed reacting/reviewing/... something docker related. docker_container
docker_image_facts
docker_image
docker_login
docker_network
docker_secret
docker_service
docker_stack
docker_swarm
docker_swarm_service docker_volume
module_utils/docker_common.py
lib/ansible/plugins/connection/docker.py
|
BTW, here's a PR (adding integration tests for docker_network) which needs some help to get merged: ansible/ansible#46137 |
And something useful for finding PRs and issues:
|
Maybe something about the original question by @gundalow :)
I think that's a great idea! Especially since currently it's a PITA to add/update tests for modules where no maintainer is active; namespace maintainers (i.e. maintainers of other docker_* modules) count as any random other person, and so getting anything merged can take forever. Having some active people as maintainers for all docker_* modules (in form of team_docker) would simplify that a lot.
Canonical first candidates are @dariko @jwitko @kassiansun @tbouvet (and me), as we are already on the docker_common / docker connection module maintainer list :) Then, @akshay196 and @danihodovic have expressed interest. Some more potential candidates: @DBendit (#35370), @ushuz (#38792) And maybe @agronholm is still around as well?
Having integration tests for most things is a good start. For docker_container and docker_volume, they already helped me finding several options which were not behaving as advertised... And then there's the open list of issues and PRs. I tried to go through most docker_* PRs and give some basic feedback or ask if people are still around (if someone else didn't already do that some time ago). |
BOTMETA updated to define |
Great work everybody. You can see the impact by going to http://dash.tannerjc.net/graph enter
|
More to do, though this issue is done. |
Moving to #408 |
Issue to track ideas for docker modules.
May not need a full working group around Ansible & Docker, though there are some people doing good stuff and others wondering how to help.
team_docker
?team_docker
?Currently we have the following in BOTMETA.yml
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: