Skip to content

fix(select): consider value changes via arrow keys on closed select as user actions #5112

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 13, 2017

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Jun 13, 2017

Currently, the user changing the md-select value using the arrow keys on a closed select won't mark the interaction as isUserInput in the option's selection event. These changes correct the behavior.

Fixes #5084.

…s user actions

Currently, the user changing the `md-select` value using the arrow keys on a closed select won't mark the interaction as `isUserInput` in the option's selection event. These change s correct the behavior.

Fixes angular#5084.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jun 13, 2017
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import {
FloatPlaceholderType,
MD_PLACEHOLDER_GLOBAL_OPTIONS
} from '../core/placeholder/placeholder-options';
import 'rxjs/add/operator/map';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that we are trying to move away from this syntax, can you refactor to use the explicit symbol?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, but I would rather do them all the same time when redoing #2652.

@kara kara assigned crisbeto and unassigned kara Jun 13, 2017
@crisbeto
Copy link
Member Author

@kara could you take another look?

@crisbeto crisbeto assigned kara and unassigned crisbeto Jun 13, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@kara kara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kara kara removed their assignment Jun 13, 2017
@kara kara added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels Jun 13, 2017
@kara kara merged commit 73aa43e into angular:master Jun 13, 2017
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

isUserInput == false when cycling through closed select
3 participants