Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TODO Features #69

Open
Kyle-Kyle opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

TODO Features #69

Kyle-Kyle opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Kyle-Kyle
Copy link
Collaborator

Kyle-Kyle commented Jan 30, 2024

handle gadgets like

[ins] In [2]: chain.print_payload_code()
chain = b""
chain += p32(0x809d9f7)	# mov eax, dword ptr [esp + 4]; ret 0xc
chain += p32(0x1010101)
chain += p32(0x0)
chain += p32(0xf5f5f5f5)

The issue is that this gadget requires another pop gadget to function correctly. But angrop currently does not support this.
Should be easy enough by adding a special "gadget value" without interfering with the gadget effect

change how angrop works fundamentally to get rid of the assumption of each gadget transition performs similar to a ret

@Kyle-Kyle Kyle-Kyle self-assigned this Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant