Feature Request: Show CPU Core Count in Summary

[maieredv-manuel]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In the Summary the CPU Type is shown, but saadly not the Core Count - sure, on a physical Machine you can search after the CPU Type, but on a VM there are virtual CPU Cores, so you also can have a i7-9700K with only 4 Cores on a VM.

Describe the solution you'd like
Show the CPU Core Count on the Summary

Describe alternatives you've considered
Actually ive run two Scripts:
one for the Cores: wmic cpu get NumberOfCores
and one for the Logical Cores (Threads): wmic cpu get NumberOfLogicalProcessors
Both scripts are running automaticaly once a day and pushes the answers to Custom Fields.
Its OK, but it would be nicer if these infos are in one Line with the CPU, RAM and so on.

[wh1te909]

Like this?

[wh1te909]

will be in next release

[maieredv-manuel]

Thank you! 🙂

[vithusel]

I've just updated to the latest release. It seems this feature is only available for Windows machines. Is there any plan to integrate this into Linux as well? Thinking of users who are using VPS and therefore it shows the real CPU instead of what is actually allocated to the VM.

[wh1te909]

yes will try to get it in the next release

[P6g9YHK6]

Microsoft licencing works off number of sockets on devices can we please also have another /xS for the numbers of processor on the device ?

[dinger1986]

Microsoft licencing works off number of sockets on devices can we please also have another /xS for the numbers of processor on the device ?

its already there, if its more than 1 it shows as 2 x or whatever

[P6g9YHK6]

Microsoft licencing works off number of sockets on devices can we please also have another /xS for the numbers of processor on the device ?

its already there, if its more than 1 it shows as 2 x or whatever

yes you are right i had the missconception that it was the core count due to the fact that some people built some VM's on a lot more than 2 socket

[vithusel]

@silversword411 this should stay open. wh1te909 mentioned he would get the Linux portion of this completed for next release in response to my previous query higher up ☺️

[silversword411]

Missed that, thought it was already done 🙂