-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hotfix release needed - Issue with latest rxjs release candidate #178
Comments
Awesome! Thanks. Fix released as |
This does not fix anything, because you are using ^ again... lol |
This has been fixed because we're no longer using Unfortunately Node decided to break symlinks as of this PR: nodejs/node#8749 (comment) This means package managers that make heavy use of symlinked dependencies won't work in newer versions of Node anymore. This includes PNPM and Yarn. |
To follow up, this is actually a bigger issue which would need to be addressed by using a different installation strategy that doesn't rely on symlinks. |
Let me understand this!? Doesn't this remove all the performance benefit of IED? I suggest you enable |
No, but we need to move away from symlinks. I'm not happy about this either and I've been trying to prevent this change in Node from the start. In fact, the issue addressing this is currently one of the most-commented on issues on the Node issue tracker. The fundamental problem is that Node used to identify required modules by their real path, rather by the path of their symlink (it currently still does). Eventually the decision was made to use the path of the symlink for some rather obscure reasons. After this broke all kinds of packages (not just package managers like ied and pnpm), the PR was eventually reverted. To allow people to use the "new" behaviour, a new flag was added. Edit: I just noticed this is completely unrelated to your issue and that I haven't slept for quite some time. So don't get too confused about my above comment. |
I think it is fine that it is on a flag for now. With enough time we will be able to prove how awesome is the concept of a shared storage for packages! I did not see any plans about deprecating However, even if they plan to do it, they will have to do it as a breaking change, so it'll be not sooner than in version 8. Hence we have like a year to make yarn/pnpm popular enough to be taken into account by the Node.js team. That's why I'd really like to collaborate with you guys to maybe merge pnpm and yarn or have some shared core or specs... to unite forces so to say |
Well, I don't think yarn and ied are going to merge anytime soon. That being said, I'm definitely open to the idea of merging pnpm into ied or vice versa. After all, pnpm started out as a fork of ied! So why not go back to the roots? ☀️ |
haha, I've meant merging pnpm and ied. |
Hello,
there is an issue with "[email protected]" that was released a day ago. This is going to break all IED released since 2.0.0 until 2.3.3. I suggest to release a hotfix as soon as possible. It is not a good idea to use a beta in combination with ^ in the version number - I hope someone learns a lesson from that :-)
Error:
Cannot find module 'rxjs/operator/distinctKey'
Broken build:
https://travis-ci.org/redaxmedia/redaxscript-download-sync/builds/173742057
Temporary solution is to install the earlier version of rxjs:
Fixed build:
https://travis-ci.org/redaxmedia/redaxscript-download-sync/builds/173776343
Solution for package.json:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: