Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schedule a research methodology collaboration hour (how to do research on Google Scholar, etc.) #64

Closed
kallewesterling opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kallewesterling
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@kallewesterling kallewesterling converted this from a draft issue Nov 20, 2023
@kallewesterling
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@f-rower adding you here as I think you were the one who spoke to this in our meeting. Not sure if it's something we want to pursue, so feel free to administer (or close) this issue as you see fit :D

@dingaaling
Copy link
Collaborator

An initial question on this @f-rower or any who have a method for this! Do you have a "place" you go to to store/organise your literature back log?

@aranas
Copy link
Collaborator

aranas commented Nov 29, 2023

I understand you don't mean a reference manager like mendeley or zotero, where you could in principle create a dedicated folder, but specifically how to have an efficient the back log? I find that my literature backlogs usually become graveyards. I've now started to attach links to readings directly with notes on the project I think they'd be relevant for (in obsidian). This way I am more likely to re-discover a paper in context than going through a daunting list that is growing faster than I can read.

@dingaaling
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the clarifying qs, @aranas! Your method sounds great, but do you think it would work as a team resource where our "in context" spaces may be different? Criteria I have in mind are:

  • Shared space for RAM team to view/collaboratively take notes on relevant articles
  • Organised by different RAM focus areas (e.g. Open Source sustainability, participatory methods)
  • (And I really like your point of) some structure enabling rediscovery (avoiding long list)

For example, I quite like what Ruth did with the clim-recal lit review, but Google Sheets it is essentially a long list as well

@f-rower
Copy link
Collaborator

f-rower commented Nov 30, 2023

@dingaaling here is my two cents on this topic:

I have used Zotero relatively successfully for storing and organising literature backlogs, and maximising rediscovery.

Zotero is quite powerful in the sense that you can save documents, website snapshots, and journal papers alike within your folder. To each of these, you can assign tags and write rich text notes, which is really helpful for information recall and understanding the relevance of the paper to your query. One of my favourite items is that you can "tag" related content to each item in your database, which I have found very helpful for cross-referencing text.

I know it's a reference manager, but I also think Zotero can very easily be repurposed as a knowledge management and information distribution tool with that system. Also, Zotero is open source, which is great. The only downside is that free cloud storage is limited to 300Mb of free storage, after which you have to pay $20 a year to upgrade to 2 GB

My suggested idea would be to have a shared RAM Zotero account where we keep our literature.

@dingaaling dingaaling moved this from Backlog to Todo in RAM Dec 4, 2023
@dingaaling
Copy link
Collaborator

Scheduled for 19 January 10AM

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in RAM Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants