Skip to content

Conversation

@atchernych
Copy link
Contributor

@atchernych atchernych commented Jul 25, 2025

Overview:

Details:

Where should the reviewer start?

Related Issues: (use one of the action keywords Closes / Fixes / Resolves / Relates to)

  • closes GitHub issue: #xxx

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the documentation index to revise and reorganize example and guide references.
    • Updated example descriptions and replaced certain examples with new ones, including "LLM Serving with VLLM" and "Multinode with SGLang."
    • Changed and simplified example descriptions and updated links to new backend component documentation paths.
    • Updated guide links and removed the Python API entry from the API section.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The documentation index was updated to revise and reorganize example and guide references. Example descriptions and links were updated to point to backend component directories, some examples were renamed or replaced, and certain entries were removed or simplified. The Python API entry was also removed from the API section.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/index.rst Updated example and guide references, revised descriptions, replaced/renamed examples, removed API entry, reorganized hidden examples toctree.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Docs Index
    participant Backend Component Docs

    User->>Docs Index: Access documentation index
    Docs Index-->>User: Show updated example and guide references
    User->>Backend Component Docs: Follow link to backend component example
    Backend Component Docs-->>User: Display specific backend example documentation
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

A hop through docs, a tidy-up spree,
Examples renamed for clarity!
Backend links now lead the way,
Old guides and APIs hop away.
With every change, the docs grow bright—
A rabbit’s touch makes learning light! 🐇📚


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/index.rst (2)

52-52: Clarify “GPU-unaware” wording

“GPU-unaware” might be confusing to new readers (does it mean CPU-only or framework-agnostic?). Consider rephrasing to something like “runs entirely on a single GPU-agnostic worker” to avoid ambiguity.


66-70: TensorRT-LLM link consistency

Hidden toctree later references components/backends/trtllm/README.md, whereas this card points to /components/backends/trtllm (no extension). Aligning both to the same canonical file (e.g., README.md or index.rst) avoids duplicate pages and broken canonical links.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3094278 and 6530ef1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/index.rst (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
docs/index.rst (2)

Learnt from: PeaBrane
PR: #1409
File: examples/router_standalone/worker.py:171-186
Timestamp: 2025-06-08T08:30:45.126Z
Learning: Example code in the examples/ directory may intentionally use hard-coded values or simplified implementations that wouldn't be appropriate for production code, but are acceptable for demonstration and testing purposes.

Learnt from: julienmancuso
PR: #2012
File: deploy/cloud/helm/crds/templates/nvidia.com_dynamocomponentdeployments.yaml:92-98
Timestamp: 2025-07-18T16:04:31.771Z
Learning: CRD schemas in files like deploy/cloud/helm/crds/templates/*.yaml are auto-generated from Kubernetes library upgrades and should not be manually modified as changes would be overwritten during regeneration.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build and Test - vllm
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/index.rst (3)

60-65: Cross-check SGLang multinode doc path

The path /components/backends/sglang/docs/multinode-examples mixes a docs/ subdir with a filename that lacks an extension. Ensure that either:

  1. multinode-examples.rst/.md exists, or
  2. an index.rst in that folder provides the landing page.

Otherwise the link will 404 in built docs.


113-113: Ensure new Helm README gets built

deploy/helm/README.md is now surfaced in the docs build; confirm that conf.py includes *.md via myst_parser (or similar) and that this path is inside source/ or added via sys.path – otherwise Sphinx will omit it.


135-137: Hidden examples toctree uses “.md” – verify build pipeline

Sphinx needs myst_parser enabled and the files included in its search path; otherwise these .md entries will be skipped. Additionally, ensure the filenames are correct (multinode-examples.md vs folder index).

@atchernych atchernych enabled auto-merge (squash) July 25, 2025 18:04
@atchernych atchernych merged commit 24cb926 into main Jul 25, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@atchernych atchernych deleted the rst-cleanup branch July 25, 2025 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants