Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nice!! #524

Open
ema7569 opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Nice!! #524

ema7569 opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ema7569
Copy link

ema7569 commented Jun 13, 2023

This a cool and practical extension, but not very very clear :) I think a good improvement is to add a checkbox to select what wildcard to use in a file. By example, I have a wildcard file with 100 line in it and I don't want to generate all each time when I need to test a checkpoint. In the same manner, have a checkbox to set if a file must be multiplied or not in combinations. Because if I have 100 lines in one and 10 lines in another one I don't necessary need to have 1000 outputs. I need the option to chose the lines I want to use with a checkbox in the two lists and a checkbox if a list must use each combination of others lists. Thank.

@adieyal
Copy link
Owner

adieyal commented Jul 14, 2023

Have you tried to use nested wildcards? For example

# colours.txt
__red__
__blue__
# red.txt
Crimson
Cardinal red
Carmine
Apple red
# blue.txt
Light Sky Blue
Dodger Blue
Royal Blue
Medium Blue
Dark Blue

So, instead of a file with 100 lines in it, you can break it up into smaller chunks. Then if you want to run a test, you can either comment out the wildcards you don't want, or create a special wildcard file for testing.

Option 1: Comment out wildcards

# colours.txt
# __red__
__blue__

In this case you're only using the blue wildcards.

Option 2:, Create a test file

# test.txt
__blue__

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants