You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Kind i type.
Type c i.
Type f i -> i.
Type p i -> prop.
Type q i -> i -> prop.
Theorem t1 : true /\ true. search.
Theorem t2 : true /\ (forall x, p x). skip.
Theorem t3 : (forall x, p x) /\ (forall x y, q x y). skip.
Theorem t4 : (forall x y, q x y) -> c = f c. skip.
Theorem test : false.
apply 0 t1. % goal is unchanged!
apply 0 t2. % H1 : forall x, p x
apply 0 t3. % H2 : forall x, p x
% H3 : forall x y, q x y
apply 0 t4 to H3. % proof completed!
In all these cases we would have expected the structure of the applied theorems to be preserved in the hypotheses, not eagerly simplified using left-asynchronous rules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The following seems to violate the principle of least astonishment.
In all these cases we would have expected the structure of the applied theorems to be preserved in the hypotheses, not eagerly simplified using left-asynchronous rules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: