You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
This is related to #3. The pushback code doesn't take into account the fact that the ScrambleSuit IAT obfuscation code leaves data on incoming_'s read buffer when delaying IAT writes.
To be perfectly realistic applying pushback like this is more out of paranoia on my part so this isn't major, given that clients are expected to be less resource constrained than servers, tor's circuit level flow control should prevent catastrophic buffer growth, and no one should be using IAT obfuscation in the first place.
Yawning
changed the title
ScrambleSuit IAT obfuscation still will buffer lots of data.
ScrambleSuit IAT obfuscation still can buffer lots of data.
Mar 28, 2014
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This is related to #3. The pushback code doesn't take into account the fact that the ScrambleSuit IAT obfuscation code leaves data on incoming_'s read buffer when delaying IAT writes.
To be perfectly realistic applying pushback like this is more out of paranoia on my part so this isn't major, given that clients are expected to be less resource constrained than servers, tor's circuit level flow control should prevent catastrophic buffer growth, and no one should be using IAT obfuscation in the first place.
Revisit after #27 is done.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: