WinAmp isn't cool enough and violates TOS

[coatlessali]

can be fixed by #1099

[ErdbeerbaerLP]

+1

MIT License

Copyright (c) 2024 ErdbeerbaerLP

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person reading this comment, to deal with the comment without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the comment, and to permit persons to whom the comment is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the comment.

THE COMMENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE COMMENT OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE COMMENT.

[justingoldberg]

God will punish winamp devs for not writing this in holyc

The Winamp 2.25 source leak had more holy C and less C++

C 53.9%
C++ 42.0%
NSIS 1.2%
IDL 0.9%
Objective-C 0.6%
Assembly 0.5%
Other 0.9%

Versus whatever version this is:

C++ 57.6%
C 37.2%
NSIS 1.1%
HTML 0.7%
IDL 0.6%
Batchfile 0.3%
Other 2.5%