We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@osa noticed that in the rendered spec (2023-09-13 draft version), the binary encoding for recgroups is outdated (after #372) and inconsistent with the rest of the spec. Specifically:
0x31
0x4E
rectype
subtype
0x4F
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Indeed, thanks! PTAL at #435.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
@osa noticed that in the rendered spec (2023-09-13 draft version), the binary encoding for recgroups is outdated (after #372) and inconsistent with the rest of the spec. Specifically:
0x31
followed by a vector of sub types.",0x31
should be0x4E
.rectype
, the byte should be0x4E
(instead of 0x4F). (See https://webassembly.github.io/gc/core/appendix/index-types.html where it is correct.)subtype
, the first byte of the "sub final" encoding should be0x4F
(instead of 0x4E).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: