Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need a signed driver of the fixed WinPmem version #20

Open
rs-develop opened this issue Nov 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Need a signed driver of the fixed WinPmem version #20

rs-develop opened this issue Nov 6, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@rs-develop
Copy link

Hello,

is a time sheduled when a signed driver of the fixed WinPmem version will be available?

Thank you!

@scudette
Copy link
Contributor

scudette commented Nov 6, 2020

It is available in this repository and embedded in the rc2 from the releases.

@vivianezw
Copy link
Collaborator

Well, I have the feeling he meant "with all methods fixed, not just PTE". :)

The current code base is not a good candidate for signing, because some things are still on the todo list, mostly a more precise error feedback back to the usermodemode component to differentiate between VSM errors (pseudo errors) or real errors. Chance is that I don't find time before February - April (the deadline before Microsoft makes signing forever impossible). There is a chance that there will never be a fixed signed driver because it's, simply spoken, not important enough. ;-p

@scudette
Copy link
Contributor

scudette commented Nov 6, 2020

I dont see the benefit of differentiating between VSM errors and "real errors" (I dont actually know what a real error is and how to tell we had one :-).

I do not see the benefit in implementing 32 bit PTE remapping - on 32 bit systems existing APIs work sufficiently well (no patchguard anyway).

All the bug fixes are currently in the userspace code and they seem pretty minor (so far just better defaults and refusing to run in unsupported configurations like running the 32 bit binary on 64 bit systems). I am not planning on implementing any kernel mode code unless a bug arises.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants