-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
/
exercises_tactics.v
86 lines (57 loc) · 2.87 KB
/
exercises_tactics.v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
(** Exercise sheet for lecture 4: Tactics in Coq.
Written by Ralph Matthes (CNRS, IRIT, Univ. Toulouse, France).
*)
(** * Exercise 1
Formalize the following types in UniMath and construct elements for them interactively -
if they exist. Give a counter-example otherwise, i.e., give specific parameters and a
proof of the negation of the statement.
[[
1. A × (B + C) → A × B + A × C, given types A, B, C
2. (A → A) → (A → A), given type A (for extra credit, write down five elements of this type)
3. Id_nat (0, succ 0)
4. ∑ (A : Universe) (A → empty) → empty
5. ∏ (n : nat), ∑ (m : nat), Id_nat n (2 * m) + Id_nat n (2 * m + 1),
assuming you have got arithmetic
6. (∑ (x : A) B × P x) → B × ∑ (x : A) P x, given types A, B, and P : A → Universe
7. B → (B → A) → A, given types A and B
8. B → ∏ (A : Universe) (B → A) → A, given type B
9. (∏ (A : Universe) (B → A) → A) → B, given type B
]]
More precise instructions and hints:
1. Use [⨿] in place of the + and pay attention to operator precedence.
2. Write a function that provides different elements for any natural number argument,
not just five elements; for extra credits: state correctly that they are different -
for a good choice of [A]; for more extra credits: prove that they are different.
3. An auxiliary function may be helpful (a well-known trick).
4. The symbol for Sigma-types is [∑], not [Σ].
5. Same as 1; and there is need for module [UniMath.Foundations.NaturalNumbers], e.g.,
for Lemma [natpluscomm].
6.-9. no further particulars
*)
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.Preamble.
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.PartA.
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.NaturalNumbers.
(** * Exercise 2
Define two computable strict comparison operators for natural numbers based on the fact
that [m < n] iff [n - m <> 0] iff [(m+1) - n = 0]. Prove that the two operators are
equal (using function extensionality, i.e., [funextfunStatement] in the UniMath library).
It may be helpful to use the definitions of the exercises for lecture 2.
The following lemmas on substraction [sub] in the natural numbers may be
useful:
a) [sub n (S m) = pred (sub n m)]
b) [sub 0 n = 0]
c) [pred (sub 1 n) = 0]
d) [sub (S n) (S m) = sub n m]
*)
(** from exercises to Lecture 2: *)
Definition ifbool (A : UU) (x y : A) : bool -> A :=
bool_rect (λ _ : bool, A) x y.
Definition negbool : bool -> bool := ifbool bool false true.
Definition nat_rec (A : UU) (a : A) (f : nat -> A -> A) : nat -> A :=
nat_rect (λ _ : nat, A) a f.
Definition pred : nat -> nat := nat_rec nat 0 (fun x _ => x).
Definition is_zero : nat -> bool := nat_rec bool true (λ _ _, false).
Definition iter (A : UU) (a : A) (f : A → A) : nat → A :=
nat_rec A a (λ _ y, f y).
Notation "f ̂ n" := (λ x, iter _ x f n) (at level 10).
Definition sub (m n : nat) : nat := pred ̂ n m.