-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
/
weq_exercises.v
59 lines (44 loc) · 2.13 KB
/
weq_exercises.v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
(** *** Advanced exercise sheet for lecture 4: Tactics in Coq. *)
(** Some exercises about equivalences - recall from the course that associativity
for products of types is not available "on the nose", i.e., just with equality.
Exercises originally suggested by Benedikt Ahrens and Anders Mörtberg
(for UniMath school 2017) and elaborated by Ralph Matthes (CNRS, IRIT,
Univ. Toulouse, France)
*)
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.PartA.
Locate "≃". (** written in Agda mode as [\simeq] *)
Print weq.
Print isweq.
Print hfiber.
Section weqdef.
Variables X Y: UU.
Eval compute in (X ≃ Y).
(** there is a function [f] so that for given image [y] on can find the preimage [x] uniquely, but not only as element of [X] but even the pair consisting of the preimage and the proof that it is the preimage is unique. *)
End weqdef.
(** Prove that the identity function is an equivalence *)
Lemma idisweq (X : UU) : isweq (idfun X).
Abort.
(** Package this up as an equivalence *)
Definition idweq (X : UU) : X ≃ X.
Abort.
(** consider finding an alternative proof with [isweq_iso] that is extremely useful in the UniMath library *)
(** Prove that any map to empty is an equivalence *)
Lemma isweqtoempty {X : UU} (f : X -> ∅) : isweq f.
Abort.
(** Package this up as an equivalence *)
Definition weqtoempty {X : UU} (f : X -> ∅) : X ≃ ∅.
Abort.
(** Prove that the composition of equivalences is an equivalence.
This is rather difficult to do directly from the definition. Important lemmas
to reason on equality of pairs in a sigma type are given by [base_paths] and
[fiber_paths] that are elimination rules (that use given equality of pairs)
and [total2_paths2_f] that is an introduction rule allowing to establish an
equation between pairs. There, transport arises, but transport along the
identity path is always the identity, and this already computationally, which
means that [cbn] gets rid of it. *)
Theorem compisweq {X Y Z : UU} (f : X -> Y) (g : Y -> Z)
(isf : isweq f) (isg : isweq g) : isweq (g ∘ f).
Abort.
(** Package this up as an equivalence *)
Definition weqcomp {X Y Z : UU} (w1 : X ≃ Y) (w2 : Y ≃ Z) : X ≃ Z.
Abort.