You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are just too many cases where shacl sparql definitions do not have the right sh:prefixes. I suggest that the processor should issue a warning instead of erroring out. It should give the location of the violation as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, it was unfortunate that the SHACL spec is not using the prefixes from the context graph directly. Almost every user runs into that problem. In our product we have since introduced a flag that (by default) automatically uses the prefixes from the Jena graph. A similar flag could be added here to the open source version.
There are just too many cases where shacl sparql definitions do not have the right
sh:prefixes
. I suggest that the processor should issue a warning instead of erroring out. It should give the location of the violation as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: