-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 787
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
App.run_test()
is Incompatible with PyTest Fixtures
#4998
Comments
The root cause is that the fixture is created in one task, and the tests run in another task. This means that the context variables created by The Regardless, the context manager as a fixture approach is never going to work. I am looking in to a different mechanism to expose a pilot in a fixture. |
I wanted to post back here to point out a couple things. First, my original code example was flawed. I forgot to await the result of mount. I edited the code example in my original comment to be correct; it still replicates the error (but with a more sensible error message). Second, I've been researching this issue and as you're probably aware, there is a pretty lengthy ticket in pytest-asyncio's repository concerning the core issue; the summary is that they are aware of the issue but can't do much about it until at least the next release, due to how Python has changed the asyncio APIs. In the mean-time, there is a workaround in that ticket in this comment, which involves a custom event loop policy that ensure that all tasks created from pytest_asyncio always use a shared context. It's hacky and could potentially be unreliable, but it does solve the issue in the trivial example I originally posted. I've yet to attempt to port it to a more complex one, but I suspect it probably works at least in cases where the re-use of contexts itself doesn't cause additional issues. |
I've run into the same problem while bumping the textual version (we've been sitting on a Teardown fails in that way: tests/tui/test_transfer.py:131 (test_transfers_finalize_cart[True])
def finalizer() -> None:
"""Yield again, to finalize."""
async def async_finalizer() -> None:
try:
await gen_obj.__anext__()
except StopAsyncIteration:
pass
else:
msg = "Async generator fixture didn't stop."
msg += "Yield only once."
raise ValueError(msg)
> event_loop.run_until_complete(async_finalizer())
../../.pyenv/versions/workplace/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:296:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
../../.pyenv/versions/3.10.12/lib/python3.10/asyncio/base_events.py:649: in run_until_complete
return future.result()
../../.pyenv/versions/workplace/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pytest_asyncio/plugin.py:288: in async_finalizer
await gen_obj.__anext__()
tests/tui/conftest.py:134: in prepared_env
async with app.run_test() as pilot:
../../.pyenv/versions/3.10.12/lib/python3.10/contextlib.py:206: in __aexit__
await anext(self.gen)
clive/__private/ui/app.py:159: in run_test
async with super().run_test(
../../.pyenv/versions/3.10.12/lib/python3.10/contextlib.py:206: in __aexit__
await anext(self.gen)
../../.pyenv/versions/clive/lib/python3.10/site-packages/textual/app.py:1798: in run_test
with app._context():
../../.pyenv/versions/3.10.12/lib/python3.10/contextlib.py:142: in __exit__
next(self.gen)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
self = Clive(title='Clive (Quit)', classes={'-dark-mode'}, pseudo_classes={'dark', 'focus'})
@contextmanager
def _context(self) -> Generator[None, None, None]:
"""Context manager to set ContextVars."""
app_reset_token = active_app.set(self)
message_pump_reset_token = active_message_pump.set(self)
try:
yield
finally:
> active_message_pump.reset(message_pump_reset_token)
E ValueError: <Token var=<ContextVar name='active_message_pump' at 0x7f610ce55cb0> at 0x7f6108c1a5c0> was created in a different Context But in other tests, I can see the failure earlier. About the The mentioned workaround of
doesn't work for me as we're on |
Ah yes, I should have mentioned that only works on >= Python 3.11. Above the comment I linked (but on the same issue), there are workarounds that supposedly work for earlier Python versions (3.11 however deprecated some things so there was a new workaround needed for that version). I did not try the other workarounds (my code base requires 3.12); but it sounded like people had success with them. |
Hello, I'm experiencing the same error as @mzebrak, which only started happening after upgrading from 0.79.1 to 0.80.0, and it's still an issue. The problem seems to be related to the recent asyncio changes mentioned earlier. For reference, my tests were passing with the |
I can confirm backporting Task from 3.11 to 3.10 and overriding event_loop with additional shared context-vars logic worked for me on 3.10.12. |
Have you checked closed issues?
Yes
Issue
The
App.run_test()
function is incompatible with pytest fixtures. Consider the following code example:Running this
textual run
works fine; you can press ctrl + a and the TextArea widget appears. However, if you runpytest, the test fails because calling the action_add_widget() function raisedNoActiveAppError
.Environment:
I discussed this on a discord, and presumably there is a somewhat known incompatibility with pytest fixtures here. Moving the
async with app.run_test() as pilot:
line to within the test instead of using a fixture works fine for this case. However, I consider this a bug for a number of reasons.First, not using fixtures is impractical for some use cases. The inability to use fixtures, for example, precludes the ability to use a single app instance to run multiple tests. A practical use case where this might be useful, is consider a CLI-like FTP client. One might want to connect to an FTP server, run a number of commands on the same server as separate test, and then disconnect (eg. session fixture scope).
Additionally, this issue has a code smell that makes me suspect undefined behavior/race conditions. A number of workarounds all work to solve the issue for this use case, including:
async_with
statement to inside the testawait asyncio.sleep(0)
to the fixture right before theyield
However, not all of these workarounds work for all use cases; in fact the only one that has thus far proven reliable is moving the
async with
statement (and my sample size is still relatively small). It seems to me to be in part a timing issue, thus the concern that the workaround is concealing a bigger issue.Textual Diagnose Output
As far as I'm aware, since this only occurs with pytest, I can't do this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: