You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much, HunyuanVideo, for your excellent work! I am currently studying your paper, but there is one part I don’t quite understand and hope to get clarification on. In Section 4.1.1 "Training," it mentions:
“To improve the reconstruction of high-motion videos, we randomly choose a sampling interval from the range 1 ∼ 8 to sample frames evenly across video clips.”
What does this mean? Does it mean randomly sampling several segments from a long clip and then stitching them together as a sample? If so, wouldn't this lead to inconsistency in the subject?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your interest. Please note that the sampling interval is between 1 and 8, whereas the original videos typically have a relatively high fps (e.g., 25). Even in the sparsest sampling scenario (with a frame interval of 8), the adjacent frames are still within a comparatively close time interval, and thus the consistency will not be lost.
Thank you for your interest. Please note that the sampling interval is between 1 and 8, whereas the original videos typically have a relatively high fps (e.g., 25). Even in the sparsest sampling scenario (with a frame interval of 8), the adjacent frames are still within a comparatively close time interval, and thus the consistency will not be lost.
Thank you very much, HunyuanVideo, for your excellent work! I am currently studying your paper, but there is one part I don’t quite understand and hope to get clarification on. In Section 4.1.1 "Training," it mentions:
“To improve the reconstruction of high-motion videos, we randomly choose a sampling interval from the range 1 ∼ 8 to sample frames evenly across video clips.”
What does this mean? Does it mean randomly sampling several segments from a long clip and then stitching them together as a sample? If so, wouldn't this lead to inconsistency in the subject?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: