-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review Lasair broker module to ensure compatibility with upgraded service #620
Comments
From Manisha: |
Additionally, the link to Lasair website on the Lasair Query Form is broken. Should probably direct to https://lasair.readthedocs.io/en/main/core_functions/rest-api.html# |
Writing to check if there has been any progress with this issue or if there is something I could do to include other query criteria from Lasair into TOM. |
Hi @ms1228, I'm working on an audit of our broker functionality right now to make sure we are up to date and everything is functioning. Unfortunately, adding additional functionality such as more complex queries might be outside the scope of my current efforts, but hopefully we can address this soon. Right now, the only table we search is the There is a description of how to use the query API and a full list of schema that can be used in the query. If this is something you'd like to take on, let me know and I can help, otherwise I'll keep you updated as we finish up our current projects. Thank you! |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
An email from the operators of the Lasair alert broker indicates that they are planning substantial upgrades.
Assiging this to Lindy in the first instance for triage. Please feel free to reassign as appropriate.
Describe the solution you'd like
We need to review the TOM Toolkit's lasair module and check that it remains compatible.
Additional context
Email from the Lasair team:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: