Define whether error handling complies with RFC 7807.

[itziweb]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The current version of the error handling of the TOMP API seems to be oriented towards RFC 7807 in terms of style. However, it is not clear from the documentation if it is based on the standard or if this is more of a coincidence.

Urgency

Minor
The work on version 2.0 would be an opportunity to check this. Aligning with RFC 7807 could improve interoperability and adherence to established standards.

Additional context

RFC 7807 is a widely adopted standard for error handling in APIs. Including a reference to it or aligning with it more closely could benefit the API's usability.

Describe the solution you'd like

A clear review and alignment of TOMP-API error handling with RFC 7807, or documentation on why deviations are necessary.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Maintaining the current structure but adding a note in the documentation about the deviations from RFC 7807.

Possible Implementation

For 2.0 - review the current error handling structure, compare it with RFC 7807, and adjust the fields as necessary to ensure compliance or provide clear documentation on the chosen approach.

[edwinvandenbelt]

Hey Roman, it is indeed RFC 7807 we're using. Although we added the errorcode-field. In v2.0 there will be an explicit reference to the RFC.