You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to see GIGWA supporting all these (optional/extra) minMaf, maxMaf, minMissingData, maxMissingData, minHeZ, and maxHeZ filtering parameters in the allele matrix search call. Just like what they did for the GA4GH /variants/search call.
If we agree on their usefulness from the application point of view, why not suggest having them in the BrAPI /search/allelematrix parameters?
I understand the service provider's argument that such parameters can put a huge computational load on the server side. Well, what will be the alternative option, the client application has nothing but extract the whole dataset, and then do the filtering at their side. This scenario implies more transfer data cost and fewer requests the server can manage because of the transfer time required for each!
I believe adding these filtering parameters can be a win-win situation for both server and client implementation in most production environments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to see GIGWA supporting all these (optional/extra) minMaf, maxMaf, minMissingData, maxMissingData, minHeZ, and maxHeZ filtering parameters in the allele matrix search call. Just like what they did for the GA4GH /variants/search call.
If we agree on their usefulness from the application point of view, why not suggest having them in the BrAPI /search/allelematrix parameters?
I understand the service provider's argument that such parameters can put a huge computational load on the server side. Well, what will be the alternative option, the client application has nothing but extract the whole dataset, and then do the filtering at their side. This scenario implies more transfer data cost and fewer requests the server can manage because of the transfer time required for each!
I believe adding these filtering parameters can be a win-win situation for both server and client implementation in most production environments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: