Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I think that would be great! I also tried to go down that path first by integrating Editor.js, but it proved tricky for a lot of reasons which I can go into later. Then I thought that at least having a nicer code editing experience would help a lot already even though it would only be useful to a subset of coders. And integrating Monaco proved to be way easier than trying to handle WYSIWYG non-destructively 😅 I think there was a discussion on Google Groups about this back then, I can try to find it later 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here's the whole Google Groups thread on a redesign of TiddlyWiki, which includes many of these ideas: https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/gX0o8j7Coa8/m/eMJBQKQrAwAJ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A friend of mine (and author of TidGi, @linonetwo) is developing a WYSIWYG editor for TW based on SlateJS, and has already implemented some of the features, which look cool (here). I think that's enough for the average user.
However, I don't think Monaco's work is redundant. There is still a need for a tool that directly edits wikitext for more advanced features (like using wikitext a lot to write interesting features); also Monaco can be used to edit Markdown, JSON, or other content.
So I think TW5 will eventually produce a solution that best allows a tiddler to be edited WYSIWYG and also edit its wikitext in chunks (using Monaco) to achieve content that would be difficult to achieve with a WYSIWYG editor.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions