Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add human feedback into long-term memory #1377

Closed
1 task done
FlyWieEinAirplane opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
1 task done

Add human feedback into long-term memory #1377

FlyWieEinAirplane opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@FlyWieEinAirplane
Copy link

Duplicates

  • I have searched the existing issues

Summary 💡

It could be beneficial, if human feedback could be persisted in long term memory.
I didn't fully think this through but there could be many instances where the operator gives feedback because the model misunderstood the task. After giving feedback, the context and feedback could be stored in long term memory to help AutoGPT make the right decision immediately next time, without the need to provide feedback again.

Note that this is most beneficial, if memory is persistent - as far as I understood, that is not the case right now(?)

Examples 🌈

I read in another issue that AutoGPT wanted to clone its own repo github.com/Torantulino/Auto-GPT but ended up finding and cloning GPT-2.
Human feedback could be: When I talk about AutoGPT i mean github.com/Torantulino/Auto-GPT.
On a future run, AutoGPt would know, that GPT-2 is not AutoGPT and would not make the same mistake again.

Motivation 🔦

autonomous learning of AutoGPT or at least learning from mistakes.

@normanlove222
Copy link

Not a bad idea at all. I mean, we are all thinking this

@Bigrussian8
Copy link

Ask Bing to help you with prompt engineering to help you with this problem. It doesn't fix the issue but it helps.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2023

This issue has automatically been marked as stale because it has not had any activity in the last 50 days. You can unstale it by commenting or removing the label. Otherwise, this issue will be closed in 10 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 6, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was closed automatically because it has been stale for 10 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants