Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
Hi @frack113, I think you should be careful with the shortening of some names. Think to all the new people coming in the sigma world, reading "pc" instead of "process_creation" won't be easy to grasp at first. For the more experienced, it can also be quite painful to read something like "lnx_pc_wrg_prv_mal_xxx_zzz" (voluntarily bad example), because the more we shorten things the more we want to continue shortening :) It's a little bit extreme but you get the point. My key argument here is that, we must keep the rule name intelligible and understadable at first sight. May be |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, "pc" is too short. I'd use this pattern category_os_type_etc.yml |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My bad for the end it "start pattern" + susp + "the continuation of the name". I have try to keep the logic in place. If is it ok, I will work on a PR. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello,
As now there are linux sysmon, laurel, agents with ETW... I would like to put some order in the name of rules.
The names are 70 characters long.
For process_creation, there are several patterns in the current folders.
I think like normalization :
Keep the start_pattern _susp_ end of the name file (ex win_susp_rclone_execution.yml)
file_event, network_connection are allready in win,lnx and macos too
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions