You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The fact that deployment rollout monitoring currently looks at all pods associated with that deployment instead of pods in the new ReplicaSet has caused several different bugs:
Deploys never succeed when there are evicted pods associated with the deployment, even though those pods are old (fixed another way)
Pod warnings get shown for pods that are being shut down, in the case where the last deploy was bad and the current one is actually succeeding (very confusing output)
Deploy success is delayed by waiting for all old pods to fully disappear
This false-positive deploy result is likely caused by this.Last poll before it "succeeded" was: (I now think it probably briefly became available before failing a probe, or something like that)
[KUBESTATUS] {"group":"Deployments","name":"jobs","status_string":"Waiting for rollout to finish: 0 of 1 updated replicas are available...","exists":true,"succeeded":true,"failed":false,"timed_out":false,"replicas":{"updatedReplicas":1,"replicas":1,"availableReplicas":1},"num_pods":1}
Related technical notes:
We are selecting related pods using an assumption that they are labelled with the deployment name. I believe this is a bad assumption that has flown under the radar so far because all our templates are labelled this way by convention. The new ReplicaSet version should not do this.
The fact that deployment rollout monitoring currently looks at all pods associated with that deployment instead of pods in the new ReplicaSet has caused several different bugs:
Deploys never succeed when there are evicted pods associated with the deployment, even though those pods are old(fixed another way)This false-positive deploy result is likely caused by this.Last poll before it "succeeded" was:(I now think it probably briefly became available before failing a probe, or something like that)Related technical notes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: