Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom data result doesn't seem to be very good #6

Open
cfcy-zch opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Custom data result doesn't seem to be very good #6

cfcy-zch opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@cfcy-zch
Copy link

Hi, thanks for your awesome work!
I ran the Penguin demo and it worked very well. Afterwards, I tried to split one of my power drill models and made corresponding modifications according to yaml file in the shapenetpart directory. After running it, the effect doesn't seem to be very good. Can you help me check if the running result is correct? How can I improve?
GSB185.yaml is:
dataset: faust
backend: satr+glip
backend_type: detection_based
dataset_dir: data/GSB185
satr:
gaussian_reweighting: true
face_smoothing: true
face_smoothing_n_ring: 5
camera:
n_views: 10
frontview_std: 4
frontview_center:

  • 3.14
  • 0.0
    render_res: 1024
    region_names: '[''grip'',''battery'',''chuck'']'
    object_class: power drill

command is: CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 python scripts/single_dataset_example.py -cfg configs/shapenetpart/GSB185.yaml -mesh_name GSB185_simple.obj -output_dir outputs/demo/GSB185
2024-07-29_22-31
2024-07-29_22-30_1
2024-07-29_22-30

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant