Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Idea / Request #2108

Closed
bmcgonag opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Idea / Request #2108

bmcgonag opened this issue Feb 2, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@bmcgonag
Copy link

bmcgonag commented Feb 2, 2016

Ability to assign roles / sub-groups with managers / admins only capable of modifying channels / groups / users within that sub-group.

A hierarchical structure to Users, Roles, Groups, and so on.

This creates the ability to host a single Rocket Chat instance across a large, diverse group where not all members / groups need to interact, but some do. Allows a Full admin to generate 'spaces' for smaller group breakdowns and assign an admin to oversee that group, or a few smaller groups only.

@garg
Copy link

garg commented Feb 2, 2016

Is this similar to the request for teams - #630 and #658 ?

@bmcgonag
Copy link
Author

bmcgonag commented Feb 2, 2016

So, checked those two links, and not sure. Would either of those options allow a sub-group and it's users to still access a globally (across all sub-groups) created channel for chat?

So, I'm in Group A, and you're in Group B. Both private groups. I can't chat in B, and you can't chat in A. But a full admin creates Channel G and makes it available to both Group A and B, and now you and I could chat in G.

Is this the concept of either of those? If, so, then yes that's my concept / idea, and we can close this one.

@marceloschmidt
Copy link
Member

Yes, this is what we plan on doing sometime in the future. Closing in favor of duplicate #658.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants