You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ability to assign roles / sub-groups with managers / admins only capable of modifying channels / groups / users within that sub-group.
A hierarchical structure to Users, Roles, Groups, and so on.
This creates the ability to host a single Rocket Chat instance across a large, diverse group where not all members / groups need to interact, but some do. Allows a Full admin to generate 'spaces' for smaller group breakdowns and assign an admin to oversee that group, or a few smaller groups only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So, checked those two links, and not sure. Would either of those options allow a sub-group and it's users to still access a globally (across all sub-groups) created channel for chat?
So, I'm in Group A, and you're in Group B. Both private groups. I can't chat in B, and you can't chat in A. But a full admin creates Channel G and makes it available to both Group A and B, and now you and I could chat in G.
Is this the concept of either of those? If, so, then yes that's my concept / idea, and we can close this one.
Ability to assign roles / sub-groups with managers / admins only capable of modifying channels / groups / users within that sub-group.
A hierarchical structure to Users, Roles, Groups, and so on.
This creates the ability to host a single Rocket Chat instance across a large, diverse group where not all members / groups need to interact, but some do. Allows a Full admin to generate 'spaces' for smaller group breakdowns and assign an admin to oversee that group, or a few smaller groups only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: