You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PCI: Support 64-bit bridge windows if we have 64-bit dma_addr_t
Aaron reported that a 32-bit x86 kernel with Physical Address Extension
(PAE) support complains about bridge prefetchable memory windows above 4GB:
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x380000000000-0x383fffffffff]
...
pci 0000:03:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x383fffc00000-0x383fffdfffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:03:00.0: reg 0x20: [mem 0x383fffe04000-0x383fffe07fff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:03:00.1: reg 0x10: [mem 0x383fffa00000-0x383fffbfffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:03:00.1: reg 0x20: [mem 0x383fffe00000-0x383fffe03fff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:00:02.2: PCI bridge to [bus 03-04]
pci 0000:00:02.2: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x1fff]
pci 0000:00:02.2: bridge window [mem 0x91900000-0x91cfffff]
pci 0000:00:02.2: can't handle 64-bit address space for bridge
In this kernel, unsigned long is 32 bits and dma_addr_t is 64 bits.
Previously we used "unsigned long" to hold the bridge window address. But
this is a bus address, so we should use dma_addr_t instead.
Use dma_addr_t to hold the bridge window base and limit.
The question of whether the CPU can actually *address* the window is
separate and depends on what the physical address space of the CPU is and
whether the host bridge does any address translation.
[bhelgaas: fix "shift count > width of type", changelog, stable tag]
Fixes: d56dbf5 ("PCI: Allocate 64-bit BARs above 4G when possible")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88131
Reported-by: Aaron Ma <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Aaron Ma <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected] # v3.14+
0 commit comments