Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cross validation endpoint implementation #3226

Closed
sorayabh opened this issue Apr 9, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Cross validation endpoint implementation #3226

sorayabh opened this issue Apr 9, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels
type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR

Comments

@sorayabh
Copy link

sorayabh commented Apr 9, 2019

Rasa version: 0.15.0a1

Python version: 3.6

Operating system (windows, osx, ...): osx

Issue: Enhancement : Cross validation endpoint implementation
I didn't find how to run cross validation directly through the server router API. If you think that this feature should be implemented, I would be happy to contribute.

Content of configuration file (config.yml):

Content of domain file (domain.yml) (if used & relevant):

@akelad
Copy link
Contributor

akelad commented Apr 10, 2019

Thanks for raising this issue, @ricwo will get back to you about it soon.

@ricwo
Copy link
Contributor

ricwo commented Apr 10, 2019

Hi @sorayabh, thanks for bringing this up. Adding cross-validation capabilities to the existing /intentEvaluation would be a nice addition. Looking forward to your contribution!

@akelad akelad added the type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR label Apr 11, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 3, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the status:stale label Feb 3, 2020
@tmbo tmbo removed the status:stale label Feb 3, 2020
@wochinge
Copy link
Contributor

closed by #7408

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:enhancement ✨ Additions of new features or changes to existing ones, should be doable in a single PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants