Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

modules.perl6.org should link each module name to the latest release url #261

Closed
tbrowder opened this issue Oct 10, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed
Labels
Meta Policy, request for comments.

Comments

@tbrowder
Copy link
Member

When there are entries to specific commits for a module in the META.list, the latest should be used for the url for that module in the generated modules list on modules.perl6.org.

@moritz
Copy link
Contributor

moritz commented Oct 10, 2016

What's the user experience like if we do that? Will the link be a tarball? If yes, then I don't think that's a good idea.

Do you have an example of how it would look like?

@tbrowder
Copy link
Member Author

tbrowder commented Oct 10, 2016

On Monday, October 10, 2016, Moritz Lenz [email protected] wrote:

What's the user experience like if we do that? Will the link be a tarball?
If yes, then I don't think that's a good idea.

Per ugexe's commnts, and my current understanding, the url would be to the
release commit tree on the master branch (or any other branch if
appropriate) so the module link on the modules.perl6.org would take the
clicker to that commit tree so he could see the actual released code.

Do you have an example of how it would look like?

I was waiting for confirmation from ugexe that it will work (he may have to
do a little code mod on the ecosystem). But I will update my module's
current master branch META6.json to show the link.
...

I have updated my module's META6.json in https://github.com/tbrowder/Net-IP-Lite-Perl6/ to point to the latest release code tree.

@JJ JJ added the Meta Policy, request for comments. label Jul 28, 2018
@JJ
Copy link
Contributor

JJ commented Feb 24, 2019

Could this be related to #433 ?

@tbrowder
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, let's close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Meta Policy, request for comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants