Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[✨] Add official Civet support to create-qwik package #49

Closed
danielbayley opened this issue Dec 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

[✨] Add official Civet support to create-qwik package #49

danielbayley opened this issue Dec 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
[STAGE-2] incomplete implementation Remove this label when implementation is complete [STAGE-2] not fully covered by tests yet Remove this label when tests are verified to cover the implementation [STAGE-2] unresolved discussions left Remove this label when all critical discussions are resolved on the issue [STAGE-3] docs changes not added yet Remove this label when the necessary documentation for the feature / change is added [STAGE-3] missing 2 reviews for RFC PRs Remove this label when at least 2 core team members reviewed and approved the RFC implementation

Comments

@danielbayley
Copy link

danielbayley commented Dec 16, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Forcing the use of TypeScript and JSX to be able to take full advantage of Qwik, for those less than enthused with that syntax can be alleviated by it’s compatibility with Civet, which I noticed you guys are sponsoring :)

Describe the solution you'd like

Add official Civet support as prompt option to the create-qwik initializer package… I suppose it should be an ecosystem/integration.

Describe alternatives you've considered

CoffeeScript -> TypeScript

Additional context

QwikDev/qwik#2878, DanielXMoore/Civet#858
@gioboa
Copy link
Member

gioboa commented Oct 14, 2024

We moved this issue to qwik-evolution repo to create a RFC discussion for this.
Here is our Qwik RFC process thanks.

@gioboa gioboa transferred this issue from QwikDev/qwik Oct 14, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In Progress (STAGE 2) in Qwik Evolution Oct 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added [STAGE-2] incomplete implementation Remove this label when implementation is complete [STAGE-2] not fully covered by tests yet Remove this label when tests are verified to cover the implementation [STAGE-2] unresolved discussions left Remove this label when all critical discussions are resolved on the issue [STAGE-3] docs changes not added yet Remove this label when the necessary documentation for the feature / change is added [STAGE-3] missing 2 reviews for RFC PRs Remove this label when at least 2 core team members reviewed and approved the RFC implementation labels Oct 14, 2024
@QwikDev QwikDev locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 14, 2024
@gioboa gioboa converted this issue into discussion #126 Oct 14, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress (STAGE 2) to Released as Stable (STAGE 5) in Qwik Evolution Oct 14, 2024
@shairez shairez removed this from Qwik Evolution Oct 15, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
[STAGE-2] incomplete implementation Remove this label when implementation is complete [STAGE-2] not fully covered by tests yet Remove this label when tests are verified to cover the implementation [STAGE-2] unresolved discussions left Remove this label when all critical discussions are resolved on the issue [STAGE-3] docs changes not added yet Remove this label when the necessary documentation for the feature / change is added [STAGE-3] missing 2 reviews for RFC PRs Remove this label when at least 2 core team members reviewed and approved the RFC implementation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@danielbayley @gioboa