The layout of expressions after UBOUND() and LBOUND() is wrong

[mkilgore]

See the forum post here

Basically, if you have syntax formatting on and you type this:

REDIM c$(1000)
idx = UBOUND(c$) - _HEIGHT - 125

The second line gets incorrectly transformed into this:

REDIM c$(1000)
idx = UBOUND(c$) - _HEIGHT (

It seems like UBOUND() and LBOUND() handling is the culprit, putting anything after the - results is basically the same kind of incorrect transformation.

This is another card that would benefit from #215, as it would allow us to add tests around these cases.

[SteveMcNeill]

This doesn't just affect _HEIGHT. It affects any automatically handled function with a single optional param after lbound/ubound. You can also rule out the REDIM statement and see the glitch with something as simple as:

print lBOUND(c) - _pixelsize - 125