You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to propose the addition of an option to select lxml as the parser for BeautifulSoup responses, instead of the current fixed default of html.parser.
It will improve parsing speed for large or complex documents.
I believe this enhancement would make webtest even more versatile and powerful for a wide range of testing scenarios. I am looking forward to your thoughts on this proposal and am happy to contribute to the discussion or assist with preliminary testing.
Thank you for considering my suggestion and for your ongoing efforts to improve the webtest library.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature Request
I would like to propose the addition of an option to select
lxml
as the parser for BeautifulSoup responses, instead of the current fixed default ofhtml.parser
.It will improve parsing speed for large or complex documents.
I believe this enhancement would make webtest even more versatile and powerful for a wide range of testing scenarios. I am looking forward to your thoughts on this proposal and am happy to contribute to the discussion or assist with preliminary testing.
Thank you for considering my suggestion and for your ongoing efforts to improve the webtest library.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: