Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ModelCheckpoint(save_on_train_epoch_end) #8389

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 13, 2021

Conversation

carmocca
Copy link
Contributor

@carmocca carmocca commented Jul 13, 2021

What does this PR do?

Adds ModelCheckpoint(save_on_train_epoch_end) which works just as EarlyStopping(check_on_train_epoch_end) and ModelPruning(prune_on_train_epoch_end)

The flag defaults to True if the Trainer(val_check_interval) flag is unchanged. This is because if you are running validation multiple times per training epoch, you probably want to save right after. Otherwise, saving on_train_epoch_end is the safer option as it is the last hook called so it's more likely the monitor will have been logged.

Part of #7724
Closes #6671

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes ? If yes, please list them.

If your workflow required running the ModelCheckpoint save exactly after validation ends, this will break it unless save_on_train_epoch_end=False is specified.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?

PR review

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

@carmocca carmocca added feature Is an improvement or enhancement priority: 0 High priority task labels Jul 13, 2021
@carmocca carmocca added this to the v1.4 milestone Jul 13, 2021
@carmocca carmocca self-assigned this Jul 13, 2021
@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Jul 13, 2021

Hello @carmocca! Thanks for updating this PR.

Line 306:13: W503 line break before binary operator

Comment last updated at 2021-07-13 14:16:08 UTC

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #8389 (101368d) into master (000fbe6) will decrease coverage by 1%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #8389   +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage      93%     92%   -1%     
======================================
  Files         216     216           
  Lines       14115   14123    +8     
======================================
- Hits        13087   13023   -64     
- Misses       1028    1100   +72     

Copy link
Contributor

@tchaton tchaton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGMT !

pytorch_lightning/callbacks/model_checkpoint.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/models/test_hooks.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@carmocca carmocca force-pushed the refactor/mc-save-on-train-epoch-end branch from 4aa95a6 to 277525a Compare July 13, 2021 14:15
@carmocca carmocca added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Jul 13, 2021
@carmocca carmocca enabled auto-merge (squash) July 13, 2021 14:16
@carmocca carmocca merged commit 321689f into master Jul 13, 2021
@carmocca carmocca deleted the refactor/mc-save-on-train-epoch-end branch July 13, 2021 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature Is an improvement or enhancement priority: 0 High priority task ready PRs ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants