Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix _module_available to detect horovod.torch properly #12377

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 28, 2022

Conversation

JoostvDoorn
Copy link
Contributor

@JoostvDoorn JoostvDoorn commented Mar 19, 2022

What does this PR do?

Fixes #12370, such that horovod.torch is again properly detected.

This PR simplifies the logic of the _module_available function. I think in general it's not a good idea to try to deviate too much from importlib when testing for module availability, if the specific logic of hasattr is necessary for any check it would be better to handle that case separately. I tried reproducing the error that first triggered this change in the torchmetrics repo Lightning-AI/torchmetrics#770 by testing _module_available("transformers.models.auto") and this didn't give me any problems, but a maintainer might be a better judge of this. I can replicate this code to that repo later.

Note I run horovod in develop mode not sure if that's related, but latest pypi version of horovod has a very restrictive pin on the pytorch lightning version.

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or internal minor changes/refactorings)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing make sure you have read Review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@awaelchli
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR @JoostvDoorn
I triggered CI, let's see what happens :)

@JoostvDoorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Some of the horovod tests are failing and seem to be skipped in master.

Copy link
Member

@Borda Borda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does it also work for any other modules?
we had the for loop there on purpose...

@JoostvDoorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

does it also work for any other modules? we had the for loop there on purpose...

I tested some manually, but I think this is a good point, so I added some tests in 0d79821 to confirm imports match with the flags allowing the CI to test for this. Let me know if there are any specific cases that need to be added to this, as the exact flags for which the loop is relevant in this repository isn't fully clear to me.

@JoostvDoorn JoostvDoorn mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2022
12 tasks
@awaelchli
Copy link
Contributor

@JoostvDoorn It looks like #12379 will have to be completed first, right? If you want, you can merge #12379 into this branch to see if both work together.

@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 23, 2022
@rohitgr7 rohitgr7 added this to the 1.6 milestone Mar 23, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@awaelchli awaelchli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@mergify mergify bot added the ready PRs ready to be merged label Mar 27, 2022
@Borda Borda requested review from Borda and four4fish March 28, 2022 07:22
@awaelchli awaelchli enabled auto-merge (squash) March 28, 2022 08:24
@awaelchli awaelchli merged commit abe795e into Lightning-AI:master Mar 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working ready PRs ready to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

_module_available does not correctly check child modules
6 participants