Document inferred name in Polymer() #530
Conversation
| <template> | ||
| <!-- shadow DOM here --> | ||
| </template> | ||
| <script>Polymer();</script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you should show this as:
Polymer({
...
});
otherwise, just use noscript
There was a problem hiding this comment.
At this point in the doc, we haven't introduced the proto-object yet... It is synonymous with noscript, true...
Hm. I originally had this section up right after the initial definition, so the parallel was really obvious. Let me think on that.
|
Ready to merge? |
|
Dude, aren't you on vacation? |
|
I lurk
|
|
@arthurevans Not on vaca anymore here: ready to merge? ; ) |
|
Checked with Arthur. We're going to wait on Scott to review before moving forward on this. Arthur says it'll be reviewed before the end of the week. |
|
Assigning this to Scott. Feet, meet fire. |
|
We've improved the core feature here. The name-less call |
More tweaks to "adding properties and methods" section.
arthurevans
force-pushed
the
inferred-name
branch
from
bb448e4
to
b426d8f
Compare
|
Git history is all messed up here. Rebased & resubmitted as #617. |
Fixes #351. Also removed the tag-name argument from many code excerpts on this page.
Also clarified (I hope) section on adding properties and methods.
Wording on both of these may be somewhat controversial, so @sjmiles, @sorvell, PTAL.