-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different logarithmic scale behavior when compared to Qwt #94
Comments
After a quick overview, still no clue. |
After some debugging, I confirm that everything works as expected in I found out that this is coming from commit 3cf995f (when margin is set to |
@nicoddemus : please confirm that it's fixed on your side. Should be 🤞 |
Yep, I can confirm it works great, thanks a lot for this! |
@nicoddemus : perfect! Let me know if you need a new release soon: that would be understandable considering this bug which could be quite annoying. |
A new release soon would be great, thanks! But no rush though. |
Hi folks,
We are having different results when using the logarithmic scale compared with
Qwt
.Qwt
PythonQwt
The original
Qwt
scale looks right, butPythonQwt
is not really logarithmic... any ideas what the problem might be? I suspect it might be related to the fact that nowPythonQwt
uses a better overall auto range calculation to give some room on each side of each axis (which looks much better in normal situations), but this extra room might not be playing well with the old logarithmic scaling code, but this is just a hunch.I did look at the
QwtLogScaleEngine.autoScale
method in comparison with the original, and everything seems well.Any hints/suggestions would be greatly appreciated! 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: