[Components] botcake #13985 #14748
[Components] botcake #13985 #14748
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new modules in the Botcake application for managing keywords and tools. The new actions include creating a keyword, updating a keyword, and retrieving tools. Each action is defined with metadata and an asynchronous Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/botcake/actions/create-keyword/create-keyword.mjs (1)
6-6: Enhance the action descriptionThe description should provide more context about what a "Keyword" represents in Botcake and its purpose.
Consider expanding the description to be more informative:
- description: "Create a new Keyword. [See the documentation](https://docs.botcake.io/english/api-reference#create-keyword)", + description: "Create a new Keyword in Botcake for automated response management. [See the documentation](https://docs.botcake.io/english/api-reference#create-keyword)",components/botcake/actions/get-tools/get-tools.mjs (1)
3-11: Consider enhancing the action description.While the description includes a documentation link, it would be helpful to include information about:
- The expected response format
- Any required permissions or prerequisites
- Example use cases
- description: "Get a list of tools associated with the specified page. [See the documentation](https://docs.botcake.io/english/api-reference#get-tools)", + description: "Get a list of tools associated with the specified page. Returns an array of tool objects containing details like ID, name, and configuration. [See the documentation](https://docs.botcake.io/english/api-reference#get-tools)",components/botcake/botcake.app.mjs (1)
36-49: Standardize URL construction to avoid double slashesThe
_baseUrl()method returns a URL with a trailing slash, and thepathparameters begin with a leading slash. This can result in URLs with double slashes (//). To ensure proper URL construction, consider removing the trailing slash from_baseUrl()or the leading slash frompath.Example diff to remove trailing slash from
_baseUrl():_baseUrl() { - return "https://botcake.io/api/public_api/v1/"; + return "https://botcake.io/api/public_api/v1"; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/botcake/actions/create-keyword/create-keyword.mjs(1 hunks)components/botcake/actions/get-tools/get-tools.mjs(1 hunks)components/botcake/actions/update-keyword/update-keyword.mjs(1 hunks)components/botcake/botcake.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/botcake/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/botcake/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The version increase from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features while maintaining backward compatibility.
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform version compatibility.
Let's ensure the specified version of @pipedream/platform is compatible with the current Pipedream environment.
✅ Verification successful
Version 3.0.3 of @pipedream/platform is compatible with the current codebase.
The specified version ^3.0.3 in botcake/package.json is aligned with the latest version (3.0.3) and matches the version used by many other recently updated components in the repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for @pipedream/platform version compatibility
# Expected: Version should align with other components in the repository
# Check other components' package.json files for @pipedream/platform versions
echo "Checking @pipedream/platform versions across components..."
fd package.json components/ -x grep -l "@pipedream/platform" {} \; -x jq -r '.dependencies["@pipedream/platform"]' {}
# Check if this is the recommended version for new components
echo "Checking latest @pipedream/platform version..."
npm view @pipedream/platform version
Length of output: 55806
components/botcake/actions/create-keyword/create-keyword.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify the app module exports
Let's verify that the imported app module exists and exports the required createKeyword method.
✅ Verification successful
Import statement is correctly implemented
The botcake.app.mjs module exists and properly exports the createKeyword method that is required by the action. The method is implemented as part of the app's methods object and makes authenticated API requests to the Botcake API endpoint.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the app module exists and exports createKeyword
# Expected: Find the createKeyword method definition in botcake.app.mjs
# Check if the app file exists and contains createKeyword method
ast-grep --pattern 'createKeyword($_) {
$$$
}' components/botcake/botcake.app.mjs
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the app file exists and see its content
cat components/botcake/botcake.app.mjs
# As a backup, let's also search for any createKeyword method using ripgrep
# which might catch it even if the AST pattern didn't match
rg "createKeyword" components/botcake/ -A 3
Length of output: 2786
components/botcake/actions/get-tools/get-tools.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM!
The import statement is clean and correctly references the app module.
13-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and input validation.
The current implementation lacks several important safeguards:
- No error handling for API failures
- No validation for the response structure
- Missing parameters for filtering tools (if supported by the API)
Consider implementing these improvements:
async run({ $ }) {
+ try {
const response = await this.app.getTools({
$,
});
+ if (!response?.data) {
+ throw new Error('Unexpected response format from Botcake API');
+ }
+
+ const toolCount = Array.isArray(response.data) ? response.data.length : 0;
$.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} tools`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve tools: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},Additionally, if the API supports filtering:
- Consider adding optional props for filtering (e.g., page ID, tool type)
- Pass these filters to the
getToolsmethod
Let's check if the API supports filtering:
✅ Verification successful
Looking at the implementation of getTools in botcake.app.mjs, I can see that it's a simple method that makes an API request to fetch tools for a specific page ID, and it doesn't support any additional filtering parameters. The method just accepts a generic args parameter which is spread into the request options. Let me generate the final response based on this finding.
Add error handling and response validation
The current implementation should include error handling and response validation, but filtering suggestions can be omitted as the API doesn't support additional parameters:
async run({ $ }) {
+ try {
const response = await this.app.getTools({
$,
});
+ if (!response?.data) {
+ throw new Error('Unexpected response format from Botcake API');
+ }
$.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} tools`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to retrieve tools: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if getTools method in app file supports filtering parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'getTools($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the getTools method implementation using ripgrep
rg "getTools" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 1448
components/botcake/actions/update-keyword/update-keyword.mjs (3)
1-8: LGTM! Verify the documentation link accessibility.
The module structure and metadata are well-defined. The naming convention and versioning are appropriate for a new component.
✅ Verification successful
Documentation link is accessible and valid
The documentation link is working correctly, returning a 200 HTTP status code from the Botcake documentation site.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the documentation link is accessible
curl -I https://docs.botcake.io/english/api-reference#update-keyword
Length of output: 2313
1-40: Verify integration with other Botcake components.
Since this is part of a larger Botcake integration, let's ensure consistency across components.
✅ Verification successful
Integration verification completed successfully
The implementation is consistent with the Botcake component architecture:
- The
updateKeywordaction correctly uses the method defined inbotcake.app.mjs - Props (
keywordIdandflowId) are properly defined in the app's propDefinitions - The action follows the same structure as other Botcake actions (create-keyword, get-tools)
- The API endpoint and authentication handling are implemented correctly in the app file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency across Botcake components
# Look for similar patterns in other Botcake actions
echo "Checking for consistent action structure..."
ast-grep --pattern $'export default {
key: "botcake-$_",
name: $_,
description: $_,
version: $_,
type: "action",
$$$
}'
# Check for updateKeyword method definition
echo "Checking for updateKeyword method definition..."
rg -A 5 "updateKeyword.*\{|\bassync updateKeyword" --type js
Length of output: 397
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the integration
# 1. Check for all Botcake action files
echo "Checking Botcake action files..."
fd "\.mjs$" components/botcake/actions
# 2. Check the app file for updateKeyword method
echo -e "\nChecking app file for updateKeyword method..."
cat components/botcake/botcake.app.mjs
# 3. Check for keyword-related prop definitions
echo -e "\nChecking for keyword-related prop definitions..."
rg "keywordId.*propDefinition|flowId.*propDefinition" --type js
Length of output: 2701
9-23: Consider adding more update fields for flexibility.
The current implementation only allows updating the flow_id. Consider adding more fields that might be useful for keyword updates (e.g., keyword name, status, etc.).
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
flowIdandkeywordIdto streamline user interactions.Bug Fixes
Documentation
These updates enhance the overall user experience by providing more robust keyword management capabilities.