[Components] liveswitch #13859 #14427
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple new modules and functionalities for managing conversations and contacts within the LiveSwitch application. It includes the creation of new actions for creating conversations, updating contacts, and creating contacts, along with enhancements to the main application file to support these actions. The changes also involve updates to the package configuration to reflect a new version and dependencies. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/liveswitch/actions/create-contect/create-contact.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider enhancing the documentation.The module structure follows Pipedream's component standards. While the documentation link is helpful, consider adding more details about required permissions or rate limits.
Add a note about any required LiveSwitch permissions or API rate limits that users should be aware of.
components/liveswitch/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs (1)
7-7: Consider starting with version 1.0.0Since this is a new component that will be released to production, it's recommended to start with version 1.0.0 instead of 0.0.1 to indicate it's ready for production use.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "1.0.0",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- components/liveswitch/actions/create-contect/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/liveswitch/actions/create-conversation/create-conversation.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/liveswitch/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/liveswitch/liveswitch.app.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/liveswitch/package.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/liveswitch/package.json (3)
15-17: Dependencies look appropriate.The @pipedream/platform dependency is correctly specified with a compatible version range. This is a standard requirement for Pipedream components.
12-14: Public access configuration is correct.The publishConfig with public access is appropriate for a Pipedream component.
3-3: Verify version bump aligns with semantic versioning.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 indicates new features. This aligns with the addition of contact and conversation management functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate
The version bump is justified by the addition of three new features:
create-contactcreate-conversationupdate-contactThese new actions represent significant functionality additions that warrant a minor version increment according to semantic versioning principles.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the scope of changes matches the minor version bump # Test: Look for new feature files mentioned in the AI summary echo "Verifying new feature files..." fd -e mjs "create-contact|create-conversation|update-contact" components/liveswitch/Length of output: 359
components/liveswitch/actions/create-conversation/create-conversation.mjs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement follows component structure.
26-32: Verify consistent API endpoint usage.Let's ensure the conversation creation endpoint is used consistently across the codebase.
#!/bin/bash # Search for other uses of createConversation echo "Checking createConversation usage..." rg -l "createConversation" --type js
3-23: Verify component version consistency.The component version should align with the overall package version strategy.
components/liveswitch/actions/create-contect/create-contact.mjs (2)
1-52: Verify architectural consistency with other LiveSwitch components.Let's ensure this component follows the same patterns as other LiveSwitch components.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent patterns across LiveSwitch components # Check component structure echo "Checking component structure..." fd -e mjs -e js . components/liveswitch/actions -x ast-grep --pattern $'export default { key: "liveswitch-$_", name: $_, description: $_, version: $_, type: "action", props: { $$$ }, async run({ $ }) { $$$ } }' # Check error handling patterns echo "Checking error handling patterns..." rg -A 5 "try.*catch.*throw" --type js components/liveswitch/
9-35: Verify required fields for contact creation.The implementation allows all fields (phone, firstName, lastName, email) to be optional. This might lead to the creation of contacts with insufficient information.
Let's check the LiveSwitch API documentation and existing implementations:
components/liveswitch/actions/update-contact/update-contact.mjs (1)
1-1: Verify app module integrationLet's verify that the required methods and prop definitions exist in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
App module integration is properly implemented ✅
The app module (
liveswitch.app.mjs) contains all the necessary components:
- The
updateContactmethod is properly implemented with the requiredcontactIdparameter- All required prop definitions are present:
contactId(with async options)phonefirstName(optional)lastName(optional)🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for updateContact method and required prop definitions in app module echo "Checking app module integration..." # Look for updateContact method ast-grep --pattern 'updateContact({ $, contactId, data })' # Look for prop definitions rg -A 2 'propDefinitions.*contactId|propDefinitions.*phone|propDefinitions.*firstName|propDefinitions.*lastName|propDefinitions.*email' components/liveswitch/liveswitch.app.mjsLength of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to verify the app module integration # First, let's check if the app module exists and see its content cat components/liveswitch/liveswitch.app.mjs # As a backup, let's also search for updateContact method with a more flexible pattern ast-grep --pattern 'updateContact' # And search for prop definitions with a more general pattern ast-grep --pattern 'propDefinitions = {'Length of output: 2757
components/liveswitch/liveswitch.app.mjs (1)
1-1: LGTM! Using platform's axios implementation.Following Pipedream's best practices by using the platform-provided axios instance.
| contactId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "contactId", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| message: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "message", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing props validation.
The contactId and message props could benefit from additional validation to ensure data quality.
Consider adding these validations:
contactId: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"contactId",
],
+ validation: {
+ required: true,
+ pattern: /^[a-zA-Z0-9-]+$/,
+ },
},
message: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"message",
],
+ validation: {
+ required: true,
+ maxLength: 1000,
+ },
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| contactId: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| app, | |
| "contactId", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| message: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| app, | |
| "message", | |
| ], | |
| }, | |
| contactId: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| app, | |
| "contactId", | |
| ], | |
| validation: { | |
| required: true, | |
| pattern: /^[a-zA-Z0-9-]+$/, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| message: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| app, | |
| "message", | |
| ], | |
| validation: { | |
| required: true, | |
| maxLength: 1000, | |
| }, | |
| }, |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createConversation({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| contactId: this.contactId, | ||
| message: this.message, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Conversation with ID: ${response.id}`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add explicit error handling and response validation.
While the current implementation works, it could be more robust with explicit error handling and response validation.
Consider enhancing the implementation:
async run({ $ }) {
+ if (!this.contactId || !this.message) {
+ throw new Error("Required parameters missing");
+ }
+
const response = await this.app.createConversation({
$,
data: {
contactId: this.contactId,
message: this.message,
},
});
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid response from LiveSwitch API");
+ }
+
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created Conversation with ID: ${response.id}`);
return response;
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.createConversation({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| contactId: this.contactId, | |
| message: this.message, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Conversation with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| if (!this.contactId || !this.message) { | |
| throw new Error("Required parameters missing"); | |
| } | |
| const response = await this.app.createConversation({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| contactId: this.contactId, | |
| message: this.message, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid response from LiveSwitch API"); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Conversation with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| phone: this.phone, | ||
| firstName: this.firstName, | ||
| lastName: this.lastName, | ||
| email: this.email, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and input validation.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- No error handling for failed API calls
- No input validation before the API call
- No type checking for response.id
- Potentially exposing sensitive information in the full response
Consider implementing these improvements:
async run({ $ }) {
+ // Validate required fields
+ const requiredFields = ['phone', 'email'];
+ const missingFields = requiredFields.filter(field => !this[field]);
+ if (missingFields.length > 0) {
+ throw new Error(`Missing required fields: ${missingFields.join(', ')}`);
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.createContact({
$,
data: {
phone: this.phone,
firstName: this.firstName,
lastName: this.lastName,
email: this.email,
},
});
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid response: missing contact ID');
+ }
+
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`);
- return response;
+ // Return only necessary fields
+ return {
+ id: response.id,
+ phone: response.phone,
+ email: response.email,
+ };
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| // Validate required fields | |
| const requiredFields = ['phone', 'email']; | |
| const missingFields = requiredFields.filter(field => !this[field]); | |
| if (missingFields.length > 0) { | |
| throw new Error(`Missing required fields: ${missingFields.join(', ')}`); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid response: missing contact ID'); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| // Return only necessary fields | |
| return { | |
| id: response.id, | |
| phone: response.phone, | |
| email: response.email, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.updateContact({ | ||
| $, | ||
| contactId: this.contactId, | ||
| data: { | ||
| phone: this.phone, | ||
| firstName: this.firstName, | ||
| lastName: this.lastName, | ||
| email: this.email, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated Contact with ID: ${this.contactId}`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and summary message
The current implementation could benefit from:
- Explicit error handling for API failures
- A more informative success message that includes the updated fields
async run({ $ }) {
+ const updateFields = {
+ phone: this.phone,
+ firstName: this.firstName,
+ lastName: this.lastName,
+ email: this.email,
+ };
+
+ const updatedFields = Object.entries(updateFields)
+ .filter(([, value]) => value !== undefined)
+ .map(([key]) => key)
+ .join(", ");
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.updateContact({
$,
contactId: this.contactId,
- data: {
- phone: this.phone,
- firstName: this.firstName,
- lastName: this.lastName,
- email: this.email,
- },
+ data: updateFields,
});
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated Contact with ID: ${this.contactId}`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated Contact ID ${this.contactId} - Updated fields: ${updatedFields}`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to update contact: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.updateContact({ | |
| $, | |
| contactId: this.contactId, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated Contact with ID: ${this.contactId}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const updateFields = { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }; | |
| const updatedFields = Object.entries(updateFields) | |
| .filter(([, value]) => value !== undefined) | |
| .map(([key]) => key) | |
| .join(", "); | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.updateContact({ | |
| $, | |
| contactId: this.contactId, | |
| data: updateFields, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully updated Contact ID ${this.contactId} - Updated fields: ${updatedFields}`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to update contact: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| props: { | ||
| app, | ||
| contactId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "contactId", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| phone: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "phone", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| firstName: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "firstName", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| lastName: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "lastName", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| email: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "email", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation to ensure at least one field is provided for update
Currently, the action allows submission without any fields to update, which could result in unnecessary API calls. Consider adding validation to ensure at least one field (phone, firstName, lastName, or email) is provided.
props: {
app,
contactId: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"contactId",
],
+ required: true,
},
phone: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"phone",
],
+ optional: true,
},
firstName: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"firstName",
],
+ optional: true,
},
lastName: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"lastName",
],
+ optional: true,
},
email: {
propDefinition: [
app,
"email",
],
+ optional: true,
},
},Then add validation in the run method:
async run({ $ }) {
+ const updateFields = {
+ phone: this.phone,
+ firstName: this.firstName,
+ lastName: this.lastName,
+ email: this.email,
+ };
+
+ if (!Object.values(updateFields).some(Boolean)) {
+ throw new Error("At least one field must be provided for update");
+ }
+
const response = await this.app.updateContact({
$,
contactId: this.contactId,
- data: {
- phone: this.phone,
- firstName: this.firstName,
- lastName: this.lastName,
- email: this.email,
- },
+ data: updateFields,
});Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| phone: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Phone", | ||
| description: "Contact's phone number, i.e.: `+1 407-982-1211`", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add phone number format validation.
The phone property should include format validation to ensure consistent phone number format.
phone: {
type: "string",
label: "Phone",
description: "Contact's phone number, i.e.: `+1 407-982-1211`",
+ pattern: "^\\+[1-9]\\d{1,14}$",
+ patternDescription: "Please enter the phone number in E.164 format (e.g., +14079821211)",
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| phone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Phone", | |
| description: "Contact's phone number, i.e.: `+1 407-982-1211`", | |
| }, | |
| phone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Phone", | |
| description: "Contact's phone number, i.e.: `+1 407-982-1211`", | |
| pattern: "^\\+[1-9]\\d{1,14}$", | |
| patternDescription: "Please enter the phone number in E.164 format (e.g., +14079821211)", | |
| }, |
| async getContacts(args = {}) { | ||
| return this._makeRequest({ | ||
| path: "/contacts", | ||
| params: { | ||
| page: 1, | ||
| pageSize: 100, | ||
| }, | ||
| ...args, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve response handling in getContacts.
The method should handle the response structure and return the contacts array.
async getContacts(args = {}) {
- return this._makeRequest({
+ const response = await this._makeRequest({
path: "/contacts",
params: {
page: 1,
pageSize: 100,
},
...args,
});
+ return response.data?.contacts || [];
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async getContacts(args = {}) { | |
| return this._makeRequest({ | |
| path: "/contacts", | |
| params: { | |
| page: 1, | |
| pageSize: 100, | |
| }, | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| async getContacts(args = {}) { | |
| const response = await this._makeRequest({ | |
| path: "/contacts", | |
| params: { | |
| page: 1, | |
| pageSize: 100, | |
| }, | |
| ...args, | |
| }); | |
| return response.data?.contacts || []; | |
| } |
| _baseUrl() { | ||
| return "https://public-api.production.liveswitch.com/v1"; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the API URL configurable.
The base URL should be configurable to support different environments (e.g., staging, production).
-_baseUrl() {
- return "https://public-api.production.liveswitch.com/v1";
+_baseUrl() {
+ const BASE_URLS = {
+ production: "https://public-api.production.liveswitch.com/v1",
+ staging: "https://public-api.staging.liveswitch.com/v1",
+ };
+ return BASE_URLS[this.$auth.environment || "production"];
},Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | ||
| const { | ||
| $ = this, | ||
| path, | ||
| headers, | ||
| ...otherOpts | ||
| } = opts; | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| ...otherOpts, | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| ...headers, | ||
| Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in _makeRequest.
Add better error handling to provide more informative error messages.
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) {
const {
$ = this,
path,
headers,
...otherOpts
} = opts;
- return axios($, {
- ...otherOpts,
- url: this._baseUrl() + path,
- headers: {
- ...headers,
- Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`,
- },
- });
+ try {
+ const response = await axios($, {
+ ...otherOpts,
+ url: this._baseUrl() + path,
+ headers: {
+ ...headers,
+ Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`,
+ },
+ });
+ return response;
+ } catch (err) {
+ const statusCode = err.response?.status;
+ const message = err.response?.data?.message || err.message;
+ throw new Error(`LiveSwitch API request failed [${statusCode}]: ${message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | |
| const { | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| headers, | |
| ...otherOpts | |
| } = opts; | |
| return axios($, { | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { | |
| const { | |
| $ = this, | |
| path, | |
| headers, | |
| ...otherOpts | |
| } = opts; | |
| try { | |
| const response = await axios($, { | |
| ...otherOpts, | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: { | |
| ...headers, | |
| Authorization: `Bearer ${this.$auth.oauth_access_token}`, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (err) { | |
| const statusCode = err.response?.status; | |
| const message = err.response?.data?.message || err.message; | |
| throw new Error(`LiveSwitch API request failed [${statusCode}]: ${message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
| async options() { | ||
| const response = await this.getContacts(); | ||
| return response.map(({ | ||
| id, firstName, lastName, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| value: id, | ||
| label: `${firstName} ${lastName}`, | ||
| })); | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle pagination in contactId options.
The options method should handle pagination to ensure all contacts are available for selection.
async options() {
- const response = await this.getContacts();
+ const contacts = [];
+ let page = 1;
+ while (true) {
+ const response = await this.getContacts({ params: { page, pageSize: 100 } });
+ if (!response.length) break;
+ contacts.push(...response);
+ page++;
+ }
return response.map(({
id, firstName, lastName,
}) => ({
value: id,
- label: `${firstName} ${lastName}`,
+ label: [firstName, lastName].filter(Boolean).join(" ") || id,
}));
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async options() { | |
| const response = await this.getContacts(); | |
| return response.map(({ | |
| id, firstName, lastName, | |
| }) => ({ | |
| value: id, | |
| label: `${firstName} ${lastName}`, | |
| })); | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| async options() { | |
| const contacts = []; | |
| let page = 1; | |
| while (true) { | |
| const response = await this.getContacts({ params: { page, pageSize: 100 } }); | |
| if (!response.length) break; | |
| contacts.push(...response); | |
| page++; | |
| } | |
| return contacts.map(({ | |
| id, firstName, lastName, | |
| }) => ({ | |
| value: id, | |
| label: [firstName, lastName].filter(Boolean).join(" ") || id, | |
| })); | |
| }, | |
| }, |
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/liveswitch/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
1-8: Consider using absolute imports for better maintainability.While the relative import works, consider using absolute imports to make the code more maintainable and resistant to file structure changes.
-import app from "../../liveswitch.app.mjs"; +import app from "components/liveswitch/liveswitch.app.mjs";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- components/liveswitch/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/liveswitch/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
9-35: Consider adding validation requirements for contact fields.The current implementation allows all fields to be optional. Consider:
- Making at least one contact field (phone, email) required for identification
- Adding format validation for phone and email fields
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| phone: this.phone, | ||
| firstName: this.firstName, | ||
| lastName: this.lastName, | ||
| email: this.email, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and input validation.
The current implementation could be more robust with:
- Error handling for API failures
- Input validation before making the API call
- Response validation before using response.id
Consider implementing these improvements:
async run({ $ }) {
+ // Validate that at least one contact field is provided
+ if (!this.phone && !this.email && !this.firstName && !this.lastName) {
+ throw new Error('At least one contact field (phone, email, firstName, lastName) must be provided');
+ }
+
+ try {
const response = await this.app.createContact({
$,
data: {
phone: this.phone,
firstName: this.firstName,
lastName: this.lastName,
email: this.email,
},
});
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid response: missing contact ID');
+ }
+
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`);
return response;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| // Validate that at least one contact field is provided | |
| if (!this.phone && !this.email && !this.firstName && !this.lastName) { | |
| throw new Error('At least one contact field (phone, email, firstName, lastName) must be provided'); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid response: missing contact ID'); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/liveswitch/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Consider enhancing the description.The module structure and metadata are well-defined. The documentation link is properly formatted and the version follows semantic versioning.
Consider adding a brief description of what a contact represents in LiveSwitch before the documentation link, to provide better context for users.
- description: "Create a contact in LiveSwitch [See the documentation](https://developer.liveswitch.com/reference/post_v1-contacts)", + description: "Create a new contact entry with phone, name, and email details in LiveSwitch. [See the documentation](https://developer.liveswitch.com/reference/post_v1-contacts)",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- components/liveswitch/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/liveswitch/actions/create-contact/create-contact.mjs (1)
9-35: Verify required fields in prop definitions.The props structure is correct, but we should verify if any of these fields should be marked as required in the app module's prop definitions.
Let's check the prop definitions in the app module:
✅ Verification successful
Props are correctly defined, but
phonefield is requiredLooking at the app module's prop definitions:
firstName,lastName, andphoneis the only required field (nooptional: trueproperty)This matches the implementation in the create-contact action. No changes needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check prop definitions in the app module # Expected: Find prop definitions for phone, firstName, lastName, and email rg -A 5 'propDefinition.*(?:phone|firstName|lastName|email)' components/liveswitch/liveswitch.app.mjsLength of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find prop definitions # First, let's check if the file exists and see its content fd "liveswitch.app.mjs" --type f --exec cat {}Length of output: 2380
| async run({ $ }) { | ||
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | ||
| $, | ||
| data: { | ||
| phone: this.phone, | ||
| firstName: this.firstName, | ||
| lastName: this.lastName, | ||
| email: this.email, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and input validation.
The implementation is missing error handling and input validation. Consider these improvements:
Apply this diff to enhance the implementation:
async run({ $ }) {
+ // Validate required fields
+ const requiredFields = {
+ phone: this.phone,
+ firstName: this.firstName,
+ };
+
+ const missingFields = Object.entries(requiredFields)
+ .filter(([_, value]) => !value)
+ .map(([key]) => key);
+
+ if (missingFields.length > 0) {
+ throw new Error(`Missing required fields: ${missingFields.join(', ')}`);
+ }
+
+ // Make API call with error handling
const response = await this.app.createContact({
$,
data: {
phone: this.phone,
firstName: this.firstName,
lastName: this.lastName,
email: this.email,
},
- });
+ }).catch((error) => {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`);
+ });
+
+ // Validate response
+ if (!response?.id) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid response: missing contact ID');
+ }
$.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`);
return response;
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, | |
| async run({ $ }) { | |
| // Validate required fields | |
| const requiredFields = { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| }; | |
| const missingFields = Object.entries(requiredFields) | |
| .filter(([_, value]) => !value) | |
| .map(([key]) => key); | |
| if (missingFields.length > 0) { | |
| throw new Error(`Missing required fields: ${missingFields.join(', ')}`); | |
| } | |
| // Make API call with error handling | |
| const response = await this.app.createContact({ | |
| $, | |
| data: { | |
| phone: this.phone, | |
| firstName: this.firstName, | |
| lastName: this.lastName, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| }, | |
| }).catch((error) => { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to create contact: ${error.message}`); | |
| }); | |
| // Validate response | |
| if (!response?.id) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid response: missing contact ID'); | |
| } | |
| $.export("$summary", `Successfully created Contact with ID: ${response.id}`); | |
| return response; | |
| }, |
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Version Update