-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Should KDE performs on the two images separately? #34
Comments
Kde is typically run after sparse sampling, and works on 4D coords. Symmetric shouldn't affect it. |
Regarding duplicates, yes this is likely. |
Don't know if I described clear. Line 6 in 5052229
|
I'm not sure I understand the question unfortunately. Why would we not want to take the other coordinates into account? |
No, because all corresps are from A to B even (we switch the ordering internally) |
That clears it up for me, thank you for clarifying my misunderstanding of this representation! |
Thanks for the great method which almost solved the WxBS problem.
I noticed symmetric matching is the default.
RoMa/roma/models/model_zoo/roma_models.py
Line 152 in 5052229
and KDE is performed on all sampled matches from
(H, 2*W)
warp results:RoMa/roma/models/matcher.py
Lines 475 to 486 in 5052229
The positions and warping of image1 and image2 should be independent.
So, should KDE performs on the two images separately?
Another question:
Since, the sampling is from symmetric matching, will the results contain many near duplicated matches?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: