You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Before the end of the hackathon we should be kicking off conversations with our partners & possible grant providers - like Aave.
This work includes:
discussing internally our 12 month plan
modeling that with a reasonable budget that includes bounties and a number of hackathons (quarterly?)
describing the benefits to grants and founding partners; quantifying benefits from the hackathons & getting quotes from participants and sponsors
from that modeling how many supporters and grant providers of what size we need
creating a list of 30+ partners for outreach - and starting to request introductions and similar
potentially dividing the work up when it comes to grant prep and meeting prep
FDD from Gitcoin will be the first group that we pitch on our value
using DAO Denver as an opportunity to meet in person & potentially close a set of founding supporters
calculating a simple issuance model for founding supporters and for the community based on the assumption that we will have something like a bicameral structure similar to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation and Optimism - whereby technical & community decisions are made on their merits AND an oversight function from sponsors and supporters to ensure wise use of funds
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can’t get notion to let me edit on iOS, so my bits here
Conference: ethDenver is good opportunity to build some momentum with projects as well as with sponsors. Planning a milestone for the next hackathon events and or project(s) release.
governance model:
board of directors or governing board: With either name it needs to be a combination of sponsors and the community. The community representation needs to be voted in.
administration staff: they will need to be managed by a paid leader. That leader will need to be managed the BoD / governance board.
Technical Committee: Project leaders to start. Add a few voted in community members later.
Projects: allow them to self organize using the tools. When they are ready, a leader is voted in.
This is ongoing - and for example I'll be incorporating the people and project pipelines as well as the Regen Rangers into the deck. However I think we can close it for now as we have something >1.0
Before the end of the hackathon we should be kicking off conversations with our partners & possible grant providers - like Aave.
This work includes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: