[BUG][Go] go-echo-server generator does not respect the --git-host argument

[osechet]

Bug Report Checklist

• Have you provided a full/minimal spec to reproduce the issue?
• Have you validated the input using an OpenAPI validator (example)?
• Have you tested with the latest master to confirm the issue still exists?
• Have you searched for related issues/PRs?
• What's the actual output vs expected output?
• [Optional] Sponsorship to speed up the bug fix or feature request (example)

Description

The go-echo-server generator does not respect the --git-host argument. The generated code always defines the module's name as "github.com/user/repo".

openapi-generator version

6.6.0
7.0.0-20230525.031952-54 (latest nightly)

OpenAPI declaration file content or url

The problem is not related to the input file. It can be reproduced with the petstore example: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openapitools/openapi-generator/master/modules/openapi-generator/src/test/resources/3_0/petstore.yaml

Generation Details

openapi-generator-cli generate -i https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openapitools/openapi-generator/master/modules/openapi-generator/src/test/resources/3_0/petstore.yaml --git-host gitlab.com --git-user-id myuser --git-repo-id myrepo -g go-echo-server --additional-properties packageName=myproject -o myproject

Steps to reproduce

• Call the command given in previous section
• Open go.mod or any file in the handlers directory
• The module is github.com/myuser/myrepo instead of gitlab.com/myuser/myrepo.

Related issues/PRs

N/A

Suggest a fix

Replacing github.com/{{{gitUserId}}}/{{{gitRepoId}}} by {{{gitHost}}}/{{{gitUserId}}}/{{{gitRepoId}}} in all the files of modules\openapi-generator\src\main\resources\go-echo-server should probably fix the issue.

[wing328]

can you please file a PR with the suggested fix? let us know if you need any help.

[lwj5]

Please help to close this issue

[osechet]

@lwj5 the issue is normally fixed with PR #15720. It can be closed.

[lwj5]

Yes, please click close this issue