Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insert new version of omnisharp-roslyn #5520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2023

Conversation

dibarbet
Copy link
Member

@dibarbet dibarbet commented Jan 5, 2023

No description provided.

@dibarbet dibarbet requested a review from 333fred January 5, 2023 23:39
@@ -117,10 +127,6 @@ See issue [#5120](https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-vscode/issues/5120) for
* Update to latest .NET SDKs (PR: [omnisharp-roslyn##2378](https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/pull/2378))
* Remove MSBuild and Mono from release packages ([omnisharp-roslyn##2339](https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/issues/2339), PR: [omnisharp-roslyn##2360](https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-roslyn/pull/2360))

## What's new in 1.24.4
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

based on the instructions I have we only keep the last few releases in the readme (still available in the changelog). So removing the oldest when I added a new one.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright

@dibarbet dibarbet merged commit 9a08775 into dotnet:master Jan 6, 2023
@dibarbet dibarbet deleted the omnisharp_roslyn_update branch January 6, 2023 00:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants