We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dear reader, this model: GT4HistOCR_5000000 0.997_191951 for tesseract is linked on the workflow guide. But on https://ub-backup.bib.uni-mannheim.de/~stweil/ocrd-train/data/GT4HistOCR_5000000/tessdata_best/ the best seems to be GT4HistOCR_5000000 0.575_401209.traineddata
and there is a newer directory GT4HistOCR_5000000-2 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
already mentioned in #297 BTW. But ideally, we should recommend nothing other than frak2021
Sorry, something went wrong.
Didn't know https://ocr-bw.bib.uni-mannheim.de/anwendung/druckwerke/ . Thanks!
No branches or pull requests
Dear reader,
this model: GT4HistOCR_5000000 0.997_191951 for tesseract is linked on the workflow guide.
But on https://ub-backup.bib.uni-mannheim.de/~stweil/ocrd-train/data/GT4HistOCR_5000000/tessdata_best/ the best seems to be GT4HistOCR_5000000 0.575_401209.traineddata
and there is a newer directory GT4HistOCR_5000000-2 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: