Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Micro phase coherence for four channel #964

Open
venky0108 opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Micro phase coherence for four channel #964

venky0108 opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@venky0108
Copy link

i have added trigger functionality in python binding bladerf script. I have verified the trigger functionality by using bladerf functions

trigger_init()
trigger_arm()
trigger_fire()
trigger_state()

trigger signal is J51-1

before Sync_RX() trigger signal is defined, trigger initialized and armed.

After Sync_RX() call , trigger is fired & data from four channels is collected. cross correlation is done with channel 1 data with rest 3 channels. index of correlation is collected & statistics such as mean,variance,standard deviation,min value, max value, total range is calculated for 1000 measurements.

setup:
pure carrier signal is fed to power splitter input and four outputs of power splitter are fed four channels of SDR Boards ( 2 RX channels per board)

Observations:

1)Frequency offset of the four channels are measured and they are same

Channel Mean Standard Deviation Min value Max Value range
Freq offset ch1 -478.7109375 38.80481412 -585.9375 -366.2109375 219.7265625
Freq offset ch2 -475.78125 38.89318775 -585.9375 -366.2109375 219.7265625
Freq offset ch3 -478.7109375 38.80481412 -585.9375 -366.2109375 219.7265625
Freq offset ch4 -475.78125 38.89318775 -585.9375 -366.2109375 219.7265625
Freq offset ch1 -476.953125 42.06525257 -585.9375 -366.2109375 219.7265625
Freq offset ch2 -472.8515625 38.76055174 -512.6953125 -366.2109375 146.484375
Freq offset ch3 -476.953125 42.06525257 -585.9375 -366.2109375 219.7265625
Freq offset ch4 -472.8515625 38.76055174 -512.6953125 -366.2109375 146.484375
Freq offset ch1 -472.8515625 39.8523658 -512.6953125 -366.2109375 146.484375
Freq offset ch2 -472.8515625 41.95083356 -512.6953125 -366.2109375 146.484375
Freq offset ch3 -472.8515625 39.8523658 -512.6953125 -366.2109375 146.484375
Freq offset ch4 -472.8515625 41.95083356 -512.6953125 -366.2109375 146.484375

2)Phase offset between channel 1 & 2, 1&3 , 1& 4, 3 & 4 are measured. Phase offset is not same with respect to channel .

Channel Mean Standard Deviation Min value Max Value range
phase offset ch1 & ch2 -138.96 2.144388025 -141 -128 13
phase offset ch1 & ch3 145.888 891.5005617 -4040 4011 8051
phase offset ch1 & ch4 119.64 901.8573759 -4002 4049 8051
phase offset ch3 & ch4 33.856 1.129275874 25 34 9
phase offset ch1 & ch2 -138.392 2.18319399 -140 -128 12
phase offset ch1 & ch3 8.896 684.6637694 -3582 3904 7486
phase offset ch1 & ch4 74.288 682.0492629 -635 3944 4579
phase offset ch3 & ch4 34.016 0.85775521 25 35 10
phase offset ch1 & ch2 -136.304 3.427474872 -140 -127 13
phase offset ch1 & ch3 -70.096 791.8313702 -4096 4197 8293
phase offset ch1 & ch4 -149.824 774.8225094 -4192 603 4795
phase offset ch3 & ch4 34.096 0.294591242 34 35 1

as you can see frequency offset of 4 channels is almost same as clock is shared from board 1 to board

In the phase offset measurement, channel 1 & channel 2 and channel 3 & channel 4 ( i.e., two channels on the same board) has correlation index value std deviation is very low(index range is low). For channel 1 & channel 3 and Channel 1 & Channel 4 ( i.e., channel 1 of board 1 and two channels of board 2) correlation index std deviation is very high ( index range is large) indicating signals are completely uncorrelated.

Let me know , what i am missing

@venky0108
Copy link
Author

There will be phase offset between channels, but as per my understanding that phase offset should be fixed not random as between channel 1 & Channel 3 and channel 1 & Channel 4.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant