From 065473fdce2438f6dc84385919c4073eaf680ffa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Teknium <127238744+teknium1@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:56:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] test(gateway): loosen hygiene-timeout wall-clock bound to
 flake policy minimum
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

0.15s missed by 1-8ms on busy CI shards twice today (runs 30025889952,
30026770278 — branches not touching this file). The assertion pins
'handler did not block on the timeout path' (blocking = seconds); 2.0s
keeps the contract per the loose-bounds flake policy.
---
 tests/gateway/test_session_hygiene.py | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/gateway/test_session_hygiene.py b/tests/gateway/test_session_hygiene.py
index d03903747ec67..b41b303784439 100644
--- a/tests/gateway/test_session_hygiene.py
+++ b/tests/gateway/test_session_hygiene.py
@@ -811,7 +811,11 @@ def _compress_context(
     elapsed = time.monotonic() - started
 
     assert result == "ok"
-    assert elapsed < 0.15
+    # Loose wall-clock bound per flake policy: this asserts the handler did
+    # NOT block on the hygiene-compression timeout path (which would take
+    # multiple seconds), not a precise latency. 0.15s missed by ~1-8ms on
+    # busy CI shards twice on 2026-07-23.
+    assert elapsed < 2.0
     assert worker_started.is_set()
     assert runner._run_agent.await_count == 1
     assert runner._hygiene_compression_failure_cooldowns["sess-timeout"] > time.time()