You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In case the .drv has input derivations, that is it references other .drv, then such .drv paths are replaced by this same algorithm which returns a hash.
Just above this, the text describes how in order to calculate the hash of the derivation, output derivations are replaced with an empty string. I don't believe this is done for input derivations, as I'm pretty sure they should be already known when calculating the hash of a derivation.
Am I correct? If so, I suggest to change the paragraph to something like:
In case the .drv has input derivations, that is, it references other .drvs, there is no need to replace their path with an empty string, since their hash is calculated beforehand, using the algorithm described here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I read this in chapter 18:
Just above this, the text describes how in order to calculate the hash of the derivation, output derivations are replaced with an empty string. I don't believe this is done for input derivations, as I'm pretty sure they should be already known when calculating the hash of a derivation.
Am I correct? If so, I suggest to change the paragraph to something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: