diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/README.md b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/README.md index b56a438df..d5b2428ce 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/README.md +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/README.md @@ -1,11 +1,65 @@ # Description -Data links: ? +This is a resource server for verifying terminal-based agent actions. It evaluates agent responses that represent terminal command sequences against expected answers. The server supports two different schema formats (`terminus_1` and `terminus_2`) for terminal interaction tasks. + +For each verification request, the agent's JSON output is validated through multiple checks: +1. **JSON Parsing**: The model output must be valid JSON +2. **Schema Validation**: The response must conform to the specified harness schema (`terminus_1` or `terminus_2`) +3. **Task Completion**: If the expected answer requires task completion, the agent must also indicate completion +4. **Command Correctness**: The predicted keystrokes must exactly match the expected keystrokes in order + - This is evaluated via string similarity and equivalency llm-as-judge + + +## Supported Schemas + +### terminus_1 +- `state_analysis`: Description of the current terminal state +- `explanation`: Brief explanation of what the commands will do +- `commands`: List of command objects with `keystrokes`, `is_blocking`, and `timeout_sec` +- `is_task_complete`: Boolean indicating if the task is complete + +### terminus_2 +- `analysis`: Analysis of the current state based on terminal output +- `plan`: Description of the plan for next steps +- `commands`: List of command objects with `keystrokes` and optional `duration` +- `task_complete`: Boolean indicating if the task is complete (optional) + + +# Example usage + +## Running servers + +The following command can be used to run this resource server, along with the simple agent and a policy model: + +```bash +config_paths="resources_servers/terminus_judge/configs/terminus_judge.yaml,\ +responses_api_models/openai_model/configs/openai_model.yaml" + +ng_run "+config_paths=[$config_paths]" \ + +terminus_judge_resources_server.resources_servers.terminus_judge.judge_responses_create_params.max_output_tokens=512 +``` + +Then, rollouts can be collected using a command such as the following: + +```bash +ng_collect_rollouts +agent_name=terminus_judge_simple_agent \ + +input_jsonl_fpath=resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example.jsonl \ + +output_jsonl_fpath=resources_servers/terminus_judge/example_rollouts.jsonl +``` + +## Expected Data Format + +Each data sample should include: +- `expected_answer`: A JSON string containing the expected terminal commands +- `metadata.harness`: Either `"terminus_1"` or `"terminus_2"` to specify the schema format +- `threshold`: threshold for string similarity to calculate the reward # Licensing information -Code: ? -Data: ? -Dependencies +Code: Apache 2.0
+Data: TBD + +## Dependencies + - nemo_gym: Apache 2.0 -? +- openapi-schema-validator: BSD-3-Clause diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/app.py b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/app.py index deab5ef98..0958ef02e 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/app.py +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/app.py @@ -13,10 +13,14 @@ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. import asyncio +import json from contextlib import nullcontext -from typing import Any, Optional +from difflib import SequenceMatcher +from enum import Enum +from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional from fastapi import FastAPI +from openapi_schema_validator import validate as validate_against_schema_openapi from pydantic import BaseModel, ConfigDict from nemo_gym.base_resources_server import ( @@ -32,45 +36,82 @@ NeMoGymResponse, NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming, ) +from resources_servers.terminus_judge.schemas import TERMINUS_1_SCHEMA, TERMINUS_2_SCHEMA -class TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig(BaseResourcesServerConfig): - name: str = "terminus_judge" - judge_model_server: ModelServerRef - judge_responses_create_params: NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming - judge_endpoint_max_concurrency: Optional[int] = 64 - judge_system_message: Optional[str] = None - judge_prompt_template_fpath: str = "prompt_templates/terminus_judge.txt" - judge_equal_label: str = "[[A=B]]" - judge_not_equal_label: str = "[[A!=B]]" - check_twice_swap: bool = False - reward_if_swap_fails: float = 0.0 +SCHEMA_MAP = { + "terminus_1": TERMINUS_1_SCHEMA, + "terminus_2": TERMINUS_2_SCHEMA, +} -class TerminusJudgeRunRequest(BaseRunRequest): - """Run/verify request payload.""" +class FailureCode(str, Enum): + """Enumeration of possible failure reasons.""" - model_config = ConfigDict(extra="allow") + NONE = "none" + JSON_PARSING_FAILED = "json_parsing_failed" + SCHEMA_CHECK_FAILED = "schema_check_failed" + TASK_COMPLETE_CHECK_FAILED = "task_complete_check_failed" + COMMAND_CORRECTNESS_FAILED = "command_correctness_failed" + UNKNOWN_HARNESS = "unknown_harness" + JUDGE_EVALUATION_FAILED = "judge_evaluation_failed" + UNKNOWN_ERROR = "unknown_error" - uuid: Optional[str | int] = None - expected_answer: Optional[str] = None - options: Optional[list[dict[str, str]]] = None - metadata: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None +def extract_keystrokes(data: Dict[str, Any]) -> List[str]: + """Extract all keystrokes from commands list.""" + commands = data.get("commands", []) + return [cmd.get("keystrokes", "") for cmd in commands if "keystrokes" in cmd] -class TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest(TerminusJudgeRunRequest, BaseVerifyRequest): - pass +def text_similarity(s1: str, s2: str) -> float: + """Compute similarity ratio between two strings using SequenceMatcher. + Returns value between 0 (no similarity) and 1 (identical). + """ + return SequenceMatcher(None, s1, s2).ratio() -class JudgeEvaluation(BaseModel): - responses_create_params: NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming - response: NeMoGymResponse - verdict_label: Optional[str] = None +def command_similarity(gt: Dict[str, Any], pred: Dict[str, Any], separator: str = "") -> float: + """ + Compute text similarity between commands in gt and pred. -class TerminusJudgeVerifyResponse(BaseVerifyResponse): - expected_answer: str - judge_evaluations: list[JudgeEvaluation] + Concatenates all commands in sequence before comparing, preserving + the sequential execution order. + + Args: + gt: Ground truth dictionary with 'commands' key + pred: Prediction dictionary with 'commands' key + separator: String to join commands with (default: empty string) + + Returns: + Similarity score between 0 (no similarity) and 1 (identical) + """ + gt_keystrokes = extract_keystrokes(gt) + pred_keystrokes = extract_keystrokes(pred) + + if not gt_keystrokes and not pred_keystrokes: + return 1.0 # Both empty = identical + + if not gt_keystrokes or not pred_keystrokes: + return 0.0 # One empty, one not = no similarity + + # Concatenate commands in sequence + gt_concat = separator.join(gt_keystrokes) + pred_concat = separator.join(pred_keystrokes) + + # Compare concatenated command sequences + return text_similarity(gt_concat, pred_concat) + + +def check_task_complete(pred: dict, expected_answer: dict) -> bool: + """Check if task completion flags are properly set.""" + if "task_complete" in expected_answer and expected_answer["task_complete"]: + if "task_complete" not in pred or not pred["task_complete"]: + return False + elif "is_task_complete" in expected_answer and expected_answer["is_task_complete"]: + if "is_task_complete" not in pred or not pred["is_task_complete"]: + return False + return True def _extract_last_assistant_text(body: BaseVerifyRequest) -> str: @@ -94,15 +135,69 @@ def _extract_last_assistant_text(body: BaseVerifyRequest) -> str: return "" -def _extract_expected_answer(req: TerminusJudgeRunRequest) -> Optional[str]: +def _extract_expected_answer(req: BaseRunRequest) -> Optional[str]: """Extract expected answer from request.""" - if req.expected_answer: + if hasattr(req, "expected_answer") and req.expected_answer: return str(req.expected_answer) - md = req.metadata or {} + md = getattr(req, "metadata", None) or {} exp = md.get("expected_answer") return str(exp) if exp is not None else None +class TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig(BaseResourcesServerConfig): + name: str = "terminus_judge" + judge_model_server: ModelServerRef + judge_responses_create_params: NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming + judge_endpoint_max_concurrency: Optional[int] = 64 + judge_system_message: Optional[str] = None + judge_prompt_template_fpath: str = "prompt_templates/terminus_prompt.txt" + judge_equal_label: str = "[[A=B]]" + judge_not_equal_label: str = "[[A!=B]]" + check_twice_swap: bool = False + reward_if_swap_fails: float = 0.0 + + # String similarity config + enable_string_similarity: bool = True + string_similarity_threshold: float = None + + +class TerminusJudgeRunRequest(BaseRunRequest): + """Run/verify request payload.""" + + model_config = ConfigDict(extra="allow") + + uuid: Optional[str | int] = None + expected_answer: Optional[str] = None + metadata: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None + threshold: Optional[float] = None + + +class TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest(TerminusJudgeRunRequest, BaseVerifyRequest): + pass + + +class JudgeEvaluation(BaseModel): + responses_create_params: NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming + response: NeMoGymResponse + verdict_label: Optional[str] = None + + +class TerminusJudgeVerifyResponse(BaseVerifyResponse): + uuid: Optional[str | int] = None + expected_answer: str + model_output: str + parsed_output: Optional[dict] = None + similarity_score: float = -1.0 + schema_check_passed: bool = False + task_complete_check_passed: bool = False + string_similarity_passed: bool = False + judge_passed: bool = False + failure_reason: Optional[FailureCode] = None + judge_evaluations: list[JudgeEvaluation] = [] + metadata: Optional[dict[str, Any]] = None + threshold: Optional[float] = None + + class TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(SimpleResourcesServer): config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig @@ -119,7 +214,6 @@ def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): def setup_webserver(self) -> FastAPI: app = super().setup_webserver() - return app async def verify(self, body: TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest) -> TerminusJudgeVerifyResponse: @@ -130,22 +224,98 @@ async def verify(self, body: TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest) -> TerminusJudgeVerifyR generated = _extract_last_assistant_text(body) if not generated: raise ValueError("No assistant response found/extracted to verify") - # Run first judge evaluation - first_equal, first_eval = await self._generate_judge_evaluation( - expected_answer=expected, generated_answer=generated - ) - - evaluations = [first_eval] - # Handle swap check if configured - if first_equal and self.config.check_twice_swap: - second_equal, second_eval = await self._generate_judge_evaluation( - expected_answer=generated, generated_answer=expected - ) - evaluations.append(second_eval) - reward = 1.0 if second_equal else self.config.reward_if_swap_fails - else: - reward = 1.0 if first_equal else 0.0 + reward = 0.0 + failure_reason = None + schema_passed = False + task_complete_passed = False + string_similarity_passed = False + judge_passed = False + similarity_score = -1.0 + parsed_output = None + judge_evaluations = [] + + # Extract thinking tags if present + text = generated + if "" in text: + text = text.split("")[-1].strip() + + # Schema and Task Completion Checks + try: + expected_dict = json.loads(expected) + pred = json.loads(text) + parsed_output = pred + + # Check harness type + harness = body.metadata.get("harness", None) if body.metadata else None + if harness is None or harness not in ["terminus_1", "terminus_2"]: + failure_reason = FailureCode.UNKNOWN_HARNESS + else: + # Schema validation (must pass) + try: + validate_against_schema_openapi(pred, SCHEMA_MAP[harness]) + schema_passed = True + except Exception: + failure_reason = FailureCode.SCHEMA_CHECK_FAILED + + # Task completion check (must pass) + if schema_passed: + if check_task_complete(pred, expected_dict): + task_complete_passed = True + else: + failure_reason = FailureCode.TASK_COMPLETE_CHECK_FAILED + + # String Similarity Check + if schema_passed and task_complete_passed and self.config.enable_string_similarity: + similarity_score = command_similarity(expected_dict, pred) + threshold = ( + body.threshold if body.threshold is not None else self.config.string_similarity_threshold + ) + + if similarity_score >= threshold: + # String similarity passed - binary reward of 1.0 + string_similarity_passed = True + reward = 1.0 + failure_reason = FailureCode.NONE + else: + # String similarity failed - invoke judge + failure_reason = FailureCode.COMMAND_CORRECTNESS_FAILED + + # Judge Evaluation + first_equal, first_eval = await self._generate_judge_evaluation( + expected_answer=expected, generated_answer=text + ) + judge_evaluations.append(first_eval) + + if first_equal: + if self.config.check_twice_swap: + second_equal, second_eval = await self._generate_judge_evaluation( + expected_answer=text, generated_answer=expected + ) + judge_evaluations.append(second_eval) + + if second_equal: + judge_passed = True + reward = 1.0 + failure_reason = FailureCode.NONE + else: + reward = self.config.reward_if_swap_fails + failure_reason = FailureCode.JUDGE_EVALUATION_FAILED + else: + judge_passed = True + reward = 1.0 + failure_reason = FailureCode.NONE + else: + failure_reason = FailureCode.JUDGE_EVALUATION_FAILED + reward = 0.0 + + except json.JSONDecodeError: + failure_reason = FailureCode.JSON_PARSING_FAILED + reward = 0.0 + except Exception as e: + failure_reason = FailureCode.UNKNOWN_ERROR + reward = 0.0 + print(f"DEBUG: Unknown error in verify: {type(e).__name__} {e}", flush=True) payload = body.model_dump() payload.pop("expected_answer", None) @@ -154,7 +324,15 @@ async def verify(self, body: TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest) -> TerminusJudgeVerifyR **payload, reward=reward, expected_answer=expected, - judge_evaluations=evaluations, + model_output=text, + parsed_output=parsed_output, + similarity_score=similarity_score, + schema_check_passed=schema_passed, + task_complete_check_passed=task_complete_passed, + string_similarity_passed=string_similarity_passed, + judge_passed=judge_passed, + failure_reason=failure_reason, + judge_evaluations=judge_evaluations, ) async def _generate_judge_evaluation( diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/configs/terminus_judge.yaml b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/configs/terminus_judge.yaml index e22eec112..a67870214 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/configs/terminus_judge.yaml +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/configs/terminus_judge.yaml @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ terminus_judge_resources_server: # Reward when the second (swap) pass fails; default 0.0, can be -1.0 reward_if_swap_fails: 0.0 + # String similarity configuration (NEW) + enable_string_similarity: true + string_similarity_threshold: 0.9 + domain: agent verified: false description: single-step terminal based task diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example.jsonl b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example.jsonl index f79f4a23b..8f8c583fe 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example.jsonl +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example.jsonl @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nGrant dispatcher assignments swapped causing wrong handler selection\n\n#### Description\n\nThe OpenID Connect grant dispatchers are incorrectly assigning the default_grant and oidc_grant parameters, causing the wrong grant handlers to be selected based on request scopes.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.openid.connect.core.grant_types.dispatchers import ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types import ImplicitGrant as OAuth2ImplicitGrant\nfrom oauthlib.openid.connect.core.grant_types import ImplicitGrant\n\n# Create dispatcher with OAuth2 as default and OpenID as oidc grant\ndispatcher = ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher(\n default_grant=OAuth2ImplicitGrant(),\n oidc_grant=ImplicitGrant()\n)\n\n# Mock request with OAuth2 scopes (should use default_grant)\nclass MockRequest:\n def __init__(self, scopes):\n self.scopes = scopes\n\nrequest = MockRequest(('hello', 'world'))\nhandler = dispatcher._handler_for_request(request)\n\n# This should return OAuth2ImplicitGrant but returns ImplicitGrant instead\nprint(f\"Handler type: {type(handler)}\")\nprint(f\"Expected: OAuth2ImplicitGrant, Got: {type(handler).__name__}\")\n\n# Test with OpenID scopes\nrequest_openid = MockRequest(('hello', 'openid'))\nhandler_openid = dispatcher._handler_for_request(request_openid)\n\n# This should return ImplicitGrant but returns OAuth2ImplicitGrant instead \nprint(f\"OpenID Handler type: {type(handler_openid)}\")\nprint(f\"Expected: ImplicitGrant, Got: {type(handler_openid).__name__}\")\n```\n\nThe same issue affects AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher where the request_validator is also being set to None instead of the provided validator.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container. I need to investigate and fix the OpenID Connect grant dispatchers issue where assignments are swapped causing wrong handler selection. First, I'll check the current directory structure to locate the relevant code.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll use the find command to locate the OAuthLib source code in the container, which should help me identify where the dispatcher classes are defined.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find / -type f -name \\\"*.py\\\" -path \\\"*/oauthlib/*\\\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E \\\"(dispatcher|grant)\\\" | head -20\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed# find / -type f -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauthlib/*\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E \"(dispatcher|grant)\" | head -20; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/hybrid.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/base.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/authorization_code.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/implicit.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/refresh_token.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/authorization_code.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/refresh_token.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/client_credentials.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/resource_owner_password_credentials.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/base.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/__init__.py\n(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I've found the relevant OAuthLib source files, and the dispatcher file is located at /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py. This is exactly where I need to look to fix the issue with swapped grant assignments. I'll examine this file first.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll use the cat command to view the contents of the dispatchers.py file to understand the current implementation and identify the bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n \"\"\"Read scope and route to the designated handler.\"\"\"\n return self._handler_for_request(request).validate_authorization_request(request)\n\n\nclass AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher(Dispatcher):\n \"\"\"\n This is an adapter class that will route simple Token requests, those that authorization_code have a scope\n including 'openid' to either the default_grant or the oidc_grant based on the scopes requested.\n \"\"\"\n def __init__(self, request_validator, default_grant=None, oidc_grant=None):\n self.oidc_grant = default_grant\n self.default_grant = oidc_grant\n self.request_validator = None\n\n def _handler_for_request(self, request):\n handler = self.default_grant\n scopes = ()\n parameters = dict(request.decoded_body)\n client_id = parameters.get('client_id')\n code = parameters.get('code')\n redirect_uri = parameters.get('redirect_uri')\n\n # If code is not present fallback to `default_grant` which will\n # raise an error for the missing `code` in `create_token_response` step.\n if code:\n scopes = self.request_validator.get_authorization_code_scopes(client_id, code, redirect_uri, request)\n\n if 'openid' in scopes:\n handler = self.oidc_grant\n\n log.debug('Selecting handler for request %r.', handler)\n return handler\n\n def create_token_response(self, request, token_handler):\n \"\"\"Read scope and route to the designated handler.\"\"\"\n handler = self._handler_for_request(request)\n return handler.create_token_response(request, token_handler)\n(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed#\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see the bug in the AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher class. Looking at the code, there are two clear issues:\\n1. In the __init__ method, the assignments are swapped: self.oidc_grant = default_grant and self.default_grant = oidc_grant\\n2. The request_validator is being set to None instead of the provided validator\\n\\nI also need to check the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher to see if it has similar issues.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll continue examining the file to see the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -A 20 \\\"class ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "24fb995a-3fc0-4d45-9ca4-10888baec272-5", "metadata": {"category": "others"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "tb_simple_agent"}} -{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nMissing `_get_updated_schema` method breaks schema migration\n\n#### Description\n\nThe `_get_updated_schema` static method was removed from the Permissions class, but it's still being called during schema updates. This causes an AttributeError when trying to migrate old permission configurations.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom redbot.cogs.permissions.permissions import Permissions\n\n# This would typically happen during bot startup with old config data\nold_config = {\n \"0\": {\n \"owner_models\": {\n \"cogs\": {\n \"Admin\": {\n \"allow\": [78631113035100160],\n \"deny\": [96733288462286848]\n }\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"ping\": {\n \"allow\": [96733288462286848],\n \"default\": \"allow\"\n }\n }\n }\n }\n}\n\n# This will fail with AttributeError\nPermissions._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n```\n\nThe error occurs because the method that handles converting old permission schema formats to the new format is no longer available, breaking backwards compatibility for users upgrading from older versions.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container, in a virtual environment called 'testbed'. I need to locate and fix the missing '_get_updated_schema' method in the Permissions class.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, I'll check the current directory structure to locate the redbot project files, particularly the permissions module mentioned in the error.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find . -name \\\"redbot\\\" -type d\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed# find . -name \"redbot\" -type d; tmux wait -S done\n./redbot\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I found a directory named 'redbot' in the current path. Now I need to explore this directory to locate the permissions module mentioned in the error.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll navigate to the redbot directory and look for the cogs/permissions structure mentioned in the error.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cd redbot && find . -path \\\"*/cogs/permissions*\\\" -type f\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/en-US.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/he-IL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/id-ID.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/es-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-TW.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ko-KR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/uk-UA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-CN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hu-HU.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sl-SI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/el-GR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/lol-US.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sr-CS.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nb-NO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/tr-TR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ca-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-HK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bg-BG.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sv-SE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sk-SK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/vi-VN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ja-JP.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/da-DK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ro-RO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I've found the permissions module at './cogs/permissions/permissions.py'. This is where the Permissions class is defined and where the missing _get_updated_schema method should be located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll examine the permissions.py file to understand the current implementation and confirm that the _get_updated_schema method is indeed missing.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \\\"_get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/id-ID.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/es-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-TW.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ko-KR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/uk-UA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-CN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hu-HU.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sl-SI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/el-GR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/lol-US.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sr-CS.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nb-NO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/tr-TR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ca-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-HK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bg-BG.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sv-SE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sk-SK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/vi-VN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ja-JP.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/da-DK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ro-RO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"_get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n707: new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The grep command found a reference to _get_updated_schema on line 707, but didn't find the method definition itself. This confirms the method is missing but still being called. Let's check more context around this line to understand how it should work.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll examine the lines around 707 in the permissions.py file to understand how _get_updated_schema is being used.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | sed -n '700,720p'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/ro-RO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"_get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n707: new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | sed -n '700,720p'; tmux wait -S done\n\n async def _maybe_update_schema(self) -> None:\n \"\"\"Maybe update rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0.\"\"\"\n if await self.config.version():\n return\n old_config = await self.config.all_guilds()\n old_config[GLOBAL] = await self.config.all()\n new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n await self.config.custom(COG).set(new_cog_rules)\n await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n await self.config.version.set(__version__)\n\n async def _load_all_rules(self):\n \"\"\"Load all of this cog's rules into loaded commands and cogs.\"\"\"\n for category, getter in ((COG, self.bot.get_cog), (COMMAND, self.bot.get_command)):\n all_rules = await self.config.custom(category).all()\n for name, rules in all_rules.items():\n obj = getter(name)\n if obj is None:\n continue\n self._load_rules_for(obj, rules)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see that _get_updated_schema is being called in the _maybe_update_schema method, which is responsible for updating rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0. The method is being called on self (an instance of the Permissions class), but it should be a static method according to the error description.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's search for any definition of _get_updated_schema in the entire file to make sure it's not defined somewhere else.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \\\"def _get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"_get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n707: new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | sed -n '700,720p'; tmux wait -S done\n\n async def _maybe_update_schema(self) -> None:\n \"\"\"Maybe update rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0.\"\"\"\n if await self.config.version():\n return\n old_config = await self.config.all_guilds()\n old_config[GLOBAL] = await self.config.all()\n new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n await self.config.custom(COG).set(new_cog_rules)\n await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n await self.config.version.set(__version__)\n\n async def _load_all_rules(self):\n \"\"\"Load all of this cog's rules into loaded commands and cogs.\"\"\"\n for category, getter in ((COG, self.bot.get_cog), (COMMAND, self.bot.get_command)):\n all_rules = await self.config.custom(category).all()\n for name, rules in all_rules.items():\n obj = getter(name)\n if obj is None:\n continue\n self._load_rules_for(obj, rules)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"def _get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The search for 'def _get_updated_schema' returned no results, confirming that the method is indeed missing from the file. Now I need to understand what this method should do by examining the context where it's being used.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check the git history to see if I can find when this method was removed and what it used to do.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git log --oneline -p -- ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 20 -B 5 \\\"_get_updated_schema\\\" | head -30\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": " all_rules = await self.config.custom(category).all()\n for name, rules in all_rules.items():\n obj = getter(name)\n if obj is None:\n continue\n self._load_rules_for(obj, rules)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"def _get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# git log --oneline -p -- ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 20 -B 5 \"_get_updated_schema\" | head -30; tmux\nwait -S done\n@@ -749,56 +709,6 @@ class Permissions(commands.Cog):\n await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n await self.config.version.set(__version__)\n\n- @staticmethod\n- def _get_updated_schema(\n- old_config: _OldConfigSchema,\n- ) -> Tuple[_NewConfigSchema, _NewConfigSchema]:\n- # Prior to 1.0.0, the schema was in this form for both global\n- # and guild-based rules:\n- # \"owner_models\"\n- # -> \"cogs\"\n- # -> Cog names...\n- # -> \"allow\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"deny\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"default\"\n- # -> \"allow\"|\"deny\"\n- # -> \"commands\"\n- # -> Command names...\n- # -> \"allow\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"deny\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"default\"\n--\n+ \"\"\"Maybe update rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0.\"\"\"\n+ if await self.config.version():\n+ return\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see from the git log output that the _get_updated_schema method was indeed removed. It was a static method that converted old config schema to the new schema format. I need to restore this method in the Permissions class.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's get more of the git diff to see the complete implementation of the _get_updated_schema method that was removed.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git log --oneline -p -- ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 50 \\\"@staticmethod\\\" | grep -A 50 \\\"_get_updated_schema\\\" | head -60\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "-\n- new_cog_rules = {}\n- new_cmd_rules = {}\n- for guild_id, old_rules in old_config.items():\n- if \"owner_models\" not in old_rules:\n- continue\n- old_rules = old_rules[\"owner_models\"]\n- for category, new_rules in zip((\"cogs\", \"commands\"), (new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules)):\n- if category in old_rules:\n- for name, rules in old_rules[category].items():\n- these_rules = new_rules.setdefault(name, {})\n- guild_rules = these_rules.setdefault(str(guild_id), {})\n- # Since allow rules would take precedence if the same model ID\n- # sat in both the allow and deny list, we add the deny entries\n- # first and let any conflicting allow entries overwrite.\n- for model_id in rules.get(\"deny\", []):\n- guild_rules[str(model_id)] = False\n- for model_id in rules.get(\"allow\", []):\n- guild_rules[str(model_id)] = True\n- if \"default\" in rules:\n- default = rules[\"default\"]\n- if default == \"allow\":\n- guild_rules[\"default\"] = True\n- elif default == \"deny\":\n- guild_rules[\"default\"] = False\n- return new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules\n-\n async def _load_all_rules(self):\n--\n--\n+ new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n+ await self.config.custom(COG).set(new_cog_rules)\n+ await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n--\n+ @staticmethod\n+ def _get_updated_schema(\n+ old_config: _OldConfigSchema,\n+ ) -> Tuple[_NewConfigSchema, _NewConfigSchema]:\ngrep: write error: Broken pipe\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see part of the implementation but it got cut off. Let's try a different approach to get the complete method implementation.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check the full commit that removed this method to get the complete implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git show HEAD~10:./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 50 \\\"def _get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "cf643768-4eb6-4e5d-a287-0536187ce0f8-15", "metadata": {"category": "others"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "tb_simple_agent"}} -{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nUserInfo endpoint returns wrong HTTP status code and raises incorrect exception\n\n#### Description\n\nThe UserInfo endpoint is returning HTTP status code 201 instead of 200 for successful responses, and raising `InvalidClientError` instead of `ServerError` when the \"sub\" claim is missing from user claims.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.openid.connect.core.endpoints.userinfo import UserInfoEndpoint\nfrom oauthlib.common import Request\n\n# Mock validator that returns claims without 'sub'\nclass MockValidator:\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n request.scopes = ['openid']\n return True\n\n def get_userinfo_claims(self, request):\n return {'name': 'John Doe', 'email': 'john@example.com'} # Missing 'sub'\n\nvalidator = MockValidator()\nendpoint = UserInfoEndpoint(validator)\n\n# Create a request\nrequest = Request('http://example.com/userinfo')\nrequest.access_token = 'valid_token'\n\ntry:\n headers, body, status = endpoint.create_userinfo_response('http://example.com/userinfo')\n print(f\"Status code: {status}\") # Should be 200, but returns 201\nexcept Exception as e:\n print(f\"Exception: {type(e).__name__}\") # Should be ServerError, but raises InvalidClientError\n```\n\nAlso, when userinfo claims are returned as a JWT string, the endpoint incorrectly returns status 201 instead of 200.\n\nThe endpoint should return HTTP status 200 for successful userinfo responses and raise `ServerError` when required claims are missing, as per OpenID Connect specification.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@e1db3683e3c1:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm in a terminal session with a Python virtual environment activated (testbed). I need to investigate an issue with the OAuthlib UserInfo endpoint. First, I should check if oauthlib is installed and locate the relevant files.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed and examine its version to understand the context of the issue.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip list | grep oauthlib\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@e1db3683e3c1:/testbed# pip list | grep oauthlib; tmux wait -S done\noauthlib 3.2.2 /testbed\n(testbed) root@e1db3683e3c1:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see that oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed from the local testbed directory. Now I need to locate the UserInfo endpoint implementation to examine and fix the issues mentioned in the task.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll find the UserInfo endpoint file in the oauthlib package to examine its implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -name \\\"userinfo.py\\\" -type f\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "797b96c0-6be0-4e3e-becc-a2785b9523a9-3", "metadata": {"category": "others"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "tb_simple_agent"}} -{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nImplicit grant flow broken after recent changes\n\n#### Description\n\nThe implicit grant flow is not working correctly. When making authorization requests with `response_type=token`, the flow seems to be inverted - tokens are being created when they shouldn't be and not created when they should be.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return 'http://back.to/me'\n\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return response_type == 'token'\n\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n\n# This should create a token response but doesn't work properly\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\nuri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\nprint(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\nprint(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n```\n\nThe authorization flow returns unexpected results and the token handling appears to be backwards from what's expected in the OAuth2 implicit flow specification.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -type f -name \\\"*.py\\\" | grep -v \\\"__pycache__\\\" | head -20\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -type f -name \"*.py\" | grep -v \"__pycache__\" | head -20; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/examples/skeleton_oauth2_web_application_server.py\n/testbed/examples/__init__.py\n/testbed/setup.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/signals.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/endpoints/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/endpoints/pre_configured.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/endpoints/userinfo.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/hybrid.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/base.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/implicit.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/authorization_code.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/refresh_token.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/exceptions.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/tokens.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/request_validator.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/__init__.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat /testbed/examples/skeleton_oauth2_web_application_server.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": " # You did save the redirect uri with the authorization code right?\n pass\n\n def validate_grant_type(self, client_id, grant_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Clients should only be allowed to use one type of grant.\n # In this case, it must be \"authorization_code\" or \"refresh_token\"\n pass\n\n def save_bearer_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Remember to associate it with request.scopes, request.user and\n # request.client. The two former will be set when you validate\n # the authorization code. Don't forget to save both the\n # access_token and the refresh_token and set expiration for the\n # access_token to now + expires_in seconds.\n pass\n\n def invalidate_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -name \\\"*.py\\\" -path \\\"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\\\" -exec basename {} \\\\; | sort -u\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": " # access_token and the refresh_token and set expiration for the\n # access_token to now + expires_in seconds.\n pass\n\n def invalidate_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec basename {} \\; | sort -u; tmux wait -S done\n__init__.py\nauthorization_code.py\nbase.py\nclient_credentials.py\nimplicit.py\nrefresh_token.py\nresource_owner_password_credentials.py\ntest_authorization_code.py\ntest_client_credentials.py\ntest_refresh_token.py\ntest_resource_owner_password.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -name \\\"*.py\\\" -path \\\"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\\\" -exec ls -la {} \\\\;\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec ls -la {} \\\\;\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n pass\n\n def invalidate_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec basename {} \\; | sort -u; tmux wait -S done\n__init__.py\nauthorization_code.py\nbase.py\nclient_credentials.py\nimplicit.py\nrefresh_token.py\nresource_owner_password_credentials.py\ntest_authorization_code.py\ntest_client_credentials.py\ntest_refresh_token.py\ntest_resource_owner_password.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec ls -la {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -path \\\"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\\\" -type d\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='find /testbed -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\" -type d\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec basename {} \\; | sort -u; tmux wait -S done\n__init__.py\nauthorization_code.py\nbase.py\nclient_credentials.py\nimplicit.py\nrefresh_token.py\nresource_owner_password_credentials.py\ntest_authorization_code.py\ntest_client_credentials.py\ntest_refresh_token.py\ntest_resource_owner_password.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec ls -la {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\" -type d; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\n/testbed/tests/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='cat /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n request.client, request):\n\n log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n request.client_id, request.response_type)\n raise errors.UnauthorizedClientError(request=request)\n\n # OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request as described by Section 3.3\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.3\n self.validate_scopes(request)\n\n request_info.update({\n 'client_id': request.client_id,\n 'redirect_uri': request.redirect_uri,\n 'response_type': request.response_type,\n 'state': request.state,\n 'request': request,\n })\n\n request_info = self._run_custom_validators(\n request,\n self.custom_validators.all_post,\n request_info\n )\n\n return request.scopes, request_info\n def _run_custom_validators(self,\n request,\n validations,\n request_info=None):\n # Make a copy so we don't modify the existing request_info dict\n request_info = {} if request_info is None else request_info.copy()\n # For implicit grant, auth_validators and token_validators are\n # basically equivalent since the token is returned from the\n # authorization endpoint.\n for validator in validations:\n result = validator(request)\n if result is not None:\n request_info.update(result)\n return request_info\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"wc -l /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='wc -l /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n request.client_id, request.response_type)\n raise errors.UnauthorizedClientError(request=request)\n\n # OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request as described by Section 3.3\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.3\n self.validate_scopes(request)\n\n request_info.update({\n 'client_id': request.client_id,\n 'redirect_uri': request.redirect_uri,\n 'response_type': request.response_type,\n 'state': request.state,\n 'request': request,\n })\n\n request_info = self._run_custom_validators(\n request,\n self.custom_validators.all_post,\n request_info\n )\n\n return request.scopes, request_info\n def _run_custom_validators(self,\n request,\n validations,\n request_info=None):\n # Make a copy so we don't modify the existing request_info dict\n request_info = {} if request_info is None else request_info.copy()\n # For implicit grant, auth_validators and token_validators are\n # basically equivalent since the token is returned from the\n # authorization endpoint.\n for validator in validations:\n result = validator(request)\n if result is not None:\n request_info.update(result)\n return request_info\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# wc -l /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n320 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"head -60 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='head -60 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n are typically implemented in a browser using a scripting language\n such as JavaScript.\n\n Unlike the authorization code grant type, in which the client makes\n separate requests for authorization and for an access token, the\n client receives the access token as the result of the authorization\n request.\n\n The implicit grant type does not include client authentication, and\n relies on the presence of the resource owner and the registration of\n the redirection URI. Because the access token is encoded into the\n redirection URI, it may be exposed to the resource owner and other\n applications residing on the same device::\n\n +----------+\n | Resource |\n | Owner |\n | |\n +----------+\n ^\n |\n (B)\n +----|-----+ Client Identifier +---------------+\n | -+----(A)-- & Redirection URI --->| |\n | User- | | Authorization |\n | Agent -|----(B)-- User authenticates -->| Server |\n | | | |\n | |<---(C)--- Redirection URI ----<| |\n | | with Access Token +---------------+\n | | in Fragment\n | | +---------------+\n | |----(D)--- Redirection URI ---->| Web-Hosted |\n | | without Fragment | Client |\n | | | Resource |\n | (F) |<---(E)------- Script ---------<| |\n | | +---------------+\n +-|--------+\n | |\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"def.*response_type\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n such as JavaScript.\n\n Unlike the authorization code grant type, in which the client makes\n separate requests for authorization and for an access token, the\n client receives the access token as the result of the authorization\n request.\n\n The implicit grant type does not include client authentication, and\n relies on the presence of the resource owner and the registration of\n the redirection URI. Because the access token is encoded into the\n redirection URI, it may be exposed to the resource owner and other\n applications residing on the same device::\n\n +----------+\n | Resource |\n | Owner |\n | |\n +----------+\n ^\n |\n (B)\n +----|-----+ Client Identifier +---------------+\n | -+----(A)-- & Redirection URI --->| |\n | User- | | Authorization |\n | Agent -|----(B)-- User authenticates -->| Server |\n | | | |\n | |<---(C)--- Redirection URI ----<| |\n | | with Access Token +---------------+\n | | in Fragment\n | | +---------------+\n | |----(D)--- Redirection URI ---->| Web-Hosted |\n | | without Fragment | Client |\n | | | Resource |\n | (F) |<---(E)------- Script ---------<| |\n | | +---------------+\n +-|--------+\n | |\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"response_type\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n | Owner |\n | |\n +----------+\n ^\n |\n (B)\n +----|-----+ Client Identifier +---------------+\n | -+----(A)-- & Redirection URI --->| |\n | User- | | Authorization |\n | Agent -|----(B)-- User authenticates -->| Server |\n | | | |\n | |<---(C)--- Redirection URI ----<| |\n | | with Access Token +---------------+\n | | in Fragment\n | | +---------------+\n | |----(D)--- Redirection URI ---->| Web-Hosted |\n | | without Fragment | Client |\n | | | Resource |\n | (F) |<---(E)------- Script ---------<| |\n | | +---------------+\n +-|--------+\n | |\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n115: response_types = ['token']\n130: response_type\n186: token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n194: if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n216: A normal error could be a missing response_type parameter or the client\n236: for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n272: if request.response_type is None:\n275: elif not set(request.response_type.split()).issubset(self.response_types):\n278: log.debug('Validating use of response_type token for client %r (%r).',\n280: if not self.request_validator.validate_response_type(request.client_id,\n281: request.response_type,\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes=\"sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\" is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n115: response_types = ['token']\n130: response_type\n186: token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n194: if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n216: A normal error could be a missing response_type parameter or the client\n236: for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n272: if request.response_type is None:\n275: elif not set(request.response_type.split()).issubset(self.response_types):\n278: log.debug('Validating use of response_type token for client %r (%r).',\n280: if not self.request_validator.validate_response_type(request.client_id,\n281: request.response_type,\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":false,\"timeout_sec\":1}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n115: response_types = ['token']\n130: response_type\n186: token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n194: if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n216: A normal error could be a missing response_type parameter or the client\n236: for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n272: if request.response_type is None:\n275: elif not set(request.response_type.split()).issubset(self.response_types):\n278: log.debug('Validating use of response_type token for client %r (%r).',\n280: if not self.request_validator.validate_response_type(request.client_id,\n281: request.response_type,\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: nano: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes=\"sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\" is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: nano: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"vi /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":false,\"timeout_sec\":1}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: nano: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# vi /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: vi: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat > test_implicit.py << 'EOF'\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f\\\"Token saved: {token}\\\")\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\\nuri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\n\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f\\\"Status: {status_code}\\\")\\nprint(f\\\"Headers: {headers}\\\")\\nEOF\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": " token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# vi /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: vi: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat > test_implicit.py << 'EOF'\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python test_implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "bash: vi: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat > test_implicit.py << 'EOF'\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_implicit.py\", line 2, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\nImportError: cannot import name 'RequestValidator' from 'oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749' (/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -name \\\"*.py\\\" -exec grep -l \\\"class RequestValidator\\\" {} \\\\;\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -exec grep -l \"class RequestValidator\" {} \\\\;\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_implicit.py\", line 2, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\nImportError: cannot import name 'RequestValidator' from 'oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749' (/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -exec grep -l \"class RequestValidator\" {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -r \\\"class RequestValidator\\\" /testbed --include=\\\"*.py\\\"\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='grep -r \"class RequestValidator\" /testbed --include=\"*.py\"\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_implicit.py\", line 2, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\nImportError: cannot import name 'RequestValidator' from 'oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749' (/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -exec grep -l \"class RequestValidator\" {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -r \"class RequestValidator\" /testbed --include=\"*.py\"; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator(OAuth2RequestValidator):\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator:\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc8628/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator(OAuth2RequestValidator):\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth1/rfc5849/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator:\n/testbed/tests/openid/connect/core/test_request_validator.py:class RequestValidatorTest(TestCase):\n/testbed/tests/oauth1/rfc5849/test_request_validator.py:class RequestValidatorTests(TestCase):\n/testbed/tests/oauth2/rfc6749/test_request_validator.py:class RequestValidatorTest(TestCase):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n "}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat > test_implicit_fixed.py << 'EOF'\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f\\\"Token saved: {token}\\\")\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\\nuri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\n\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f\\\"Status: {status_code}\\\")\\nprint(f\\\"Headers: {headers}\\\")\\nEOF\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat > test_implicit_fixed.py << 'EOF'\n'&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\nprint(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\nprint(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\nEOF\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python test_implicit_fixed.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\nprint(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\nprint(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\nEOF\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit_fixed.py; tmux wait -S done\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\n\\\"\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": ">\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit_fixed.py; tmux wait -S done\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \"; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\nprint(f'Body: {body}')\\n\\\" > debug_output.txt 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \"; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" > debug_output.txt 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat debug_output.txt\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \"; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" > debug_output.txt 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat debug_output.txt; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\nprint(f'Body: {body}')\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "> \" > debug_output.txt 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat debug_output.txt; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nimport logging\\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\nprint(f'Body: {body}')\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "> logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.authorization:Dispatching response_type token request to .\nvalidate_client_id: me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Validating redirection uri http://back.to/me for client me.\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.base:Using provided redirect_uri http://back.to/me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Client error during validation of . UnsupportedResponseTypeError('(unsu\npported_response_type) ').\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nimport logging\\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nprint('Available grant types:')\\nfor grant_type, grant in server._grant_types.items():\\n print(f' {grant_type}: {grant}')\\n if hasattr(grant, 'response_types'):\\n print(f' response_types: {grant.response_types}')\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> print('Available grant types:')\n> for grant_type, grant in server._grant_types.items():\n> print(f' {grant_type}: {grant}')\n> if hasattr(grant, 'response_types'):\n> print(f' response_types: {grant.response_types}')\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nAvailable grant types:\n authorization_code: \n response_types: ['code']\n refresh_token: \n response_types: ['code']\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.authorization:Dispatching response_type token request to .\nvalidate_client_id: me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Validating redirection uri http://back.to/me for client me.\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.base:Using provided redirect_uri http://back.to/me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Client error during validation of . UnsupportedResponseTypeError('(unsu\npported_response_type) ').\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nimport logging\\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.implicit import ImplicitGrant\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\ngrant = ImplicitGrant(validator)\\n\\nprint('Implicit grant response_types:', grant.response_types)\\n\\nfrom oauthlib.common import Request\\nrequest = Request('http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme')\\n\\nprint('Processing request...')\\nscopes, info = grant.validate_authorization_request(request)\\nprint('Scopes:', scopes)\\nprint('Info:', info)\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": ">\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> grant = ImplicitGrant(validator)\n>\n> print('Implicit grant response_types:', grant.response_types)\n>\n> from oauthlib.common import Request\n> request = Request('http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme')\n>\n> print('Processing request...')\n> scopes, info = grant.validate_authorization_request(request)\n> print('Scopes:', scopes)\n> print('Info:', info)\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nImplicit grant response_types: ['token']\nProcessing request...\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"\", line 32, in \n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 205, in validate_authorization_request\n return self.validate_token_request(request) and False\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 241, in validate_token_request\n if param in duplicate_params:\nNameError: name 'duplicate_params' is not defined\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '235,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> grant = ImplicitGrant(validator)\n>\n> print('Implicit grant response_types:', grant.response_types)\n>\n> from oauthlib.common import Request\n> request = Request('http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme')\n>\n> print('Processing request...')\n> scopes, info = grant.validate_authorization_request(request)\n> print('Scopes:', scopes)\n> print('Info:', info)\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nImplicit grant response_types: ['token']\nProcessing request...\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"\", line 32, in \n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 205, in validate_authorization_request\n return self.validate_token_request(request) and False\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 241, in validate_token_request\n if param in duplicate_params:\nNameError: name 'duplicate_params' is not defined\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '235,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '230,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '235,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '230,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n # redirection URI, or if the client identifier is missing or invalid,\n # the authorization server SHOULD inform the resource owner of the\n # error and MUST NOT automatically redirect the user-agent to the\n # invalid redirection URI.\n\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '220,240p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '220,240p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n Fatal errors occur when the client_id or redirect_uri is invalid or\n missing. These must be caught by the provider and handled, how this\n is done is outside of the scope of OAuthLib but showing an error\n page describing the issue is a good idea.\n \"\"\"\n\n # First check for fatal errors\n\n # If the request fails due to a missing, invalid, or mismatching\n # redirection URI, or if the client identifier is missing or invalid,\n # the authorization server SHOULD inform the resource owner of the\n # error and MUST NOT automatically redirect the user-agent to the\n # invalid redirection URI.\n\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"duplicate_params\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "uuid": "dec368b6-bef5-43f4-9c97-928c7a8855b0-61", "metadata": {"category": "others"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "tb_simple_agent"}} -{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task description and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFormat your response as JSON with the following structure:\n\n{\n \"analysis\": \"Analyze the current state based on the terminal output provided. What do you see? What has been accomplished? What still needs to be done?\",\n \"plan\": \"Describe your plan for the next steps. What commands will you run and why? Be specific about what you expect each command to accomplish.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cd project\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": true\n}\n\nRequired fields:\n- \"analysis\": Your analysis of the current situation\n- \"plan\": Your plan for the next steps\n- \"commands\": Array of command objects to execute\n\nOptional fields:\n- \"task_complete\": Boolean indicating if the task is complete (defaults to false if not present)\n\nCommand object structure:\n- \"keystrokes\": String containing the exact keystrokes to send to the terminal (required)\n- \"duration\": Number of seconds to wait for the command to complete before the next command will be executed (defaults to 1.0 if not present)\n\nIMPORTANT: The text inside \"keystrokes\" will be used completely verbatim as keystrokes. Write commands exactly as you want them sent to the terminal:\n- Most bash commands should end with a newline (\\n) to cause them to execute\n- For special key sequences, use tmux-style escape sequences:\n - C-c for Ctrl+C\n - C-d for Ctrl+D\n\nThe \"duration\" attribute specifies the number of seconds to wait for the command to complete (default: 1.0) before the next command will be executed. On immediate tasks (e.g., cd, ls, echo, cat) set a duration of 0.1 seconds. On commands (e.g., gcc, find, rustc) set a duration of 1.0 seconds. On slow commands (e.g., make, python3 [long running script], wget [file]) set an appropriate duration as you determine necessary.\n\nIt is better to set a smaller duration than a longer duration. It is always possible to wait again if the prior output has not finished, by running {\"keystrokes\": \"\", \"duration\": 10.0} on subsequent requests to wait longer. Never wait longer than 60 seconds; prefer to poll to see intermediate result status.\n\nImportant notes:\n- Each command's keystrokes are sent exactly as written to the terminal\n- Do not include extra whitespace before or after the keystrokes unless it's part of the intended command\n- Extra text before or after the JSON will generate warnings but be tolerated\n- The JSON must be valid - use proper escaping for quotes and special characters within strings\n- Commands array can be empty if you want to wait without taking action\n\nTask Description:\nOAuth2 metadata validation logic inverted causing incorrect validation errors\n\n#### Description\n\nThe metadata endpoint validation is throwing errors for valid configurations and accepting invalid ones. When creating a MetadataEndpoint with proper OAuth2 server configuration, validation errors are raised for correctly formatted URLs, required fields, and valid data types.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata import MetadataEndpoint\n\n# This should work but raises validation errors\nendpoint = Server(None)\nmetadata = MetadataEndpoint([endpoint], {\n 'issuer': 'https://foo.bar',\n 'authorization_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/authorize',\n 'token_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/token'\n})\n\n# Try to access the claims - this will raise ValueError\nprint(metadata.claims)\n```\n\nThe above code raises validation errors like:\n- \"key issuer: https://foo.bar must be an HTTPS URL\" (even though it is HTTPS)\n- \"key response_types_supported: ['code', 'token'] must be an Array\" (even though it is an array)\n- \"key authorization_endpoint is a mandatory metadata.\" (even when the field is present)\n\n#### Expected Behavior\n\nThe metadata endpoint should accept valid HTTPS URLs, properly formatted arrays, and not complain about missing required fields when they are present. Valid OAuth2 server configurations should generate proper metadata without validation errors.\n\n\nCurrent terminal state:\nCurrent Terminal Screen:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I need to investigate the OAuth2 metadata validation issue. The problem appears to be in the oauthlib library where validation logic is inverted - it's rejecting valid configurations and accepting invalid ones. I should first check if the oauthlib library is installed and explore its structure to understand the issue.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll start by checking if oauthlib is installed and then examine the metadata endpoint implementation to understand why the validation logic is inverted.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__version__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# python -c \"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__version__)\"\n3.2.2\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The oauthlib library version 3.2.2 is installed. Now I need to locate the metadata endpoint implementation to examine the validation logic. Based on the error description, the issue is in the oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata module.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll find the location of the oauthlib package and then examine the metadata endpoint implementation to identify where the validation logic is inverted.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# python -c \"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\"\n/testbed/oauthlib/__init__.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The oauthlib package is located at /testbed/oauthlib/, which suggests we're working in a development environment where the library has been cloned or installed locally. I need to examine the metadata endpoint implementation to find the validation logic that's inverted.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll navigate to the oauthlib directory and examine the metadata endpoint implementation to identify the bug in the validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/\ntotal 29\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 root root 10 Jul 15 17:41 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 9 root root 26 Jul 15 17:41 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 723 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 3 Jul 15 17:41 __pycache__\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13405 Jul 15 17:40 common.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4 Jul 15 17:40 oauth1\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 5 Jul 15 17:40 oauth2\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4 Jul 15 17:40 openid\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1496 Jul 15 17:40 signals.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6125 Jul 15 17:40 uri_validate.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I can see the oauthlib directory structure. The issue is related to OAuth2 metadata endpoints, so I need to look in the oauth2 directory, specifically in the endpoints subdirectory where the metadata.py file should be located.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll navigate to the oauth2 endpoints directory and examine the metadata.py file to find the validation logic bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/\ntotal 8\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 5 Jul 15 17:40 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 root root 10 Jul 15 17:41 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1806 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 root root 11 Jul 15 17:40 rfc6749\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 6 Jul 15 17:40 rfc8628\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I need to look in the rfc6749 directory which contains the core OAuth2 implementation. The metadata endpoint should be in the endpoints subdirectory there.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll navigate to the rfc6749/endpoints directory and check for the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/\ntotal 84\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 root root 11 Jul 15 17:40 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 5 Jul 15 17:40 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 404 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 9 Jul 15 17:40 clients\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 11 Oct 2 21:35 endpoints\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12942 Jul 15 17:40 errors.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 9 Jul 15 17:40 grant_types\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19096 Jul 15 17:40 parameters.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28848 Jul 15 17:40 request_validator.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11015 Jul 15 17:40 tokens.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2207 Jul 15 17:40 utils.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found the endpoints directory. Now I need to check if there's a metadata.py file in it, which should contain the validation logic that's inverted.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll list the contents of the endpoints directory to find the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/\ntotal 59\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 11 Oct 2 21:35 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 root root 11 Jul 15 17:40 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 553 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4584 Jul 15 17:40 authorization.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4119 Jul 15 17:40 base.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4946 Jul 15 17:40 introspect.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10608 Oct 2 21:35 metadata.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11954 Jul 15 17:40 pre_configured.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3248 Jul 15 17:40 resource.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5212 Jul 15 17:40 revocation.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4595 Jul 15 17:40 token.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found the metadata.py file. This is where the validation logic bug is likely located. I need to examine this file to find where the validation logic is inverted - where it's rejecting valid values and accepting invalid ones.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll examine the metadata.py file, looking specifically for the validation functions that check URLs, arrays, and required fields. The bug is likely in the validation logic where the return values or conditional checks are inverted.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def .*_validator\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def .*_validator\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I don't see any functions with '_validator' in their names. Let me look for validation-related functions using a broader search pattern.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll search for functions related to validation in the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def.*valid\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*valid\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n62: def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n87: def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n101: def validate_metadata_authorization(self, claims, endpoint):\n121: def validate_metadata_revocation(self, claims, endpoint):\n129: def validate_metadata_introspection(self, claims, endpoint):\n137: def validate_metadata_server(self):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found several validation functions in the metadata.py file. The main validation function is 'validate_metadata' at line 62, and there are other specific validation functions. The bug is likely in the 'validate_metadata' function where the logic is inverted. Let me examine this function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look at the 'validate_metadata' function implementation to identify the inverted logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '62,86p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '62,86p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n if not self.raise_errors:\n return\n\n if key not in array:\n if not is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n if isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n for elem in array[key]:\n if isinstance(elem, str):\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found the bug! In the 'validate_metadata' function, the logic is completely inverted:\\n\\n1. For required fields (line 68-69): It raises an error when the key is NOT in the array and is NOT required, which is backwards.\\n2. For HTTPS URLs (line 73-74): It raises an error when 'is_secure_transport' returns True, which means it's rejecting valid HTTPS URLs.\\n3. For URLs (line 78-79): It raises an error when the URL starts with 'http', rejecting valid URLs.\\n4. For arrays (line 82-83): It raises an error when the value IS a list, rejecting valid arrays.\\n5. For array elements (line 85-86): It raises an error when elements ARE strings, rejecting valid string arrays.\\n\\nAll these conditions should be inverted - they should raise errors when the conditions are NOT met, not when they ARE met.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the inverted logic in the validate_metadata function by correcting all the conditional checks.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've created a backup of the metadata.py file. Now I need to fix the inverted validation logic in the validate_metadata function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll edit the metadata.py file to correct all the inverted conditional checks in the validate_metadata function.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68,86s/^/# FIXED: /' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68,86s/^/# FIXED: /' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've commented out the original buggy validation logic. Now I need to add the corrected validation logic with the proper conditional checks.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll append the corrected validation logic right after the commented-out section.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '70i\\\\ if key not in array:\\\\n if is_required:\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\\\".format(key))\\\\n\\\\n elif is_issuer:\\\\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n if \\\"?\\\" in array[key] or \\\"&\\\" in array[key] or \\\"#\\\" in array[key]:\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n\\\\n elif is_url:\\\\n if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n\\\\n elif is_list:\\\\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an Array\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n for elem in array[key]:\\\\n if not isinstance(elem, str):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\\\".format(key, array[key], elem))' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '70i\\ if key not in array:\\n if is_required:\\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a manda\ntory metadata.\".format(key))\\n\\n elif is_issuer:\\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {}\n must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\\n if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\\n raise ValueError(\"\nkey {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_url:\\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\\n\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_list:\\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\\\nn raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\\n for elem in array[key]:\\n if not isinstance\n(elem, str):\\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rf\nc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've added the corrected validation logic. Now let's verify the changes by looking at the modified section of the file.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll display the modified section of the metadata.py file to confirm the changes are correct.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '68,95p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '68,95p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n# FIXED:\n if key not in array:\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n for elem in array[key]:\n if not isinstance(elem, str):\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n# FIXED: elif is_issuer:\n# FIXED: if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n# FIXED: if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n# FIXED:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The changes look good. I've successfully fixed the inverted validation logic:\\n\\n1. For required fields: Now correctly raises an error only when a required key is missing\\n2. For HTTPS URLs: Now correctly raises an error only when the URL is NOT secure transport\\n3. For URLs: Now correctly raises an error only when the URL does NOT start with 'http'\\n4. For arrays: Now correctly raises an error only when the value is NOT a list\\n5. For array elements: Now correctly raises an error only when elements are NOT strings\\n\\nNow I need to test if the fix works by running the example code from the issue description.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll create a test Python script with the example code from the issue description to verify that the fix works correctly.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > test_metadata.py << 'EOF'\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata import MetadataEndpoint\\n\\n# This should work but was raising validation errors\\nendpoint = Server(None)\\nmetadata = MetadataEndpoint([endpoint], {\\n 'issuer': 'https://foo.bar',\\n 'authorization_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/authorize',\\n 'token_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/token'\\n})\\n\\n# Try to access the claims - this should now work without raising ValueError\\nprint(metadata.claims)\\nEOF\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cat > test_metadata.py << 'EOF'\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata import MetadataEndpoint\n>\n> # This should work but was raising validation errors\n> endpoint = Server(None)\n> metadata = MetadataEndpoint([endpoint], {\n> 'issuer': 'https://foo.bar',\n> 'authorization_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/authorize',\n> 'token_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/token'\n> })\n>\n> # Try to access the claims - this should now work without raising ValueError\n> print(metadata.claims)\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've created a test script that reproduces the issue from the description. Now I'll run it to verify that the fix works correctly.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll execute the test script and check if it runs without raising validation errors.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python test_metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 2.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# python test_metadata.py\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_metadata.py\", line 1, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/__init__.py\", line 9, in \n from .rfc6749.clients import (\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py\", line 11, in \n from .endpoints.base import BaseEndpoint, catch_errors_and_unavailability\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/__init__.py\", line 10, in \n from .metadata import MetadataEndpoint\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\", line 70\n if key not in array:\nIndentationError: expected an indented block after 'if' statement on line 67\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"There's an indentation error in my fix. The issue is that I added the new code but didn't properly remove or comment out the old code, causing a syntax error. I need to fix the indentation and ensure the code structure is correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll examine the exact structure around line 70 and fix the indentation error by properly replacing the old code with the new code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '65,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '65,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n\n if key not in array:\n if not is_required:\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n# FIXED:\n if key not in array:\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I see the issue. I still have the old code partially there along with the new code, causing syntax errors. I need to properly replace the old validation logic with the new one.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll recreate the metadata.py file with just the corrected validation logic, removing the commented-out buggy code and fixing the indentation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've restored the original metadata.py file from the backup. Now I'll properly apply the fix with correct indentation and structure.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll use a more precise approach to replace just the validation logic in the validate_metadata function with the corrected version.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > validate_fix.py << 'EOF'\\n if key not in array:\\n if is_required:\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\\\".format(key))\\n\\n elif is_issuer:\\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n if \\\"?\\\" in array[key] or \\\"&\\\" in array[key] or \\\"#\\\" in array[key]:\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_url:\\n if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_list:\\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an Array\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n for elem in array[key]:\\n if not isinstance(elem, str):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\\\".format(key, array[key], elem))\\nEOF\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cat > validate_fix.py << 'EOF'\n> if key not in array:\n> if is_required:\n> raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n>\n> elif is_issuer:\n> if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n> if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n>\n> elif is_url:\n> if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n>\n> elif is_list:\n> if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n> for elem in array[key]:\n> if not isinstance(elem, str):\n> raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've created a file with the correct validation logic. Now I need to replace the buggy validation logic in the metadata.py file with this corrected version.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll use sed to replace the buggy validation logic (lines 68-86) with the corrected version from my validate_fix.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68,86d' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68,86d' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've deleted the buggy validation logic from lines 68-86. Now I need to insert the corrected validation logic in its place.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll insert the corrected validation logic at line 68 in the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68r validate_fix.py' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68r validate_fix.py' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've replaced the buggy validation logic with the corrected version. Let's verify that the file now has the correct structure.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll display the validate_metadata function to confirm the fix is correctly applied.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '62,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '62,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n if not self.raise_errors:\n return\n\n if key not in array:\n if not is_required:\n def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n if key not in array:\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"There's still an issue with the file structure. It seems I accidentally inserted the validation logic in the wrong place or there's some corruption. Let me check the file structure more carefully.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the structure of the entire validate_metadata function to see what happened.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def validate_metadata\\\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def validate_metadata\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n62: def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n63- if not self.raise_errors:\n64- return\n65-\n66- if key not in array:\n67- if not is_required:\n68: def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n69- if key not in array:\n70- if is_required:\n71- raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n72-\n73- elif is_issuer:\n74- if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n75- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n76- if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n77- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n78-\n79- elif is_url:\n80- if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n81- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n82-\n83- elif is_list:\n84- if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n85- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n86- for elem in array[key]:\n87- if not isinstance(elem, str):\n88- raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n89- \"\"\"\n90- If the token endpoint is used in the grant type, the value of this\n91- parameter MUST be the same as the value of the \"grant_type\"\n92- parameter passed to the token endpoint defined in the grant type\n93- definition.\n--\n102: def validate_metadata_authorization(self, claims, endpoint):\n103- claims.setdefault(\"response_types_supported\",\n104- list(filter(lambda x: x == \"none\", endpoint._response_types.keys())))\n105- claims.setdefault(\"response_modes_supported\", [\"query\"])\n106-\n107- if \"token\" not in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n108- self._grant_types.append(\"implicit\")\n109-\n110- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_types_supported\", is_required=False, is_list=True)\n111- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_modes_supported\", is_list=False)\n112- if \"code\" in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n113- code_grant = endpoint._response_types[\"code\"]\n114- if not isinstance(code_grant, grant_types.AuthorizationCodeGrant) and hasattr(code_grant, \"default_grant\"):\n115- code_grant = code_grant.default_grant\n116-\n117- claims.setdefault(\"code_challenge_methods_supported\",\n118- list(code_grant._code_challenge_methods.keys()))\n119- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"code_challenge_methods_supported\", is_list=False)\n120- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"authorization_endpoint\", is_required=False, is_url=True)\n121-\n122: def validate_metadata_revocation(self, claims, endpoint):\n123- claims.setdefault(\"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n124- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n125-\n126- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n127- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n128- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n129-\n130: def validate_metadata_introspection(self, claims, endpoint):\n131- claims.setdefault(\"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n132- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n133-\n134- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n135- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n136- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n137-\n138: def validate_metadata_server(self):\n139- \"\"\"\n140- Authorization servers can have metadata describing their\n141- configuration. The following authorization server metadata values\n142- are used by this specification. More details can be found in\n143- `RFC8414 section 2`_ :\n144-\n145- issuer\n146- REQUIRED\n147-\n148- authorization_endpoint\n149- URL of the authorization server's authorization endpoint\n150- [`RFC6749#Authorization`_]. This is REQUIRED unless no grant types are supported\n151- that use the authorization endpoint.\n152-\n153- token_endpoint\n154- URL of the authorization server's token endpoint [`RFC6749#Token`_]. This\n155- is REQUIRED unless only the implicit grant type is supported.\n156-\n157- scopes_supported\n158- RECOMMENDED.\n159-\n160- response_types_supported\n161- REQUIRED.\n162-\n163- Other OPTIONAL fields:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I see the issue now. My replacement corrupted the file structure. The validate_metadata function got mixed up with the validate_metadata_token function. I need to restore from backup and be more careful with my replacement.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll restore the original file and use a different approach to make the fix - I'll manually edit just the specific lines that need to be changed.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've restored the original file. Now I'll make a more precise fix by editing just the specific lines that contain the inverted logic.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll identify the exact lines with the inverted logic and fix them one by one using sed.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '67,70p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '67,70p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the first issue: line 68 has 'if not is_required' when it should be 'if is_required'. This is causing the validation to fail for required fields when they are actually present.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the first inverted logic by changing 'if not is_required' to 'if is_required'.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68s/if not is_required:/if is_required:/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68s/if not is_required:/if is_required:/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the first issue. Now I need to find and fix the other inverted logic issues in the function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look for the HTTPS URL validation logic and fix the inverted condition.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '72,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '72,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the second issue: line 73 raises an error when 'is_secure_transport' returns True, which means it's rejecting valid HTTPS URLs. It should only raise an error when 'is_secure_transport' returns False.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the full context of the HTTPS validation and fix the inverted logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '71,76p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '71,76p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the second issue: line 72 raises an error when 'utils.is_secure_transport(array[key])' is True, which means it's rejecting valid HTTPS URLs. This should be inverted to only raise an error when it's False.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the second inverted logic by changing the condition to 'if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key])'.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '72s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '72s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/met\nadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the second issue. Now I need to check if there are more inverted logic issues in the function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look for the URL validation logic and fix any inverted conditions.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77,80p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77,80p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the third issue: line 78 raises an error when the URL starts with 'http', which means it's rejecting valid URLs. This should be inverted to only raise an error when it does NOT start with 'http'.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the third inverted logic by changing the condition to 'if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\")'.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '78s/if array/if not array/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '78s/if array/if not array/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the third issue. Now I need to check if there are more inverted logic issues in the function, specifically with array validation.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look for the array validation logic and fix any inverted conditions.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '81,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n for elem in array[key]:\n if isinstance(elem, str):\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the fourth and fifth issues:\\n1. Line 82 raises an error when 'isinstance(array[key], list)' is True, which means it's rejecting valid arrays. This should be inverted.\\n2. Line 84 raises an error when 'isinstance(elem, str)' is True, which means it's rejecting valid string elements. This should also be inverted.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix both of these inverted logic issues by changing the conditions.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '82s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '82s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the fourth issue. Now I need to fix the fifth issue with the array element validation.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the fifth inverted logic by changing the condition for array element validation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '84s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '84s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've fixed all five instances of inverted validation logic in the validate_metadata function. Now let's verify the complete function to make sure it looks correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll display the entire validate_metadata function to confirm all fixes are properly applied.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def validate_metadata\\\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def validate_metadata\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n62: def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n63- if not self.raise_errors:\n64- return\n65-\n66- if key not in array:\n67- if not is_required:\n68- raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n69-\n70- elif is_issuer:\n71- if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n72- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n73- if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n74- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n75-\n76- elif is_url:\n77- if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n78- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n79-\n80- elif is_list:\n81- if isinstance(array[key], list):\n82- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n83- for elem in array[key]:\n84- if not isinstance(elem, str):\n85- raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n86-\n87: def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n88- \"\"\"\n89- If the token endpoint is used in the grant type, the value of this\n90- parameter MUST be the same as the value of the \"grant_type\"\n91- parameter passed to the token endpoint defined in the grant type\n92- definition.\n93- \"\"\"\n94- self._grant_types.extend(endpoint._grant_types.keys())\n95- claims.setdefault(\"token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n96-\n97- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n98- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n99- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"token_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n100-\n101: def validate_metadata_authorization(self, claims, endpoint):\n102- claims.setdefault(\"response_types_supported\",\n103- list(filter(lambda x: x == \"none\", endpoint._response_types.keys())))\n104- claims.setdefault(\"response_modes_supported\", [\"query\"])\n105-\n106- if \"token\" not in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n107- self._grant_types.append(\"implicit\")\n108-\n109- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_types_supported\", is_required=False, is_list=True)\n110- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_modes_supported\", is_list=False)\n111- if \"code\" in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n112- code_grant = endpoint._response_types[\"code\"]\n113- if not isinstance(code_grant, grant_types.AuthorizationCodeGrant) and hasattr(code_grant, \"default_grant\"):\n114- code_grant = code_grant.default_grant\n115-\n116- claims.setdefault(\"code_challenge_methods_supported\",\n117- list(code_grant._code_challenge_methods.keys()))\n118- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"code_challenge_methods_supported\", is_list=False)\n119- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"authorization_endpoint\", is_required=False, is_url=True)\n120-\n121: def validate_metadata_revocation(self, claims, endpoint):\n122- claims.setdefault(\"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n123- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n124-\n125- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n126- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n127- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n128-\n129: def validate_metadata_introspection(self, claims, endpoint):\n130- claims.setdefault(\"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n131- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n132-\n133- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n134- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n135- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n136-\n137: def validate_metadata_server(self):\n138- \"\"\"\n139- Authorization servers can have metadata describing their\n140- configuration. The following authorization server metadata values\n141- are used by this specification. More details can be found in\n142- `RFC8414 section 2`_ :\n143-\n144- issuer\n145- REQUIRED\n146-\n147- authorization_endpoint\n148- URL of the authorization server's authorization endpoint\n149- [`RFC6749#Authorization`_]. This is REQUIRED unless no grant types are supported\n150- that use the authorization endpoint.\n151-\n152- token_endpoint\n153- URL of the authorization server's token endpoint [`RFC6749#Token`_]. This\n154- is REQUIRED unless only the implicit grant type is supported.\n155-\n156- scopes_supported\n157- RECOMMENDED.\n158-\n159- response_types_supported\n160- REQUIRED.\n161-\n162- Other OPTIONAL fields:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I notice that my changes didn't take effect correctly. The lines still show the original (buggy) logic rather than the fixed logic. It seems my sed commands didn't work as expected. Let me check what happened and fix it properly.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the current state of the specific lines and apply the fixes again more carefully.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '67p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '67p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not is_required:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The first fix didn't take. Let me check all the lines that need to be fixed and apply the corrections again.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll reapply all the fixes to the validation logic using more specific sed commands.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '67s/not is_required/is_required/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '67s/not is_required/is_required/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me continue fixing the other inverted logic issues.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the HTTPS URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '71s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '71s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/met\nadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Continuing to fix the remaining inverted logic issues.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '77s/if array/key/.startswith(\\\"http\\\"):/if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '77s/if array/key/.startswith(\"http\"):/if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/end\npoints/metadata.py\nsed: -e expression #1, char 18: unknown option to `s'\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The sed command had an issue with the forward slashes. Let me fix it using a different delimiter.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll use a different delimiter for the sed command to fix the URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '77s|if array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\")|if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\")|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '77s|if array[key].startswith(\"http\")|if not array[key].startswith(\"http\")|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpo\nints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the URL validation logic. Now I need to fix the array validation logic.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the array validation logic by correcting the isinstance check.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '81s|if isinstance(array[key], list)|if not isinstance(array[key], list)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '81s|if isinstance(array[key], list)|if not isinstance(array[key], list)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoin\nts/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the array validation logic. Now I need to fix the array element validation logic.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the array element validation logic by correcting the isinstance check for elements.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '84s|if isinstance(elem, str)|if not isinstance(elem, str)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '84s|if isinstance(elem, str)|if not isinstance(elem, str)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've attempted to fix all the inverted logic issues. Let's verify that the changes were applied correctly.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the specific lines that should now have the corrected logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '67,68p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '67,68p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The first fix is correct. Let me check the HTTPS URL validation fix.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the HTTPS URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '71,72p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '71,72p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The HTTPS URL validation fix is correct. Let me check the URL validation fix.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77,78p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77,78p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The URL validation fix didn't take effect properly. Let me check what happened.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the exact content of line 77 and fix it again.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The URL validation fix didn't work correctly. Let me try again with a more specific command.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the URL validation logic again using a more precise sed command.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '77c\\\\ if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '77c\\ if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me verify that the URL validation fix is now correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check line 77 again to confirm the fix.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The URL validation fix is now correct. Let me check the array validation fix.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the array validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81,82p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '81,82p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The array validation fix didn't take effect properly either. Let me fix it.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the array validation logic using the change command.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '81c\\\\ if not isinstance(array[key], list):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}"}, {"role": "user", "content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '81c\\ if not isinstance(array[key], list):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me verify that the array validation fix is now correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check line 81 again to confirm the fix.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "uuid": "a300d664-72b9-4f3f-af14-50bdf2734dde-99", "metadata": {"category": "others"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "tb_simple_agent"}} +{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task description and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFormat your response as JSON with the following structure:\n\n{\n \"analysis\": \"Analyze the current state based on the terminal output provided. What do you see? What has been accomplished? What still needs to be done?\",\n \"plan\": \"Describe your plan for the next steps. What commands will you run and why? Be specific about what you expect each command to accomplish.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cd project\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": true\n}\n\nRequired fields:\n- \"analysis\": Your analysis of the current situation\n- \"plan\": Your plan for the next steps\n- \"commands\": Array of command objects to execute\n\nOptional fields:\n- \"task_complete\": Boolean indicating if the task is complete (defaults to false if not present)\n\nCommand object structure:\n- \"keystrokes\": String containing the exact keystrokes to send to the terminal (required)\n- \"duration\": Number of seconds to wait for the command to complete before the next command will be executed (defaults to 1.0 if not present)\n\nIMPORTANT: The text inside \"keystrokes\" will be used completely verbatim as keystrokes. Write commands exactly as you want them sent to the terminal:\n- Most bash commands should end with a newline (\\n) to cause them to execute\n- For special key sequences, use tmux-style escape sequences:\n - C-c for Ctrl+C\n - C-d for Ctrl+D\n\nThe \"duration\" attribute specifies the number of seconds to wait for the command to complete (default: 1.0) before the next command will be executed. On immediate tasks (e.g., cd, ls, echo, cat) set a duration of 0.1 seconds. On commands (e.g., gcc, find, rustc) set a duration of 1.0 seconds. On slow commands (e.g., make, python3 [long running script], wget [file]) set an appropriate duration as you determine necessary.\n\nIt is better to set a smaller duration than a longer duration. It is always possible to wait again if the prior output has not finished, by running {\"keystrokes\": \"\", \"duration\": 10.0} on subsequent requests to wait longer. Never wait longer than 60 seconds; prefer to poll to see intermediate result status.\n\nImportant notes:\n- Each command's keystrokes are sent exactly as written to the terminal\n- Do not include extra whitespace before or after the keystrokes unless it's part of the intended command\n- Extra text before or after the JSON will generate warnings but be tolerated\n- The JSON must be valid - use proper escaping for quotes and special characters within strings\n- Commands array can be empty if you want to wait without taking action\n\nTask Description:\nOAuth1 Client constructor swaps nonce and timestamp parameters\n\nWhen creating an OAuth1 Client with explicit nonce and timestamp values, the parameters get swapped internally. The nonce value is assigned to timestamp and vice versa.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth1 import Client\n\n# Create client with explicit nonce and timestamp\nclient = Client('client-key', nonce='my_nonce', timestamp='my_timestamp')\n\n# Check the values - they should match what we passed in\nprint(f\"Expected nonce: my_nonce, Got: {client.nonce}\")\nprint(f\"Expected timestamp: my_timestamp, Got: {client.timestamp}\")\n```\n\nExpected output:\n```\nExpected nonce: my_nonce, Got: my_nonce\nExpected timestamp: my_timestamp, Got: my_timestamp\n```\n\nActual output:\n```\nExpected nonce: my_nonce, Got: my_timestamp\nExpected timestamp: my_timestamp, Got: my_nonce\n```\n\nThis also affects OAuth signature generation since the wrong values are used for nonce and timestamp in the signature base string.\n\n\nCurrent terminal state:\nCurrent Terminal Screen:\n(testbed) root@b8ffb6895dc4:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I'm at a root prompt in a testbed environment. I need to investigate the OAuth1 client nonce/timestamp swapping issue. First, I'll need to check if the oauthlib package is installed and then create a Python script to reproduce the issue.\",\n \"plan\": \"1. Check if oauthlib is installed by trying to import it in Python\\n2. If not installed, install it using pip\\n3. Create a Python script that reproduces the issue\\n4. Run the script to confirm the bug\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth1; print('oauthlib is installed')\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "f2271e25-1984-4609-8890-42ecc8026684-1", "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_2"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "terminus_judge_simple_agent"}} +{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nWebApplicationServer initialization broken after recent changes\n\n#### Description\n\nThe WebApplicationServer class is not working properly - it seems like the constructor parameters got mixed up and some endpoints are being initialized with wrong arguments.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def save_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n pass\n\n def authenticate_client(self, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def validate_code(self, client_id, code, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def confirm_redirect_uri(self, client_id, code, redirect_uri, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def save_bearer_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n pass\n\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n\n# Try to create an authorization response\nauth_uri = 'https://example.com/auth?client_id=test&redirect_uri=https://example.com/callback&response_type=code'\nheaders, body, status = server.create_authorization_response(auth_uri, credentials={'user': 'test'})\n```\n\nThis should work for a basic OAuth2 authorization code flow, but instead it fails with various errors related to incorrect initialization of the server components.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@a8d5de6bbb94:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container. I need to investigate the WebApplicationServer initialization issue with OAuthlib. First, I should check if OAuthlib is installed and what version we're working with.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if OAuthlib is installed and what version we have to understand the environment better.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip list | grep oauth\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "40074f5b-e565-4865-bca8-31d121f1fb08-1", "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "terminus_judge_simple_agent"}} +{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nGrant type initialization breaks with None assignments\n\n#### Description\n\nGrant types are not initializing properly due to incorrect None assignments in the constructor. When creating grant type instances, several critical attributes are being set to None instead of their intended values, causing authorization flows to fail.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import AuthorizationCodeGrant\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n\n# Create a basic request validator\nvalidator = RequestValidator()\n\n# Try to create an authorization code grant\ngrant = AuthorizationCodeGrant(request_validator=validator)\n\n# The grant should have proper response_types but they're None\nprint(\"Response types:\", grant.response_types) # Expected: ['code'], Actual: None\nprint(\"Refresh token:\", grant.refresh_token) # Expected: True, Actual: None\nprint(\"Code modifiers:\", grant._code_modifiers) # Expected: [], Actual: None\n```\n\nThe grant types fail to work because essential attributes like `response_types`, `refresh_token`, and `_code_modifiers` are incorrectly set to None during initialization, breaking the OAuth2 authorization flow.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@18321e95c7c7:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to investigate the OAuthlib issue with grant type initialization. First, I should check if OAuthlib is installed and where it's located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed in the current environment and examine its location.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "3cc79a36-b6e4-4707-a3fa-21bfaaac29c0-1", "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "terminus_judge_simple_agent"}} +{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\n# [Bug]: PKCE code challenge verification is broken in AuthorizationCodeGrant\n\n## Bug summary\n\nThe PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) code challenge verification in the `AuthorizationCodeGrant` class is broken. The `code_challenge_method_s256` function is incorrectly implemented, causing verification to fail even with valid code verifiers.\n\n## Code for reproduction\n\n```python\nimport hashlib\nimport base64\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code import code_challenge_method_s256\n\n# Create a valid code verifier and challenge\nverifier = \"test_code_verifier_example_string_12345\"\nchallenge = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(\n hashlib.sha256(verifier.encode()).digest()\n).decode().rstrip('=')\n\nprint(f\"Verifier: {verifier}\")\nprint(f\"Challenge: {challenge}\")\n\n# This should return True for a valid verifier/challenge pair\nresult = code_challenge_method_s256(verifier, challenge)\nprint(f\"Verification result: {result}\")\n```\n\n## Actual outcome\n\n```\nVerifier: test_code_verifier_example_string_12345\nChallenge: E9Melhoa2OwvFrEMTJguCHaoeK1t8URWbuGJSstw-cM\nVerification result: False\n```\n\nThe verification fails even though the verifier and challenge are correctly generated according to the PKCE specification.\n\n## Expected outcome\n\n```\nVerifier: test_code_verifier_example_string_12345\nChallenge: E9Melhoa2OwvFrEMTJguCHaoeK1t8URWbuGJSstw-cM\nVerification result: True\n```\n\nThe verification should succeed when the challenge is correctly derived from the verifier.\n\n## Additional information\n\nThis issue affects all OAuth2 flows that use PKCE, including the authorization code grant type. The problem is in the implementation of the `code_challenge_method_s256` function, which is not correctly comparing the challenge and verifier.\n\n## Operating system\n\nAll platforms\n\n## Python version\n\n3.6+\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@94c8c77efd28:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to investigate the PKCE code challenge verification issue in the OAuthLib library. First, I should check if the oauthlib package is installed and where it's located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed and find its location to examine the problematic code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "21183f9c-700f-44cc-9c91-05d993ccfa83-1", "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "terminus_judge_simple_agent"}} +{"responses_create_params": {"input": [{"role": "user", "content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nVersionInfo equality comparison returns incorrect result\n\n#### Description\n\nThe `VersionInfo.__eq__` method is returning the wrong boolean value when comparing version instances. When two `VersionInfo` objects should be equal, the comparison returns `False`, and when they should be unequal, it returns `True`.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom redbot import VersionInfo\n\n# These should be equal but return False\nv1 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"1.0.0\")\nv2 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"1.0.0\")\nprint(f\"v1 == v2: {v1 == v2}\") # Expected: True, Actual: False\n\n# These should be unequal but return True \nv3 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"1.0.0\")\nv4 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"2.0.0\")\nprint(f\"v3 == v4: {v3 == v4}\") # Expected: False, Actual: True\n```\n\nThis affects any code that relies on version comparison equality, such as checking minimum/maximum bot version requirements in installable packages.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@0bb646c093ce:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n"}]}, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to first locate the redbot package and the VersionInfo class to investigate the equality comparison issue.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if the redbot package is installed and where it's located to begin investigating the VersionInfo equality issue.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import redbot; print(redbot.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "uuid": "613741e5-f1ac-42e3-9775-73a33d6b8808-1", "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "agent_ref": {"type": "responses_api_agents", "name": "terminus_judge_simple_agent"}} diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_metrics.json b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_metrics.json index cda790f1b..d17fc87f6 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_metrics.json +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_metrics.json @@ -16,17 +16,17 @@ }, "Json-dumped number of words (proxy for token count)": { "Total # non-null values": 5, - "Average": 3284.8, - "Min": 736.0, - "Max": 6512.0, - "Standard deviation": 2942.23 + "Average": 604.0, + "Min": 551.0, + "Max": 642.0, + "Standard deviation": 35.4 }, "Number of turns": { "Total # non-null values": 5, - "Average": 18.8, - "Min": 2.0, - "Max": 50.0, - "Standard deviation": 21.04 + "Average": 1.0, + "Min": 1.0, + "Max": 1.0, + "Standard deviation": 0.0 }, "Temperature": { "Total # non-null values": 0, diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_rollouts.jsonl b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_rollouts.jsonl index ac4e8b9ba..a465cc298 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_rollouts.jsonl +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/data/example_rollouts.jsonl @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nImplicit grant flow broken after recent changes\n\n#### Description\n\nThe implicit grant flow is not working correctly. When making authorization requests with `response_type=token`, the flow seems to be inverted - tokens are being created when they shouldn't be and not created when they should be.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return 'http://back.to/me'\n\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return response_type == 'token'\n\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n\n# This should create a token response but doesn't work properly\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\nuri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\nprint(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\nprint(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n```\n\nThe authorization flow returns unexpected results and the token handling appears to be backwards from what's expected in the OAuth2 implicit flow specification.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -type f -name \\\"*.py\\\" | grep -v \\\"__pycache__\\\" | head -20\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -type f -name \"*.py\" | grep -v \"__pycache__\" | head -20; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/examples/skeleton_oauth2_web_application_server.py\n/testbed/examples/__init__.py\n/testbed/setup.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/signals.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/endpoints/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/endpoints/pre_configured.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/endpoints/userinfo.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/hybrid.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/base.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/implicit.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/authorization_code.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/refresh_token.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/exceptions.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/tokens.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/request_validator.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/__init__.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat /testbed/examples/skeleton_oauth2_web_application_server.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": " # You did save the redirect uri with the authorization code right?\n pass\n\n def validate_grant_type(self, client_id, grant_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Clients should only be allowed to use one type of grant.\n # In this case, it must be \"authorization_code\" or \"refresh_token\"\n pass\n\n def save_bearer_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Remember to associate it with request.scopes, request.user and\n # request.client. The two former will be set when you validate\n # the authorization code. Don't forget to save both the\n # access_token and the refresh_token and set expiration for the\n # access_token to now + expires_in seconds.\n pass\n\n def invalidate_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -name \\\"*.py\\\" -path \\\"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\\\" -exec basename {} \\\\; | sort -u\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": " # access_token and the refresh_token and set expiration for the\n # access_token to now + expires_in seconds.\n pass\n\n def invalidate_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec basename {} \\; | sort -u; tmux wait -S done\n__init__.py\nauthorization_code.py\nbase.py\nclient_credentials.py\nimplicit.py\nrefresh_token.py\nresource_owner_password_credentials.py\ntest_authorization_code.py\ntest_client_credentials.py\ntest_refresh_token.py\ntest_resource_owner_password.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -name \\\"*.py\\\" -path \\\"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\\\" -exec ls -la {} \\\\;\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec ls -la {} \\\\;\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n pass\n\n def invalidate_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec basename {} \\; | sort -u; tmux wait -S done\n__init__.py\nauthorization_code.py\nbase.py\nclient_credentials.py\nimplicit.py\nrefresh_token.py\nresource_owner_password_credentials.py\ntest_authorization_code.py\ntest_client_credentials.py\ntest_refresh_token.py\ntest_resource_owner_password.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec ls -la {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -path \\\"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\\\" -type d\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='find /testbed -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\" -type d\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n # Authorization codes are use once, invalidate it when a Bearer token\n # has been acquired.\n pass\n\n # Protected resource request\n\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n # Remember to check expiration and scope membership\n pass\n\n # Token refresh request\n\n def get_original_scopes(self, refresh_token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n # Obtain the token associated with the given refresh_token and\n # return its scopes, these will be passed on to the refreshed\n # access token if the client did not specify a scope during the\n # request.\n pass\n\n\nvalidator = SkeletonValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec basename {} \\; | sort -u; tmux wait -S done\n__init__.py\nauthorization_code.py\nbase.py\nclient_credentials.py\nimplicit.py\nrefresh_token.py\nresource_owner_password_credentials.py\ntest_authorization_code.py\ntest_client_credentials.py\ntest_refresh_token.py\ntest_resource_owner_password.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/*\" -exec ls -la {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -path \"*/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\" -type d; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\n/testbed/tests/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='cat /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n request.client, request):\n\n log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n request.client_id, request.response_type)\n raise errors.UnauthorizedClientError(request=request)\n\n # OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request as described by Section 3.3\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.3\n self.validate_scopes(request)\n\n request_info.update({\n 'client_id': request.client_id,\n 'redirect_uri': request.redirect_uri,\n 'response_type': request.response_type,\n 'state': request.state,\n 'request': request,\n })\n\n request_info = self._run_custom_validators(\n request,\n self.custom_validators.all_post,\n request_info\n )\n\n return request.scopes, request_info\n def _run_custom_validators(self,\n request,\n validations,\n request_info=None):\n # Make a copy so we don't modify the existing request_info dict\n request_info = {} if request_info is None else request_info.copy()\n # For implicit grant, auth_validators and token_validators are\n # basically equivalent since the token is returned from the\n # authorization endpoint.\n for validator in validations:\n result = validator(request)\n if result is not None:\n request_info.update(result)\n return request_info\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"wc -l /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='wc -l /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n request.client_id, request.response_type)\n raise errors.UnauthorizedClientError(request=request)\n\n # OPTIONAL. The scope of the access request as described by Section 3.3\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.3\n self.validate_scopes(request)\n\n request_info.update({\n 'client_id': request.client_id,\n 'redirect_uri': request.redirect_uri,\n 'response_type': request.response_type,\n 'state': request.state,\n 'request': request,\n })\n\n request_info = self._run_custom_validators(\n request,\n self.custom_validators.all_post,\n request_info\n )\n\n return request.scopes, request_info\n def _run_custom_validators(self,\n request,\n validations,\n request_info=None):\n # Make a copy so we don't modify the existing request_info dict\n request_info = {} if request_info is None else request_info.copy()\n # For implicit grant, auth_validators and token_validators are\n # basically equivalent since the token is returned from the\n # authorization endpoint.\n for validator in validations:\n result = validator(request)\n if result is not None:\n request_info.update(result)\n return request_info\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# wc -l /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n320 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"head -60 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='head -60 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n are typically implemented in a browser using a scripting language\n such as JavaScript.\n\n Unlike the authorization code grant type, in which the client makes\n separate requests for authorization and for an access token, the\n client receives the access token as the result of the authorization\n request.\n\n The implicit grant type does not include client authentication, and\n relies on the presence of the resource owner and the registration of\n the redirection URI. Because the access token is encoded into the\n redirection URI, it may be exposed to the resource owner and other\n applications residing on the same device::\n\n +----------+\n | Resource |\n | Owner |\n | |\n +----------+\n ^\n |\n (B)\n +----|-----+ Client Identifier +---------------+\n | -+----(A)-- & Redirection URI --->| |\n | User- | | Authorization |\n | Agent -|----(B)-- User authenticates -->| Server |\n | | | |\n | |<---(C)--- Redirection URI ----<| |\n | | with Access Token +---------------+\n | | in Fragment\n | | +---------------+\n | |----(D)--- Redirection URI ---->| Web-Hosted |\n | | without Fragment | Client |\n | | | Resource |\n | (F) |<---(E)------- Script ---------<| |\n | | +---------------+\n +-|--------+\n | |\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"def.*response_type\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n such as JavaScript.\n\n Unlike the authorization code grant type, in which the client makes\n separate requests for authorization and for an access token, the\n client receives the access token as the result of the authorization\n request.\n\n The implicit grant type does not include client authentication, and\n relies on the presence of the resource owner and the registration of\n the redirection URI. Because the access token is encoded into the\n redirection URI, it may be exposed to the resource owner and other\n applications residing on the same device::\n\n +----------+\n | Resource |\n | Owner |\n | |\n +----------+\n ^\n |\n (B)\n +----|-----+ Client Identifier +---------------+\n | -+----(A)-- & Redirection URI --->| |\n | User- | | Authorization |\n | Agent -|----(B)-- User authenticates -->| Server |\n | | | |\n | |<---(C)--- Redirection URI ----<| |\n | | with Access Token +---------------+\n | | in Fragment\n | | +---------------+\n | |----(D)--- Redirection URI ---->| Web-Hosted |\n | | without Fragment | Client |\n | | | Resource |\n | (F) |<---(E)------- Script ---------<| |\n | | +---------------+\n +-|--------+\n | |\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"response_type\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n | Owner |\n | |\n +----------+\n ^\n |\n (B)\n +----|-----+ Client Identifier +---------------+\n | -+----(A)-- & Redirection URI --->| |\n | User- | | Authorization |\n | Agent -|----(B)-- User authenticates -->| Server |\n | | | |\n | |<---(C)--- Redirection URI ----<| |\n | | with Access Token +---------------+\n | | in Fragment\n | | +---------------+\n | |----(D)--- Redirection URI ---->| Web-Hosted |\n | | without Fragment | Client |\n | | | Resource |\n | (F) |<---(E)------- Script ---------<| |\n | | +---------------+\n +-|--------+\n | |\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n115: response_types = ['token']\n130: response_type\n186: token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n194: if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n216: A normal error could be a missing response_type parameter or the client\n236: for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n272: if request.response_type is None:\n275: elif not set(request.response_type.split()).issubset(self.response_types):\n278: log.debug('Validating use of response_type token for client %r (%r).',\n280: if not self.request_validator.validate_response_type(request.client_id,\n281: request.response_type,\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes=\"sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\" is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n (A) (G) Access Token\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n115: response_types = ['token']\n130: response_type\n186: token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n194: if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n216: A normal error could be a missing response_type parameter or the client\n236: for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n272: if request.response_type is None:\n275: elif not set(request.response_type.split()).issubset(self.response_types):\n278: log.debug('Validating use of response_type token for client %r (%r).',\n280: if not self.request_validator.validate_response_type(request.client_id,\n281: request.response_type,\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":false,\"timeout_sec\":1}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -n \"response_type\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n115: response_types = ['token']\n130: response_type\n186: token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n194: if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n216: A normal error could be a missing response_type parameter or the client\n236: for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n272: if request.response_type is None:\n275: elif not set(request.response_type.split()).issubset(self.response_types):\n278: log.debug('Validating use of response_type token for client %r (%r).',\n280: if not self.request_validator.validate_response_type(request.client_id,\n281: request.response_type,\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: nano: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes=\"sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\" is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n284: log.debug('Client %s is not authorized to use response_type %s.',\n285: request.client_id, request.response_type)\n295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: nano: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"vi /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":false,\"timeout_sec\":1}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "295: 'response_type': request.response_type,\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '180,200p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n except errors.OAuth2Error as e:\n log.debug('Client error during validation of %r. %r.', request, e)\n return {'Location': common.add_params_to_uri(request.redirect_uri, e.twotuples,\n fragment=True)}, None, 302\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n\n return self.prepare_authorization_response(\n request, {}, token, {}, 200)\n\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# nano /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: nano: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '185,195p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n token = token_handler.create_token(request, refresh_token=True) if 'token' not in request.response_type.split() else {}\n\n if request.state is None:\n token['state'] = request.state\n\n for modifier in self._token_modifiers:\n token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# vi /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: vi: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat > test_implicit.py << 'EOF'\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f\\\"Token saved: {token}\\\")\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\\nuri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\n\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f\\\"Status: {status_code}\\\")\\nprint(f\\\"Headers: {headers}\\\")\\nEOF\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": " token = modifier(request, token_handler, token)\n\n if \"token\" not in request.response_type.split():\n self.request_validator.save_token(token, request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# vi /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\nbash: vi: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat > test_implicit.py << 'EOF'\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python test_implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "bash: vi: command not found\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat > test_implicit.py << 'EOF'\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_implicit.py\", line 2, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\nImportError: cannot import name 'RequestValidator' from 'oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749' (/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"find /testbed -name \\\"*.py\\\" -exec grep -l \\\"class RequestValidator\\\" {} \\\\;\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -exec grep -l \"class RequestValidator\" {} \\\\;\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=5.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 5.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_implicit.py\", line 2, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\nImportError: cannot import name 'RequestValidator' from 'oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749' (/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -exec grep -l \"class RequestValidator\" {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -r \\\"class RequestValidator\\\" /testbed --include=\\\"*.py\\\"\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "Previous command:\nkeystrokes='grep -r \"class RequestValidator\" /testbed --include=\"*.py\"\\n' is_blocking=True timeout_sec=3.0\n\nThe previous command timed out after 3.0 seconds\n\nIt is possible that the command is not yet finished executing. If that is the case, then do nothing. It is also possible that you have entered an interactive shell and should continue sending keystrokes as normal.\n\nHere is the current state of the terminal:\n\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_implicit.py\", line 2, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\nImportError: cannot import name 'RequestValidator' from 'oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749' (/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# find /testbed -name \"*.py\" -exec grep -l \"class RequestValidator\" {} ;; tmux wait -S done\nbash: syntax error near unexpected token `;;'\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# grep -r \"class RequestValidator\" /testbed --include=\"*.py\"; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator(OAuth2RequestValidator):\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator:\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc8628/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator(OAuth2RequestValidator):\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth1/rfc5849/request_validator.py:class RequestValidator:\n/testbed/tests/openid/connect/core/test_request_validator.py:class RequestValidatorTest(TestCase):\n/testbed/tests/oauth1/rfc5849/test_request_validator.py:class RequestValidatorTests(TestCase):\n/testbed/tests/oauth2/rfc6749/test_request_validator.py:class RequestValidatorTest(TestCase):\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n ", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat > test_implicit_fixed.py << 'EOF'\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f\\\"Token saved: {token}\\\")\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\\nuri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\n\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f\\\"Status: {status_code}\\\")\\nprint(f\\\"Headers: {headers}\\\")\\nEOF\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat > test_implicit_fixed.py << 'EOF'\n'&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\nprint(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\nprint(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\nEOF\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python test_implicit_fixed.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\nprint(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\nprint(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\nEOF\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n>\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return response_type == 'token'\n>\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n>\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f\"Token saved: {token}\")\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz'\n> uri += '&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n>\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit_fixed.py; tmux wait -S done\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\n\\\"\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": ">\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f\"Status: {status_code}\")\n> print(f\"Headers: {headers}\")\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python test_implicit_fixed.py; tmux wait -S done\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \"; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\nprint(f'Body: {body}')\\n\\\" > debug_output.txt 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \"; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" > debug_output.txt 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"cat debug_output.txt\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \"; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" > debug_output.txt 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat debug_output.txt; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\nprint(f'Body: {body}')\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "> \" > debug_output.txt 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# cat debug_output.txt; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# python -c \"\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nvalidate_client_id: me\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nimport logging\\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\nprint(f'Body: {body}')\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "> logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\n>\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> print(f'Body: {body}')\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.authorization:Dispatching response_type token request to .\nvalidate_client_id: me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Validating redirection uri http://back.to/me for client me.\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.base:Using provided redirect_uri http://back.to/me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Client error during validation of . UnsupportedResponseTypeError('(unsu\npported_response_type) ').\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\nBody: None\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nimport logging\\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\\n\\nprint('Available grant types:')\\nfor grant_type, grant in server._grant_types.items():\\n print(f' {grant_type}: {grant}')\\n if hasattr(grant, 'response_types'):\\n print(f' response_types: {grant.response_types}')\\n\\nuri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\\nheaders, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\\nprint(f'Status: {status_code}')\\nprint(f'Headers: {headers}')\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> server = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n>\n> print('Available grant types:')\n> for grant_type, grant in server._grant_types.items():\n> print(f' {grant_type}: {grant}')\n> if hasattr(grant, 'response_types'):\n> print(f' response_types: {grant.response_types}')\n>\n> uri = 'http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme'\n> headers, body, status_code = server.create_authorization_response(uri, scopes=['all', 'of', 'them'])\n> print(f'Status: {status_code}')\n> print(f'Headers: {headers}')\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nAvailable grant types:\n authorization_code: \n response_types: ['code']\n refresh_token: \n response_types: ['code']\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.authorization:Dispatching response_type token request to .\nvalidate_client_id: me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Validating redirection uri http://back.to/me for client me.\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.base:Using provided redirect_uri http://back.to/me\nDEBUG:oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code:Client error during validation of . UnsupportedResponseTypeError('(unsu\npported_response_type) ').\nStatus: 302\nHeaders: {'Location': 'http://back.to/me?error=unsupported_response_type&state=xyz'}\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"python -c \\\"\\nimport logging\\nlogging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG)\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.implicit import ImplicitGrant\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.request_validator import RequestValidator\\n\\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\\n return True\\n def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return 'http://back.to/me'\\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\\n return response_type == 'token'\\n def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n return True\\n def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\\n print(f'Token saved: {token}')\\n\\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\\ngrant = ImplicitGrant(validator)\\n\\nprint('Implicit grant response_types:', grant.response_types)\\n\\nfrom oauthlib.common import Request\\nrequest = Request('http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme')\\n\\nprint('Processing request...')\\nscopes, info = grant.validate_authorization_request(request)\\nprint('Scopes:', scopes)\\nprint('Info:', info)\\n\\\" 2>&1\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":5}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": ">\n> class MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n> def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_client_id: {client_id}')\n> return True\n> def get_default_redirect_uri(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return 'http://back.to/me'\n> def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def validate_response_type(self, client_id, response_type, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'validate_response_type: {response_type}')\n> return response_type == 'token'\n> def validate_scopes(self, client_id, scopes, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> return True\n> def save_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n> print(f'Token saved: {token}')\n>\n> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> grant = ImplicitGrant(validator)\n>\n> print('Implicit grant response_types:', grant.response_types)\n>\n> from oauthlib.common import Request\n> request = Request('http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme')\n>\n> print('Processing request...')\n> scopes, info = grant.validate_authorization_request(request)\n> print('Scopes:', scopes)\n> print('Info:', info)\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nImplicit grant response_types: ['token']\nProcessing request...\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"\", line 32, in \n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 205, in validate_authorization_request\n return self.validate_token_request(request) and False\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 241, in validate_token_request\n if param in duplicate_params:\nNameError: name 'duplicate_params' is not defined\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '235,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "> validator = MyRequestValidator()\n> grant = ImplicitGrant(validator)\n>\n> print('Implicit grant response_types:', grant.response_types)\n>\n> from oauthlib.common import Request\n> request = Request('http://i.b/l?response_type=token&client_id=me&scope=all+of+them&state=xyz&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2Fback.to%2Fme')\n>\n> print('Processing request...')\n> scopes, info = grant.validate_authorization_request(request)\n> print('Scopes:', scopes)\n> print('Info:', info)\n> \" 2>&1; tmux wait -S done\nImplicit grant response_types: ['token']\nProcessing request...\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"\", line 32, in \n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 205, in validate_authorization_request\n return self.validate_token_request(request) and False\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\", line 241, in validate_token_request\n if param in duplicate_params:\nNameError: name 'duplicate_params' is not defined\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '235,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '230,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '235,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '230,250p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n # redirection URI, or if the client identifier is missing or invalid,\n # the authorization server SHOULD inform the resource owner of the\n # error and MUST NOT automatically redirect the user-agent to the\n # invalid redirection URI.\n\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"sed -n '220,240p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n if param in duplicate_params:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Duplicate %s parameter.' % param, request=request)\n\n # REQUIRED. The client identifier as described in Section 2.2.\n # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-2.2\n if not request.client_id:\n raise errors.MissingClientIdError(request=request)\n\n if not self.request_validator.validate_client_id(request.client_id, request):\n raise errors.InvalidClientIdError(request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed# sed -n '220,240p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py; tmux wait -S done\n\n Fatal errors occur when the client_id or redirect_uri is invalid or\n missing. These must be caught by the provider and handled, how this\n is done is outside of the scope of OAuthLib but showing an error\n page describing the issue is a good idea.\n \"\"\"\n\n # First check for fatal errors\n\n # If the request fails due to a missing, invalid, or mismatching\n # redirection URI, or if the client identifier is missing or invalid,\n # the authorization server SHOULD inform the resource owner of the\n # error and MUST NOT automatically redirect the user-agent to the\n # invalid redirection URI.\n\n # First check duplicate parameters\n for param in ('client_id', 'response_type', 'redirect_uri', 'scope', 'state'):\n try:\n pass\n except ValueError:\n raise errors.InvalidRequestFatalError(description='Unable to parse query string', request=request)\n(testbed) root@edd95cb223c2:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_09b03fba6f4963e2006970349ff8788190b064651c76323265", "created_at": 1768961184.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_09b03fba6f4963e200697034a214b48190b25930fdf3c15078", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"There is a NameError in implicit.py because the variable 'duplicate_params' is referenced without being defined. This is causing the validate_authorization_request for the implicit grant to fail before any correct flow can be tested.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's grep the file for any use or definition of 'duplicate_params' to confirm it's missing and gather more context. Then we'll plan to fix the NameError directly in the file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n duplicate_params /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 21191, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 160, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 21351}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961188, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 1.0, "expected_answer": "{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"duplicate_params\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"duplicate_params\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"There is a NameError in implicit.py because the variable 'duplicate_params' is referenced without being defined. This is causing the validate_authorization_request for the implicit grant to fail before any correct flow can be tested.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's grep the file for any use or definition of 'duplicate_params' to confirm it's missing and gather more context. Then we'll plan to fix the NameError directly in the file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n duplicate_params /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_02da0ac9f6e0e4a400697034a4f75c81939f263f88e446dd35", "created_at": 1768961189.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_02da0ac9f6e0e4a400697034a55d108193841aa2710b751283", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n- The GOLD command is: grep -n \"duplicate_params\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\n- The CANDIDATE command is: grep -n duplicate_params /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\n- The only difference is that the GOLD command puts \"duplicate_params\" in double quotes while the CANDIDATE does not.\n- In this context, since the string being searched does not include spaces or shell meta-characters, and in a grep command double quotes are not functionally different from not quoting it, the two are functionally equivalent.\n- The other fields (blocking, timeout, is_task_complete) are identical.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1312, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 162, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1474}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961193, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A=B]]"}, {"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"There is a NameError in implicit.py because the variable 'duplicate_params' is referenced without being defined. This is causing the validate_authorization_request for the implicit grant to fail before any correct flow can be tested.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's grep the file for any use or definition of 'duplicate_params' to confirm it's missing and gather more context. Then we'll plan to fix the NameError directly in the file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n duplicate_params /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\"state_analysis\":\":\",\"explanation\":\":\",\"commands\":[{\"keystrokes\":\"grep -n \\\"duplicate_params\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n\",\"is_blocking\":true,\"timeout_sec\":3}],\"is_task_complete\":false}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_05072ead3237427c00697034aa15fc819696f0c47d0c5c9293", "created_at": 1768961194.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_05072ead3237427c00697034aa78d48196ae119290699efb29", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Both the GOLD and CANDIDATE outputs feature the same command:\n\n- `grep -n duplicate_params /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n` (GOLD)\n- `grep -n \"duplicate_params\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\\n` (CANDIDATE)\n\nUsing quotes around the search pattern in the candidate's command does not change its functional behavior in grep. The state analysis, explanation content, and is_task_complete status align between both submissions.\n\nTherefore, the outputs are functionally equivalent.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1312, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 132, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1444}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961196, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A=B]]"}]} -{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task description and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFormat your response as JSON with the following structure:\n\n{\n \"analysis\": \"Analyze the current state based on the terminal output provided. What do you see? What has been accomplished? What still needs to be done?\",\n \"plan\": \"Describe your plan for the next steps. What commands will you run and why? Be specific about what you expect each command to accomplish.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cd project\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": true\n}\n\nRequired fields:\n- \"analysis\": Your analysis of the current situation\n- \"plan\": Your plan for the next steps\n- \"commands\": Array of command objects to execute\n\nOptional fields:\n- \"task_complete\": Boolean indicating if the task is complete (defaults to false if not present)\n\nCommand object structure:\n- \"keystrokes\": String containing the exact keystrokes to send to the terminal (required)\n- \"duration\": Number of seconds to wait for the command to complete before the next command will be executed (defaults to 1.0 if not present)\n\nIMPORTANT: The text inside \"keystrokes\" will be used completely verbatim as keystrokes. Write commands exactly as you want them sent to the terminal:\n- Most bash commands should end with a newline (\\n) to cause them to execute\n- For special key sequences, use tmux-style escape sequences:\n - C-c for Ctrl+C\n - C-d for Ctrl+D\n\nThe \"duration\" attribute specifies the number of seconds to wait for the command to complete (default: 1.0) before the next command will be executed. On immediate tasks (e.g., cd, ls, echo, cat) set a duration of 0.1 seconds. On commands (e.g., gcc, find, rustc) set a duration of 1.0 seconds. On slow commands (e.g., make, python3 [long running script], wget [file]) set an appropriate duration as you determine necessary.\n\nIt is better to set a smaller duration than a longer duration. It is always possible to wait again if the prior output has not finished, by running {\"keystrokes\": \"\", \"duration\": 10.0} on subsequent requests to wait longer. Never wait longer than 60 seconds; prefer to poll to see intermediate result status.\n\nImportant notes:\n- Each command's keystrokes are sent exactly as written to the terminal\n- Do not include extra whitespace before or after the keystrokes unless it's part of the intended command\n- Extra text before or after the JSON will generate warnings but be tolerated\n- The JSON must be valid - use proper escaping for quotes and special characters within strings\n- Commands array can be empty if you want to wait without taking action\n\nTask Description:\nOAuth2 metadata validation logic inverted causing incorrect validation errors\n\n#### Description\n\nThe metadata endpoint validation is throwing errors for valid configurations and accepting invalid ones. When creating a MetadataEndpoint with proper OAuth2 server configuration, validation errors are raised for correctly formatted URLs, required fields, and valid data types.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata import MetadataEndpoint\n\n# This should work but raises validation errors\nendpoint = Server(None)\nmetadata = MetadataEndpoint([endpoint], {\n 'issuer': 'https://foo.bar',\n 'authorization_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/authorize',\n 'token_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/token'\n})\n\n# Try to access the claims - this will raise ValueError\nprint(metadata.claims)\n```\n\nThe above code raises validation errors like:\n- \"key issuer: https://foo.bar must be an HTTPS URL\" (even though it is HTTPS)\n- \"key response_types_supported: ['code', 'token'] must be an Array\" (even though it is an array)\n- \"key authorization_endpoint is a mandatory metadata.\" (even when the field is present)\n\n#### Expected Behavior\n\nThe metadata endpoint should accept valid HTTPS URLs, properly formatted arrays, and not complain about missing required fields when they are present. Valid OAuth2 server configurations should generate proper metadata without validation errors.\n\n\nCurrent terminal state:\nCurrent Terminal Screen:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I need to investigate the OAuth2 metadata validation issue. The problem appears to be in the oauthlib library where validation logic is inverted - it's rejecting valid configurations and accepting invalid ones. I should first check if the oauthlib library is installed and explore its structure to understand the issue.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll start by checking if oauthlib is installed and then examine the metadata endpoint implementation to understand why the validation logic is inverted.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__version__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# python -c \"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__version__)\"\n3.2.2\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The oauthlib library version 3.2.2 is installed. Now I need to locate the metadata endpoint implementation to examine the validation logic. Based on the error description, the issue is in the oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata module.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll find the location of the oauthlib package and then examine the metadata endpoint implementation to identify where the validation logic is inverted.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# python -c \"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\"\n/testbed/oauthlib/__init__.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The oauthlib package is located at /testbed/oauthlib/, which suggests we're working in a development environment where the library has been cloned or installed locally. I need to examine the metadata endpoint implementation to find the validation logic that's inverted.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll navigate to the oauthlib directory and examine the metadata endpoint implementation to identify the bug in the validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/\ntotal 29\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 root root 10 Jul 15 17:41 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 9 root root 26 Jul 15 17:41 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 723 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 3 Jul 15 17:41 __pycache__\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13405 Jul 15 17:40 common.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4 Jul 15 17:40 oauth1\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 5 Jul 15 17:40 oauth2\ndrwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4 Jul 15 17:40 openid\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1496 Jul 15 17:40 signals.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6125 Jul 15 17:40 uri_validate.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I can see the oauthlib directory structure. The issue is related to OAuth2 metadata endpoints, so I need to look in the oauth2 directory, specifically in the endpoints subdirectory where the metadata.py file should be located.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll navigate to the oauth2 endpoints directory and examine the metadata.py file to find the validation logic bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/\ntotal 8\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 5 Jul 15 17:40 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 6 root root 10 Jul 15 17:41 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1806 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 root root 11 Jul 15 17:40 rfc6749\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 6 Jul 15 17:40 rfc8628\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I need to look in the rfc6749 directory which contains the core OAuth2 implementation. The metadata endpoint should be in the endpoints subdirectory there.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll navigate to the rfc6749/endpoints directory and check for the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/\ntotal 84\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 root root 11 Jul 15 17:40 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 4 root root 5 Jul 15 17:40 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 404 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 9 Jul 15 17:40 clients\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 11 Oct 2 21:35 endpoints\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12942 Jul 15 17:40 errors.py\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 9 Jul 15 17:40 grant_types\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19096 Jul 15 17:40 parameters.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 28848 Jul 15 17:40 request_validator.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11015 Jul 15 17:40 tokens.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2207 Jul 15 17:40 utils.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found the endpoints directory. Now I need to check if there's a metadata.py file in it, which should contain the validation logic that's inverted.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll list the contents of the endpoints directory to find the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# ls -la /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/\ntotal 59\ndrwxr-xr-x 2 root root 11 Oct 2 21:35 .\ndrwxr-xr-x 5 root root 11 Jul 15 17:40 ..\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 553 Jul 15 17:40 __init__.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4584 Jul 15 17:40 authorization.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4119 Jul 15 17:40 base.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4946 Jul 15 17:40 introspect.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10608 Oct 2 21:35 metadata.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11954 Jul 15 17:40 pre_configured.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3248 Jul 15 17:40 resource.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5212 Jul 15 17:40 revocation.py\n-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4595 Jul 15 17:40 token.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found the metadata.py file. This is where the validation logic bug is likely located. I need to examine this file to find where the validation logic is inverted - where it's rejecting valid values and accepting invalid ones.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll examine the metadata.py file, looking specifically for the validation functions that check URLs, arrays, and required fields. The bug is likely in the validation logic where the return values or conditional checks are inverted.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def .*_validator\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def .*_validator\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I don't see any functions with '_validator' in their names. Let me look for validation-related functions using a broader search pattern.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll search for functions related to validation in the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def.*valid\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def.*valid\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n62: def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n87: def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n101: def validate_metadata_authorization(self, claims, endpoint):\n121: def validate_metadata_revocation(self, claims, endpoint):\n129: def validate_metadata_introspection(self, claims, endpoint):\n137: def validate_metadata_server(self):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found several validation functions in the metadata.py file. The main validation function is 'validate_metadata' at line 62, and there are other specific validation functions. The bug is likely in the 'validate_metadata' function where the logic is inverted. Let me examine this function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look at the 'validate_metadata' function implementation to identify the inverted logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '62,86p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '62,86p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n if not self.raise_errors:\n return\n\n if key not in array:\n if not is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n if isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n for elem in array[key]:\n if isinstance(elem, str):\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I found the bug! In the 'validate_metadata' function, the logic is completely inverted:\\n\\n1. For required fields (line 68-69): It raises an error when the key is NOT in the array and is NOT required, which is backwards.\\n2. For HTTPS URLs (line 73-74): It raises an error when 'is_secure_transport' returns True, which means it's rejecting valid HTTPS URLs.\\n3. For URLs (line 78-79): It raises an error when the URL starts with 'http', rejecting valid URLs.\\n4. For arrays (line 82-83): It raises an error when the value IS a list, rejecting valid arrays.\\n5. For array elements (line 85-86): It raises an error when elements ARE strings, rejecting valid string arrays.\\n\\nAll these conditions should be inverted - they should raise errors when the conditions are NOT met, not when they ARE met.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the inverted logic in the validate_metadata function by correcting all the conditional checks.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've created a backup of the metadata.py file. Now I need to fix the inverted validation logic in the validate_metadata function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll edit the metadata.py file to correct all the inverted conditional checks in the validate_metadata function.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68,86s/^/# FIXED: /' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68,86s/^/# FIXED: /' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've commented out the original buggy validation logic. Now I need to add the corrected validation logic with the proper conditional checks.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll append the corrected validation logic right after the commented-out section.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '70i\\\\ if key not in array:\\\\n if is_required:\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\\\".format(key))\\\\n\\\\n elif is_issuer:\\\\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n if \\\"?\\\" in array[key] or \\\"&\\\" in array[key] or \\\"#\\\" in array[key]:\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n\\\\n elif is_url:\\\\n if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n\\\\n elif is_list:\\\\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an Array\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\\\n for elem in array[key]:\\\\n if not isinstance(elem, str):\\\\n raise ValueError(\\\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\\\".format(key, array[key], elem))' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '70i\\ if key not in array:\\n if is_required:\\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a manda\ntory metadata.\".format(key))\\n\\n elif is_issuer:\\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {}\n must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\\n if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\\n raise ValueError(\"\nkey {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_url:\\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\\n\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_list:\\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\\\nn raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\\n for elem in array[key]:\\n if not isinstance\n(elem, str):\\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rf\nc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've added the corrected validation logic. Now let's verify the changes by looking at the modified section of the file.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll display the modified section of the metadata.py file to confirm the changes are correct.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '68,95p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '68,95p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n# FIXED:\n if key not in array:\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n for elem in array[key]:\n if not isinstance(elem, str):\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n# FIXED: elif is_issuer:\n# FIXED: if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n# FIXED: if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n# FIXED:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The changes look good. I've successfully fixed the inverted validation logic:\\n\\n1. For required fields: Now correctly raises an error only when a required key is missing\\n2. For HTTPS URLs: Now correctly raises an error only when the URL is NOT secure transport\\n3. For URLs: Now correctly raises an error only when the URL does NOT start with 'http'\\n4. For arrays: Now correctly raises an error only when the value is NOT a list\\n5. For array elements: Now correctly raises an error only when elements are NOT strings\\n\\nNow I need to test if the fix works by running the example code from the issue description.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll create a test Python script with the example code from the issue description to verify that the fix works correctly.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > test_metadata.py << 'EOF'\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata import MetadataEndpoint\\n\\n# This should work but was raising validation errors\\nendpoint = Server(None)\\nmetadata = MetadataEndpoint([endpoint], {\\n 'issuer': 'https://foo.bar',\\n 'authorization_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/authorize',\\n 'token_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/token'\\n})\\n\\n# Try to access the claims - this should now work without raising ValueError\\nprint(metadata.claims)\\nEOF\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cat > test_metadata.py << 'EOF'\n> from oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\n> from oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.endpoints.metadata import MetadataEndpoint\n>\n> # This should work but was raising validation errors\n> endpoint = Server(None)\n> metadata = MetadataEndpoint([endpoint], {\n> 'issuer': 'https://foo.bar',\n> 'authorization_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/authorize',\n> 'token_endpoint': 'https://foo.bar/token'\n> })\n>\n> # Try to access the claims - this should now work without raising ValueError\n> print(metadata.claims)\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've created a test script that reproduces the issue from the description. Now I'll run it to verify that the fix works correctly.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll execute the test script and check if it runs without raising validation errors.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python test_metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 2.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# python test_metadata.py\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/testbed/test_metadata.py\", line 1, in \n from oauthlib.oauth2 import Server\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/__init__.py\", line 9, in \n from .rfc6749.clients import (\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/__init__.py\", line 11, in \n from .endpoints.base import BaseEndpoint, catch_errors_and_unavailability\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/__init__.py\", line 10, in \n from .metadata import MetadataEndpoint\n File \"/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\", line 70\n if key not in array:\nIndentationError: expected an indented block after 'if' statement on line 67\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"There's an indentation error in my fix. The issue is that I added the new code but didn't properly remove or comment out the old code, causing a syntax error. I need to fix the indentation and ensure the code structure is correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll examine the exact structure around line 70 and fix the indentation error by properly replacing the old code with the new code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '65,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '65,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n\n if key not in array:\n if not is_required:\n# FIXED: raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n# FIXED:\n if key not in array:\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I see the issue. I still have the old code partially there along with the new code, causing syntax errors. I need to properly replace the old validation logic with the new one.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll recreate the metadata.py file with just the corrected validation logic, removing the commented-out buggy code and fixing the indentation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've restored the original metadata.py file from the backup. Now I'll properly apply the fix with correct indentation and structure.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll use a more precise approach to replace just the validation logic in the validate_metadata function with the corrected version.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > validate_fix.py << 'EOF'\\n if key not in array:\\n if is_required:\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\\\".format(key))\\n\\n elif is_issuer:\\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n if \\\"?\\\" in array[key] or \\\"&\\\" in array[key] or \\\"#\\\" in array[key]:\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_url:\\n if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an URL\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n\\n elif is_list:\\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"key {}: {} must be an Array\\\".format(key, array[key]))\\n for elem in array[key]:\\n if not isinstance(elem, str):\\n raise ValueError(\\\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\\\".format(key, array[key], elem))\\nEOF\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cat > validate_fix.py << 'EOF'\n> if key not in array:\n> if is_required:\n> raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n>\n> elif is_issuer:\n> if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n> if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n>\n> elif is_url:\n> if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n>\n> elif is_list:\n> if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n> raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n> for elem in array[key]:\n> if not isinstance(elem, str):\n> raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n> EOF\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've created a file with the correct validation logic. Now I need to replace the buggy validation logic in the metadata.py file with this corrected version.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll use sed to replace the buggy validation logic (lines 68-86) with the corrected version from my validate_fix.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68,86d' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68,86d' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've deleted the buggy validation logic from lines 68-86. Now I need to insert the corrected validation logic in its place.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll insert the corrected validation logic at line 68 in the metadata.py file.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68r validate_fix.py' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68r validate_fix.py' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've replaced the buggy validation logic with the corrected version. Let's verify that the file now has the correct structure.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll display the validate_metadata function to confirm the fix is correctly applied.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '62,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '62,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n if not self.raise_errors:\n return\n\n if key not in array:\n if not is_required:\n def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n if key not in array:\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"There's still an issue with the file structure. It seems I accidentally inserted the validation logic in the wrong place or there's some corruption. Let me check the file structure more carefully.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the structure of the entire validate_metadata function to see what happened.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def validate_metadata\\\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def validate_metadata\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n62: def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n63- if not self.raise_errors:\n64- return\n65-\n66- if key not in array:\n67- if not is_required:\n68: def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n69- if key not in array:\n70- if is_required:\n71- raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n72-\n73- elif is_issuer:\n74- if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n75- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n76- if \"?\" in array[key] or \"&\" in array[key] or \"#\" in array[key]:\n77- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n78-\n79- elif is_url:\n80- if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n81- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n82-\n83- elif is_list:\n84- if not isinstance(array[key], list):\n85- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n86- for elem in array[key]:\n87- if not isinstance(elem, str):\n88- raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n89- \"\"\"\n90- If the token endpoint is used in the grant type, the value of this\n91- parameter MUST be the same as the value of the \"grant_type\"\n92- parameter passed to the token endpoint defined in the grant type\n93- definition.\n--\n102: def validate_metadata_authorization(self, claims, endpoint):\n103- claims.setdefault(\"response_types_supported\",\n104- list(filter(lambda x: x == \"none\", endpoint._response_types.keys())))\n105- claims.setdefault(\"response_modes_supported\", [\"query\"])\n106-\n107- if \"token\" not in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n108- self._grant_types.append(\"implicit\")\n109-\n110- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_types_supported\", is_required=False, is_list=True)\n111- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_modes_supported\", is_list=False)\n112- if \"code\" in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n113- code_grant = endpoint._response_types[\"code\"]\n114- if not isinstance(code_grant, grant_types.AuthorizationCodeGrant) and hasattr(code_grant, \"default_grant\"):\n115- code_grant = code_grant.default_grant\n116-\n117- claims.setdefault(\"code_challenge_methods_supported\",\n118- list(code_grant._code_challenge_methods.keys()))\n119- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"code_challenge_methods_supported\", is_list=False)\n120- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"authorization_endpoint\", is_required=False, is_url=True)\n121-\n122: def validate_metadata_revocation(self, claims, endpoint):\n123- claims.setdefault(\"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n124- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n125-\n126- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n127- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n128- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n129-\n130: def validate_metadata_introspection(self, claims, endpoint):\n131- claims.setdefault(\"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n132- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n133-\n134- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n135- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n136- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n137-\n138: def validate_metadata_server(self):\n139- \"\"\"\n140- Authorization servers can have metadata describing their\n141- configuration. The following authorization server metadata values\n142- are used by this specification. More details can be found in\n143- `RFC8414 section 2`_ :\n144-\n145- issuer\n146- REQUIRED\n147-\n148- authorization_endpoint\n149- URL of the authorization server's authorization endpoint\n150- [`RFC6749#Authorization`_]. This is REQUIRED unless no grant types are supported\n151- that use the authorization endpoint.\n152-\n153- token_endpoint\n154- URL of the authorization server's token endpoint [`RFC6749#Token`_]. This\n155- is REQUIRED unless only the implicit grant type is supported.\n156-\n157- scopes_supported\n158- RECOMMENDED.\n159-\n160- response_types_supported\n161- REQUIRED.\n162-\n163- Other OPTIONAL fields:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I see the issue now. My replacement corrupted the file structure. The validate_metadata function got mixed up with the validate_metadata_token function. I need to restore from backup and be more careful with my replacement.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll restore the original file and use a different approach to make the fix - I'll manually edit just the specific lines that need to be changed.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# cp /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py.backup /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've restored the original file. Now I'll make a more precise fix by editing just the specific lines that contain the inverted logic.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll identify the exact lines with the inverted logic and fix them one by one using sed.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '67,70p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '67,70p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n\n elif is_issuer:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the first issue: line 68 has 'if not is_required' when it should be 'if is_required'. This is causing the validation to fail for required fields when they are actually present.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the first inverted logic by changing 'if not is_required' to 'if is_required'.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '68s/if not is_required:/if is_required:/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '68s/if not is_required:/if is_required:/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the first issue. Now I need to find and fix the other inverted logic issues in the function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look for the HTTPS URL validation logic and fix the inverted condition.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '72,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '72,75p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the second issue: line 73 raises an error when 'is_secure_transport' returns True, which means it's rejecting valid HTTPS URLs. It should only raise an error when 'is_secure_transport' returns False.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the full context of the HTTPS validation and fix the inverted logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '71,76p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '71,76p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_url:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the second issue: line 72 raises an error when 'utils.is_secure_transport(array[key])' is True, which means it's rejecting valid HTTPS URLs. This should be inverted to only raise an error when it's False.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the second inverted logic by changing the condition to 'if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key])'.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '72s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '72s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/met\nadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the second issue. Now I need to check if there are more inverted logic issues in the function.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look for the URL validation logic and fix any inverted conditions.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77,80p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77,80p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n\n elif is_list:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the third issue: line 78 raises an error when the URL starts with 'http', which means it's rejecting valid URLs. This should be inverted to only raise an error when it does NOT start with 'http'.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the third inverted logic by changing the condition to 'if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\")'.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '78s/if array/if not array/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '78s/if array/if not array/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the third issue. Now I need to check if there are more inverted logic issues in the function, specifically with array validation.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll look for the array validation logic and fix any inverted conditions.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '81,85p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n for elem in array[key]:\n if isinstance(elem, str):\n raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Found the fourth and fifth issues:\\n1. Line 82 raises an error when 'isinstance(array[key], list)' is True, which means it's rejecting valid arrays. This should be inverted.\\n2. Line 84 raises an error when 'isinstance(elem, str)' is True, which means it's rejecting valid string elements. This should also be inverted.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix both of these inverted logic issues by changing the conditions.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '82s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '82s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the fourth issue. Now I need to fix the fifth issue with the array element validation.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the fifth inverted logic by changing the condition for array element validation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '84s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '84s/if isinstance/if not isinstance/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've fixed all five instances of inverted validation logic in the validate_metadata function. Now let's verify the complete function to make sure it looks correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll display the entire validate_metadata function to confirm all fixes are properly applied.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\"def validate_metadata\\\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# grep -n \"def validate_metadata\" -A 25 /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n62: def validate_metadata(self, array, key, is_required=False, is_list=False, is_url=False, is_issuer=False):\n63- if not self.raise_errors:\n64- return\n65-\n66- if key not in array:\n67- if not is_required:\n68- raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n69-\n70- elif is_issuer:\n71- if utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n72- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n73- if \"?\" not in array[key] and \"&\" not in array[key] and \"#\" not in array[key]:\n74- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must not contain query or fragment components\".format(key, array[key]))\n75-\n76- elif is_url:\n77- if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n78- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n79-\n80- elif is_list:\n81- if isinstance(array[key], list):\n82- raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n83- for elem in array[key]:\n84- if not isinstance(elem, str):\n85- raise ValueError(\"array {}: {} must contains only string (not {})\".format(key, array[key], elem))\n86-\n87: def validate_metadata_token(self, claims, endpoint):\n88- \"\"\"\n89- If the token endpoint is used in the grant type, the value of this\n90- parameter MUST be the same as the value of the \"grant_type\"\n91- parameter passed to the token endpoint defined in the grant type\n92- definition.\n93- \"\"\"\n94- self._grant_types.extend(endpoint._grant_types.keys())\n95- claims.setdefault(\"token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n96-\n97- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n98- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n99- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"token_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n100-\n101: def validate_metadata_authorization(self, claims, endpoint):\n102- claims.setdefault(\"response_types_supported\",\n103- list(filter(lambda x: x == \"none\", endpoint._response_types.keys())))\n104- claims.setdefault(\"response_modes_supported\", [\"query\"])\n105-\n106- if \"token\" not in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n107- self._grant_types.append(\"implicit\")\n108-\n109- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_types_supported\", is_required=False, is_list=True)\n110- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"response_modes_supported\", is_list=False)\n111- if \"code\" in claims[\"response_types_supported\"]:\n112- code_grant = endpoint._response_types[\"code\"]\n113- if not isinstance(code_grant, grant_types.AuthorizationCodeGrant) and hasattr(code_grant, \"default_grant\"):\n114- code_grant = code_grant.default_grant\n115-\n116- claims.setdefault(\"code_challenge_methods_supported\",\n117- list(code_grant._code_challenge_methods.keys()))\n118- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"code_challenge_methods_supported\", is_list=False)\n119- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"authorization_endpoint\", is_required=False, is_url=True)\n120-\n121: def validate_metadata_revocation(self, claims, endpoint):\n122- claims.setdefault(\"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n123- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n124-\n125- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n126- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n127- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"revocation_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n128-\n129: def validate_metadata_introspection(self, claims, endpoint):\n130- claims.setdefault(\"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\",\n131- [\"client_secret_post\", \"client_secret_basic\"])\n132-\n133- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_methods_supported\", is_list=True)\n134- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint_auth_signing_alg_values_supported\", is_list=True)\n135- self.validate_metadata(claims, \"introspection_endpoint\", is_required=True, is_url=True)\n136-\n137: def validate_metadata_server(self):\n138- \"\"\"\n139- Authorization servers can have metadata describing their\n140- configuration. The following authorization server metadata values\n141- are used by this specification. More details can be found in\n142- `RFC8414 section 2`_ :\n143-\n144- issuer\n145- REQUIRED\n146-\n147- authorization_endpoint\n148- URL of the authorization server's authorization endpoint\n149- [`RFC6749#Authorization`_]. This is REQUIRED unless no grant types are supported\n150- that use the authorization endpoint.\n151-\n152- token_endpoint\n153- URL of the authorization server's token endpoint [`RFC6749#Token`_]. This\n154- is REQUIRED unless only the implicit grant type is supported.\n155-\n156- scopes_supported\n157- RECOMMENDED.\n158-\n159- response_types_supported\n160- REQUIRED.\n161-\n162- Other OPTIONAL fields:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I notice that my changes didn't take effect correctly. The lines still show the original (buggy) logic rather than the fixed logic. It seems my sed commands didn't work as expected. Let me check what happened and fix it properly.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the current state of the specific lines and apply the fixes again more carefully.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '67p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '67p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not is_required:\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The first fix didn't take. Let me check all the lines that need to be fixed and apply the corrections again.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll reapply all the fixes to the validation logic using more specific sed commands.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '67s/not is_required/is_required/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '67s/not is_required/is_required/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me continue fixing the other inverted logic issues.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the HTTPS URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '71s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '71s/if utils.is_secure_transport/if not utils.is_secure_transport/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/met\nadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Continuing to fix the remaining inverted logic issues.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '77s/if array/key/.startswith(\\\"http\\\"):/if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '77s/if array/key/.startswith(\"http\"):/if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):/' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/end\npoints/metadata.py\nsed: -e expression #1, char 18: unknown option to `s'\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The sed command had an issue with the forward slashes. Let me fix it using a different delimiter.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll use a different delimiter for the sed command to fix the URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '77s|if array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\")|if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\")|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '77s|if array[key].startswith(\"http\")|if not array[key].startswith(\"http\")|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpo\nints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the URL validation logic. Now I need to fix the array validation logic.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the array validation logic by correcting the isinstance check.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '81s|if isinstance(array[key], list)|if not isinstance(array[key], list)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '81s|if isinstance(array[key], list)|if not isinstance(array[key], list)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoin\nts/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Fixed the array validation logic. Now I need to fix the array element validation logic.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the array element validation logic by correcting the isinstance check for elements.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '84s|if isinstance(elem, str)|if not isinstance(elem, str)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '84s|if isinstance(elem, str)|if not isinstance(elem, str)|' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I've attempted to fix all the inverted logic issues. Let's verify that the changes were applied correctly.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the specific lines that should now have the corrected logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '67,68p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '67,68p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if is_required:\n raise ValueError(\"key {} is a mandatory metadata.\".format(key))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The first fix is correct. Let me check the HTTPS URL validation fix.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the HTTPS URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '71,72p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '71,72p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not utils.is_secure_transport(array[key]):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an HTTPS URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The HTTPS URL validation fix is correct. Let me check the URL validation fix.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the URL validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77,78p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77,78p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an URL\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The URL validation fix didn't take effect properly. Let me check what happened.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the exact content of line 77 and fix it again.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The URL validation fix didn't work correctly. Let me try again with a more specific command.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the URL validation logic again using a more precise sed command.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '77c\\\\ if not array[key].startswith(\\\"http\\\"):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '77c\\ if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me verify that the URL validation fix is now correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check line 77 again to confirm the fix.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '77p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if not array[key].startswith(\"http\"):\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The URL validation fix is now correct. Let me check the array validation fix.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check the array validation logic.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81,82p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -n '81,82p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n if isinstance(array[key], list):\n raise ValueError(\"key {}: {} must be an Array\".format(key, array[key]))\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The array validation fix didn't take effect properly either. Let me fix it.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll fix the array validation logic using the change command.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -i '81c\\\\ if not isinstance(array[key], list):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "New Terminal Output:\n\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed# sed -i '81c\\ if not isinstance(array[key], list):' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\n(testbed) root@3f26b35b1c61:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0759b0e203c30d07006970349ff84c8190980477916d474470", "created_at": 1768961184.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0759b0e203c30d0700697034a2986c8190b400a1d71338d6be", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The array validation line should now be correct. Let's check that the fix is in place.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll review line 81 to confirm the fix.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}, {"id": "msg_0759b0e203c30d0700697034a4babc81909813984e251d8870", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The last sed command should have correctly updated the array validation logic to check 'if not isinstance(array[key], list):', which enforces validation for lists as required.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll now check the array element validation (strings in list) to make sure it validates elements as strings (inverted logic fix for elements).\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '84p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 16575, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 220, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 16795}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961190, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "expected_answer": "{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me verify that the array validation fix is now correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check line 81 again to confirm the fix.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"analysis\": \"Let me verify that the array validation fix is now correct.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll check line 81 again to confirm the fix.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '81p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"analysis\": \"The last sed command should have correctly updated the array validation logic to check 'if not isinstance(array[key], list):', which enforces validation for lists as required.\",\n \"plan\": \"I'll now check the array element validation (strings in list) to make sure it validates elements as strings (inverted logic fix for elements).\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"sed -n '84p' /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/metadata.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ]\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_02569b8891d5b51f00697034a7180481949fbae54e9528a9a5", "created_at": 1768961191.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_02569b8891d5b51f00697034a780448194af33b104142f4142", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n- The GOLD command prints line 81 of the specified file to confirm if the array validation fix on that line is correct.\n- The CANDIDATE command prints line 84 instead, which is not the same line as specified in the GOLD. Even though both commands have the same intent (checking code for correctness), they are examining different lines.\n- The validation logic could be on line 81 (according to GOLD), but the CANDIDATE checks line 84, making the actions not functionally equivalent.\n- The plan and analysis for CANDIDATE imply checking array element validation, possibly referring to a different or later change, but the direct command is not the same as the GOLD's intended check.\n- \"is_task_complete\" signal does not exist explicitly, but the formats here are consistent and not contradictory\u2014still, the core divergence is in the line numbers checked.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1304, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 191, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1495}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961197, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}]} -{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nGrant dispatcher assignments swapped causing wrong handler selection\n\n#### Description\n\nThe OpenID Connect grant dispatchers are incorrectly assigning the default_grant and oidc_grant parameters, causing the wrong grant handlers to be selected based on request scopes.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.openid.connect.core.grant_types.dispatchers import ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types import ImplicitGrant as OAuth2ImplicitGrant\nfrom oauthlib.openid.connect.core.grant_types import ImplicitGrant\n\n# Create dispatcher with OAuth2 as default and OpenID as oidc grant\ndispatcher = ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher(\n default_grant=OAuth2ImplicitGrant(),\n oidc_grant=ImplicitGrant()\n)\n\n# Mock request with OAuth2 scopes (should use default_grant)\nclass MockRequest:\n def __init__(self, scopes):\n self.scopes = scopes\n\nrequest = MockRequest(('hello', 'world'))\nhandler = dispatcher._handler_for_request(request)\n\n# This should return OAuth2ImplicitGrant but returns ImplicitGrant instead\nprint(f\"Handler type: {type(handler)}\")\nprint(f\"Expected: OAuth2ImplicitGrant, Got: {type(handler).__name__}\")\n\n# Test with OpenID scopes\nrequest_openid = MockRequest(('hello', 'openid'))\nhandler_openid = dispatcher._handler_for_request(request_openid)\n\n# This should return ImplicitGrant but returns OAuth2ImplicitGrant instead \nprint(f\"OpenID Handler type: {type(handler_openid)}\")\nprint(f\"Expected: ImplicitGrant, Got: {type(handler_openid).__name__}\")\n```\n\nThe same issue affects AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher where the request_validator is also being set to None instead of the provided validator.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container. I need to investigate and fix the OpenID Connect grant dispatchers issue where assignments are swapped causing wrong handler selection. First, I'll check the current directory structure to locate the relevant code.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll use the find command to locate the OAuthLib source code in the container, which should help me identify where the dispatcher classes are defined.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find / -type f -name \\\"*.py\\\" -path \\\"*/oauthlib/*\\\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E \\\"(dispatcher|grant)\\\" | head -20\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed# find / -type f -name \"*.py\" -path \"*/oauthlib/*\" 2>/dev/null | grep -E \"(dispatcher|grant)\" | head -20; tmux wait -S done\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/hybrid.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/__init__.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/base.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/authorization_code.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/implicit.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/refresh_token.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/authorization_code.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/implicit.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/refresh_token.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/client_credentials.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/resource_owner_password_credentials.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/base.py\n/testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/grant_types/__init__.py\n(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I've found the relevant OAuthLib source files, and the dispatcher file is located at /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py. This is exactly where I need to look to fix the issue with swapped grant assignments. I'll examine this file first.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll use the cat command to view the contents of the dispatchers.py file to understand the current implementation and identify the bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "\n def validate_authorization_request(self, request):\n \"\"\"Read scope and route to the designated handler.\"\"\"\n return self._handler_for_request(request).validate_authorization_request(request)\n\n\nclass AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher(Dispatcher):\n \"\"\"\n This is an adapter class that will route simple Token requests, those that authorization_code have a scope\n including 'openid' to either the default_grant or the oidc_grant based on the scopes requested.\n \"\"\"\n def __init__(self, request_validator, default_grant=None, oidc_grant=None):\n self.oidc_grant = default_grant\n self.default_grant = oidc_grant\n self.request_validator = None\n\n def _handler_for_request(self, request):\n handler = self.default_grant\n scopes = ()\n parameters = dict(request.decoded_body)\n client_id = parameters.get('client_id')\n code = parameters.get('code')\n redirect_uri = parameters.get('redirect_uri')\n\n # If code is not present fallback to `default_grant` which will\n # raise an error for the missing `code` in `create_token_response` step.\n if code:\n scopes = self.request_validator.get_authorization_code_scopes(client_id, code, redirect_uri, request)\n\n if 'openid' in scopes:\n handler = self.oidc_grant\n\n log.debug('Selecting handler for request %r.', handler)\n return handler\n\n def create_token_response(self, request, token_handler):\n \"\"\"Read scope and route to the designated handler.\"\"\"\n handler = self._handler_for_request(request)\n return handler.create_token_response(request, token_handler)\n(testbed) root@d498dd0e3f02:/testbed#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_04211888a6494b69006970349fe05c81958f4a85d541898fd8", "created_at": 1768961183.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_04211888a6494b6900697034a04a388195a8cbb05bff9c2daa", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The relevant section of dispatchers.py is visible. In AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher's __init__, the assignments are clearly swapped: self.oidc_grant = default_grant and self.default_grant = oidc_grant. The request_validator is also incorrectly set to None rather than the passed-in validator. This matches the described bug.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll open the file in vim at the location of AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher and fix the assignments for self.default_grant, self.oidc_grant, and self.request_validator. I will use vim for precise edits.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"vim /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 0\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 2214, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 188, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 2402}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961187, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see the bug in the AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher class. Looking at the code, there are two clear issues:\\n1. In the __init__ method, the assignments are swapped: self.oidc_grant = default_grant and self.default_grant = oidc_grant\\n2. The request_validator is being set to None instead of the provided validator\\n\\nI also need to check the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher to see if it has similar issues.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll continue examining the file to see the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -A 20 \\\"class ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see the bug in the AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher class. Looking at the code, there are two clear issues:\\n1. In the __init__ method, the assignments are swapped: self.oidc_grant = default_grant and self.default_grant = oidc_grant\\n2. The request_validator is being set to None instead of the provided validator\\n\\nI also need to check the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher to see if it has similar issues.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll continue examining the file to see the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -A 20 \\\"class ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The relevant section of dispatchers.py is visible. In AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher's __init__, the assignments are clearly swapped: self.oidc_grant = default_grant and self.default_grant = oidc_grant. The request_validator is also incorrectly set to None rather than the passed-in validator. This matches the described bug.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll open the file in vim at the location of AuthorizationTokenGrantDispatcher and fix the assignments for self.default_grant, self.oidc_grant, and self.request_validator. I will use vim for precise edits.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"vim /testbed/oauthlib/openid/connect/core/grant_types/dispatchers.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 0\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_06e492d29d7f0a7a00697034a374988195bd51ddc1831067bb", "created_at": 1768961187.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_06e492d29d7f0a7a00697034a3bd48819588c1f22ee028177b", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "The GOLD command uses `grep -A 20 \"class ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\"` to output the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher class implementation and the 20 lines after its declaration, for code inspection. The candidate, instead, opens the same file in vim, but without specifying any search, navigation, or context around the ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher class\u2014it's just an open at the top of the file.\n\nThe functional difference is:\n- GOLD: Immediately shows the relevant section of code in the terminal for inspection with one command, targeting context around \"ImplicitTokenGrantDispatcher\".\n- CANDIDATE: Opens vim on the file, but does not move to any particular class or context, nor does it guarantee that the relevant section will be immediately visible.\n\nBecause the candidate\u2019s action does not directly surface or print the relevant lines for examination\u2014instead, it requires manual navigation after opening the file\u2014it is not equivalent in result or workflow to the GOLD command. Furthermore, the GOLD approach is non-interactive (shows the code directly in terminal output), while the candidate opens a text editor (interactive), which can block workflow automation and is not the same action.\n\nTherefore, they are not functionally equivalent.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1476, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 251, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1727}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961198, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}]} -{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nUserInfo endpoint returns wrong HTTP status code and raises incorrect exception\n\n#### Description\n\nThe UserInfo endpoint is returning HTTP status code 201 instead of 200 for successful responses, and raising `InvalidClientError` instead of `ServerError` when the \"sub\" claim is missing from user claims.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.openid.connect.core.endpoints.userinfo import UserInfoEndpoint\nfrom oauthlib.common import Request\n\n# Mock validator that returns claims without 'sub'\nclass MockValidator:\n def validate_bearer_token(self, token, scopes, request):\n request.scopes = ['openid']\n return True\n\n def get_userinfo_claims(self, request):\n return {'name': 'John Doe', 'email': 'john@example.com'} # Missing 'sub'\n\nvalidator = MockValidator()\nendpoint = UserInfoEndpoint(validator)\n\n# Create a request\nrequest = Request('http://example.com/userinfo')\nrequest.access_token = 'valid_token'\n\ntry:\n headers, body, status = endpoint.create_userinfo_response('http://example.com/userinfo')\n print(f\"Status code: {status}\") # Should be 200, but returns 201\nexcept Exception as e:\n print(f\"Exception: {type(e).__name__}\") # Should be ServerError, but raises InvalidClientError\n```\n\nAlso, when userinfo claims are returned as a JWT string, the endpoint incorrectly returns status 201 instead of 200.\n\nThe endpoint should return HTTP status 200 for successful userinfo responses and raise `ServerError` when required claims are missing, as per OpenID Connect specification.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@e1db3683e3c1:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm in a terminal session with a Python virtual environment activated (testbed). I need to investigate an issue with the OAuthlib UserInfo endpoint. First, I should check if oauthlib is installed and locate the relevant files.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed and examine its version to understand the context of the issue.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip list | grep oauthlib\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@e1db3683e3c1:/testbed# pip list | grep oauthlib; tmux wait -S done\noauthlib 3.2.2 /testbed\n(testbed) root@e1db3683e3c1:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0523b0fcb2bf782d006970349fe0c48197a630adde0dc56de9", "created_at": 1768961183.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0523b0fcb2bf782d00697034a048bc8197bf73da5e41f081cc", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"Oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed in the /testbed directory. The next step is to locate the userinfo endpoint code to patch its behavior for the HTTP status and exception handling.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll locate the source file for the UserInfoEndpoint so I can inspect and prepare to edit it.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -type f -name 'userinfo*'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1379, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 133, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1512}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961188, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see that oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed from the local testbed directory. Now I need to locate the UserInfo endpoint implementation to examine and fix the issues mentioned in the task.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll find the UserInfo endpoint file in the oauthlib package to examine its implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -name \\\"userinfo.py\\\" -type f\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see that oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed from the local testbed directory. Now I need to locate the UserInfo endpoint implementation to examine and fix the issues mentioned in the task.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll find the UserInfo endpoint file in the oauthlib package to examine its implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -name \\\"userinfo.py\\\" -type f\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"Oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed in the /testbed directory. The next step is to locate the userinfo endpoint code to patch its behavior for the HTTP status and exception handling.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll locate the source file for the UserInfoEndpoint so I can inspect and prepare to edit it.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -type f -name 'userinfo*'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0108510047deaa6300697034a447a8819397f0667ce04d619c", "created_at": 1768961188.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0108510047deaa6300697034a4b8808193a0e1a401a8f3f7a2", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "The GOLD command searches for files named exactly \"userinfo.py\" (case-sensitive, precise match), while the CANDIDATE command searches for all files starting with \"userinfo\" regardless of their extension (e.g., \"userinfo.py\", \"userinfo_test.py\", \"userinfo_utils.py\", etc.). The CANDIDATE command may yield extra matches beyond the file intended for the UserInfo endpoint main implementation, though it will include the main target if present. The functional intent (\"locate the userinfo endpoint implementation file\") is still met, since the main file will appear in the results either way, just with the possibility of additional files. Both commands are searching within the same directory tree for files relevant to \"userinfo\". Their explanations and state analyses are also aligned, and both have the same value for \"is_task_complete\".\n\nTherefore, the commands are functionally equivalent because the core outcome (ability to locate the key UserInfo implementation file) is achieved in both cases, even if the candidate command is a bit broader in its search.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1354, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 215, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1569}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961199, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A=B]]"}, {"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"Oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed in the /testbed directory. The next step is to locate the userinfo endpoint code to patch its behavior for the HTTP status and exception handling.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll locate the source file for the UserInfoEndpoint so I can inspect and prepare to edit it.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -type f -name 'userinfo*'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see that oauthlib version 3.2.2 is installed from the local testbed directory. Now I need to locate the UserInfo endpoint implementation to examine and fix the issues mentioned in the task.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll find the UserInfo endpoint file in the oauthlib package to examine its implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find /testbed -name \\\"userinfo.py\\\" -type f\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0a5157d6ac6a189a00697034afd3e08196a190720b64d5ad58", "created_at": 1768961199.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0a5157d6ac6a189a00697034b016088196a1115f1774178da7", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n- The GOLD command searches for all files under /testbed (recursive) with names starting with 'userinfo' (using wildcard: 'userinfo*'), regardless of extension, type, or position in the filename. This could match 'userinfo', 'userinfo.py', 'userinfo_module.py', or 'userinfo_endpoint.txt', etc.\n- The CANDIDATE command specifically searches for files named exactly 'userinfo.py' under /testbed, recursively, of type file.\n- This means the candidate's command is more limited and could miss relevant files that are named 'userinfo_endpoint.py', 'userinfo_utils.py', or similar, which would be found by the GOLD command.\n\nThe candidate's command is not functionally equivalent because it does not account for all possible relevant filenames that the GOLD command would match.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1354, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 172, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1526}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961204, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}]} -{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nMissing `_get_updated_schema` method breaks schema migration\n\n#### Description\n\nThe `_get_updated_schema` static method was removed from the Permissions class, but it's still being called during schema updates. This causes an AttributeError when trying to migrate old permission configurations.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom redbot.cogs.permissions.permissions import Permissions\n\n# This would typically happen during bot startup with old config data\nold_config = {\n \"0\": {\n \"owner_models\": {\n \"cogs\": {\n \"Admin\": {\n \"allow\": [78631113035100160],\n \"deny\": [96733288462286848]\n }\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"ping\": {\n \"allow\": [96733288462286848],\n \"default\": \"allow\"\n }\n }\n }\n }\n}\n\n# This will fail with AttributeError\nPermissions._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n```\n\nThe error occurs because the method that handles converting old permission schema formats to the new format is no longer available, breaking backwards compatibility for users upgrading from older versions.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container, in a virtual environment called 'testbed'. I need to locate and fix the missing '_get_updated_schema' method in the Permissions class.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, I'll check the current directory structure to locate the redbot project files, particularly the permissions module mentioned in the error.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find . -name \\\"redbot\\\" -type d\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed# find . -name \"redbot\" -type d; tmux wait -S done\n./redbot\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I found a directory named 'redbot' in the current path. Now I need to explore this directory to locate the permissions module mentioned in the error.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll navigate to the redbot directory and look for the cogs/permissions structure mentioned in the error.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cd redbot && find . -path \\\"*/cogs/permissions*\\\" -type f\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/en-US.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/he-IL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/id-ID.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/es-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-TW.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ko-KR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/uk-UA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-CN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hu-HU.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sl-SI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/el-GR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/lol-US.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sr-CS.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nb-NO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/tr-TR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ca-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-HK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bg-BG.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sv-SE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sk-SK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/vi-VN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ja-JP.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/da-DK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ro-RO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I've found the permissions module at './cogs/permissions/permissions.py'. This is where the Permissions class is defined and where the missing _get_updated_schema method should be located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll examine the permissions.py file to understand the current implementation and confirm that the _get_updated_schema method is indeed missing.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \\\"_get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/id-ID.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/es-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-TW.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ko-KR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/uk-UA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-CN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hu-HU.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sl-SI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/el-GR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/lol-US.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sr-CS.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nb-NO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/tr-TR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ca-ES.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/zh-HK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bg-BG.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sv-SE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/sk-SK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/vi-VN.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ja-JP.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/da-DK.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ro-RO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"_get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n707: new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The grep command found a reference to _get_updated_schema on line 707, but didn't find the method definition itself. This confirms the method is missing but still being called. Let's check more context around this line to understand how it should work.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll examine the lines around 707 in the permissions.py file to understand how _get_updated_schema is being used.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | sed -n '700,720p'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/ro-RO.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"_get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n707: new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | sed -n '700,720p'; tmux wait -S done\n\n async def _maybe_update_schema(self) -> None:\n \"\"\"Maybe update rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0.\"\"\"\n if await self.config.version():\n return\n old_config = await self.config.all_guilds()\n old_config[GLOBAL] = await self.config.all()\n new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n await self.config.custom(COG).set(new_cog_rules)\n await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n await self.config.version.set(__version__)\n\n async def _load_all_rules(self):\n \"\"\"Load all of this cog's rules into loaded commands and cogs.\"\"\"\n for category, getter in ((COG, self.bot.get_cog), (COMMAND, self.bot.get_command)):\n all_rules = await self.config.custom(category).all()\n for name, rules in all_rules.items():\n obj = getter(name)\n if obj is None:\n continue\n self._load_rules_for(obj, rules)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see that _get_updated_schema is being called in the _maybe_update_schema method, which is responsible for updating rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0. The method is being called on self (an instance of the Permissions class), but it should be a static method according to the error description.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's search for any definition of _get_updated_schema in the entire file to make sure it's not defined somewhere else.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \\\"def _get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "./cogs/permissions/locales/af-ZA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/en-PT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/ar-SA.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/hr-HR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/it-IT.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/fi-FI.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/de-DE.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/nl-NL.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/pt-BR.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/cs-CZ.po\n./cogs/permissions/locales/bs-BA.po\n./cogs/permissions/converters.py\n./cogs/permissions/__init__.py\n./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"_get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n707: new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | sed -n '700,720p'; tmux wait -S done\n\n async def _maybe_update_schema(self) -> None:\n \"\"\"Maybe update rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0.\"\"\"\n if await self.config.version():\n return\n old_config = await self.config.all_guilds()\n old_config[GLOBAL] = await self.config.all()\n new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n await self.config.custom(COG).set(new_cog_rules)\n await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n await self.config.version.set(__version__)\n\n async def _load_all_rules(self):\n \"\"\"Load all of this cog's rules into loaded commands and cogs.\"\"\"\n for category, getter in ((COG, self.bot.get_cog), (COMMAND, self.bot.get_command)):\n all_rules = await self.config.custom(category).all()\n for name, rules in all_rules.items():\n obj = getter(name)\n if obj is None:\n continue\n self._load_rules_for(obj, rules)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"def _get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The search for 'def _get_updated_schema' returned no results, confirming that the method is indeed missing from the file. Now I need to understand what this method should do by examining the context where it's being used.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check the git history to see if I can find when this method was removed and what it used to do.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git log --oneline -p -- ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 20 -B 5 \\\"_get_updated_schema\\\" | head -30\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": " all_rules = await self.config.custom(category).all()\n for name, rules in all_rules.items():\n obj = getter(name)\n if obj is None:\n continue\n self._load_rules_for(obj, rules)\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# cat ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -n \"def _get_updated_schema\"; tmux wait -S done\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot# git log --oneline -p -- ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 20 -B 5 \"_get_updated_schema\" | head -30; tmux\nwait -S done\n@@ -749,56 +709,6 @@ class Permissions(commands.Cog):\n await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n await self.config.version.set(__version__)\n\n- @staticmethod\n- def _get_updated_schema(\n- old_config: _OldConfigSchema,\n- ) -> Tuple[_NewConfigSchema, _NewConfigSchema]:\n- # Prior to 1.0.0, the schema was in this form for both global\n- # and guild-based rules:\n- # \"owner_models\"\n- # -> \"cogs\"\n- # -> Cog names...\n- # -> \"allow\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"deny\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"default\"\n- # -> \"allow\"|\"deny\"\n- # -> \"commands\"\n- # -> Command names...\n- # -> \"allow\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"deny\"\n- # -> [Model IDs...]\n- # -> \"default\"\n--\n+ \"\"\"Maybe update rules set by config prior to permissions 1.0.0.\"\"\"\n+ if await self.config.version():\n+ return\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}, {"content": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see from the git log output that the _get_updated_schema method was indeed removed. It was a static method that converted old config schema to the new schema format. I need to restore this method in the Permissions class.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Let's get more of the git diff to see the complete implementation of the _get_updated_schema method that was removed.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git log --oneline -p -- ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 50 \\\"@staticmethod\\\" | grep -A 50 \\\"_get_updated_schema\\\" | head -60\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "assistant", "type": "message"}, {"content": "-\n- new_cog_rules = {}\n- new_cmd_rules = {}\n- for guild_id, old_rules in old_config.items():\n- if \"owner_models\" not in old_rules:\n- continue\n- old_rules = old_rules[\"owner_models\"]\n- for category, new_rules in zip((\"cogs\", \"commands\"), (new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules)):\n- if category in old_rules:\n- for name, rules in old_rules[category].items():\n- these_rules = new_rules.setdefault(name, {})\n- guild_rules = these_rules.setdefault(str(guild_id), {})\n- # Since allow rules would take precedence if the same model ID\n- # sat in both the allow and deny list, we add the deny entries\n- # first and let any conflicting allow entries overwrite.\n- for model_id in rules.get(\"deny\", []):\n- guild_rules[str(model_id)] = False\n- for model_id in rules.get(\"allow\", []):\n- guild_rules[str(model_id)] = True\n- if \"default\" in rules:\n- default = rules[\"default\"]\n- if default == \"allow\":\n- guild_rules[\"default\"] = True\n- elif default == \"deny\":\n- guild_rules[\"default\"] = False\n- return new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules\n-\n async def _load_all_rules(self):\n--\n--\n+ new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules = self._get_updated_schema(old_config)\n+ await self.config.custom(COG).set(new_cog_rules)\n+ await self.config.custom(COMMAND).set(new_cmd_rules)\n--\n+ @staticmethod\n+ def _get_updated_schema(\n+ old_config: _OldConfigSchema,\n+ ) -> Tuple[_NewConfigSchema, _NewConfigSchema]:\ngrep: write error: Broken pipe\n(testbed) root@2392ce82286c:/testbed/redbot#\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0cf4097c3351422100697034a00c60819089a50e2eba05c12f", "created_at": 1768961184.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0cf4097c3351422100697034a0e3a48190b1802181c76f6242", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The full body of the removed static method _get_updated_schema is visible. It processes 'old_config' and produces new cog and command rule structures compatible with the new schema. The logic is now clear for re-adding it.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will open permissions.py in a terminal text editor (vim), add the recovered _get_updated_schema method back to the Permissions class, and then save and exit. This will restore backwards compatibility for migration.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"vim ./cogs/permissions/permissions.py\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 60\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}, {"id": "msg_0cf4097c3351422100697034a4ca048190bc9ce0c2cc00f434", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"Ready to restore the _get_updated_schema method to permissions.py, and vim editor has not yet been opened.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Send the Vim keystrokes to jump to just before _load_all_rules and paste the function implementation exactly as recovered from git.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"/async def _load_all_rules\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"O\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"@staticmethod\\n def _get_updated_schema(\\n old_config: '_OldConfigSchema',\\n ) -> tuple:\\n # Prior to 1.0.0, the schema was in this form for both global\\n # and guild-based rules:\\n # \\\"owner_models\\\"\\n # -> \\\"cogs\\\"\\n # -> Cog names...\\n # -> \\\"allow\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"deny\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"default\\\"\\n # -> \\\"allow\\\"|\\\"deny\\\"\\n # -> \\\"commands\\\"\\n # -> Command names...\\n # -> \\\"allow\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"deny\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"default\\\"\\n new_cog_rules = {}\\n new_cmd_rules = {}\\n for guild_id, old_rules in old_config.items():\\n if \\\"owner_models\\\" not in old_rules:\\n continue\\n old_rules = old_rules[\\\"owner_models\\\"]\\n for category, new_rules in zip((\\\"cogs\\\", \\\"commands\\\"), (new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules)):\\n if category in old_rules:\\n for name, rules in old_rules[category].items():\\n these_rules = new_rules.setdefault(name, {})\\n guild_rules = these_rules.setdefault(str(guild_id), {})\\n # Since allow rules would take precedence if the same model ID\\n # sat in both the allow and deny list, we add the deny entries\\n # first and let any conflicting allow entries overwrite.\\n for model_id in rules.get(\\\"deny\\\", []):\\n guild_rules[str(model_id)] = False\\n for model_id in rules.get(\\\"allow\\\", []):\\n guild_rules[str(model_id)] = True\\n if \\\"default\\\" in rules:\\n default = rules[\\\"default\\\"]\\n if default == \\\"allow\\\":\\n guild_rules[\\\"default\\\"] = True\\n elif default == \\\"deny\\\":\\n guild_rules[\\\"default\\\"] = False\\n return new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules\\n\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 4\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"\\x1b:wq\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 5156, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 849, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 6005}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961200, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see part of the implementation but it got cut off. Let's try a different approach to get the complete method implementation.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check the full commit that removed this method to get the complete implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git show HEAD~10:./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 50 \\\"def _get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I can see part of the implementation but it got cut off. Let's try a different approach to get the complete method implementation.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check the full commit that removed this method to get the complete implementation.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"git show HEAD~10:./cogs/permissions/permissions.py | grep -A 50 \\\"def _get_updated_schema\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"Ready to restore the _get_updated_schema method to permissions.py, and vim editor has not yet been opened.\",\n \"explanation\": \"Send the Vim keystrokes to jump to just before _load_all_rules and paste the function implementation exactly as recovered from git.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"/async def _load_all_rules\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"O\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"@staticmethod\\n def _get_updated_schema(\\n old_config: '_OldConfigSchema',\\n ) -> tuple:\\n # Prior to 1.0.0, the schema was in this form for both global\\n # and guild-based rules:\\n # \\\"owner_models\\\"\\n # -> \\\"cogs\\\"\\n # -> Cog names...\\n # -> \\\"allow\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"deny\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"default\\\"\\n # -> \\\"allow\\\"|\\\"deny\\\"\\n # -> \\\"commands\\\"\\n # -> Command names...\\n # -> \\\"allow\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"deny\\\"\\n # -> [Model IDs...]\\n # -> \\\"default\\\"\\n new_cog_rules = {}\\n new_cmd_rules = {}\\n for guild_id, old_rules in old_config.items():\\n if \\\"owner_models\\\" not in old_rules:\\n continue\\n old_rules = old_rules[\\\"owner_models\\\"]\\n for category, new_rules in zip((\\\"cogs\\\", \\\"commands\\\"), (new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules)):\\n if category in old_rules:\\n for name, rules in old_rules[category].items():\\n these_rules = new_rules.setdefault(name, {})\\n guild_rules = these_rules.setdefault(str(guild_id), {})\\n # Since allow rules would take precedence if the same model ID\\n # sat in both the allow and deny list, we add the deny entries\\n # first and let any conflicting allow entries overwrite.\\n for model_id in rules.get(\\\"deny\\\", []):\\n guild_rules[str(model_id)] = False\\n for model_id in rules.get(\\\"allow\\\", []):\\n guild_rules[str(model_id)] = True\\n if \\\"default\\\" in rules:\\n default = rules[\\\"default\\\"]\\n if default == \\\"allow\\\":\\n guild_rules[\\\"default\\\"] = True\\n elif default == \\\"deny\\\":\\n guild_rules[\\\"default\\\"] = False\\n return new_cog_rules, new_cmd_rules\\n\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 4\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"\\x1b:wq\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": false,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_056834d1a57df95100697034b0f81c81939025e87aa979ae97", "created_at": 1768961201.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_056834d1a57df95100697034b1499c8193837515ba6b94192b", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n\n- The GOLD command is attempting to view the implementation of the `_get_updated_schema` method by showing a previous version of the file using `git show` and searching for the function header, likely to copy or review its implementation.\n- The CANDIDATE, instead of using a read/search operation, is performing editing operations: in a (presumed) vim session, it searches for a location in the file, opens a new line, pastes the full method implementation, and writes/quits.\n- These two are not functionally equivalent: one is an inspection command (`git show ... | grep ...`), the other is a sequence of (editor) restore/insert operations.\n- The GOLD is not altering the state of the codebase, while the CANDIDATE is directly modifying the file.\n- The intention/stage in the workflow is very different. One is to \"get the implementation\", the other is to \"paste the implementation\" (restore).\n- \"is_task_complete\" is false for both, but the means, order of actions, and impact are not the same.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1909, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 234, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 2143}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1768961206, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}]} +{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nWebApplicationServer initialization broken after recent changes\n\n#### Description\n\nThe WebApplicationServer class is not working properly - it seems like the constructor parameters got mixed up and some endpoints are being initialized with wrong arguments.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n\nclass MyRequestValidator(RequestValidator):\n def validate_client_id(self, client_id, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def validate_redirect_uri(self, client_id, redirect_uri, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def save_authorization_code(self, client_id, code, request, *args, **kwargs):\n pass\n\n def authenticate_client(self, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def validate_code(self, client_id, code, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def confirm_redirect_uri(self, client_id, code, redirect_uri, client, request, *args, **kwargs):\n return True\n\n def save_bearer_token(self, token, request, *args, **kwargs):\n pass\n\nvalidator = MyRequestValidator()\nserver = WebApplicationServer(validator)\n\n# Try to create an authorization response\nauth_uri = 'https://example.com/auth?client_id=test&redirect_uri=https://example.com/callback&response_type=code'\nheaders, body, status = server.create_authorization_response(auth_uri, credentials={'user': 'test'})\n```\n\nThis should work for a basic OAuth2 authorization code flow, but instead it fails with various errors related to incorrect initialization of the server components.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@a8d5de6bbb94:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_035f3b04a5de8c67006971614c39148197989a03d447528841", "created_at": 1769038156.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_035f3b04a5de8c67006971614c82f881978da691ff4a67f0b8", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The terminal is ready with no previous output shown. The problem description suggests that recent changes to oauthlib's WebApplicationServer API are causing constructor argument errors, likely due to a signature change where the first argument might now be 'grant_type_handler' (not 'validator'). We need to verify the current constructor signature of WebApplicationServer in the installed oauthlib version.\",\n \"explanation\": \"We will inspect the current signature of WebApplicationServer in oauthlib to determine how its initialization should be performed. We do this using Python's inspect module and by importing the relevant class.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import inspect; from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer; print(inspect.signature(WebApplicationServer.__init__))\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1183, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 197, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1380}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038161, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "uuid": "40074f5b-e565-4865-bca8-31d121f1fb08-1", "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container. I need to investigate the WebApplicationServer initialization issue with OAuthlib. First, I should check if OAuthlib is installed and what version we're working with.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if OAuthlib is installed and what version we have to understand the environment better.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip list | grep oauth\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "model_output": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The terminal is ready with no previous output shown. The problem description suggests that recent changes to oauthlib's WebApplicationServer API are causing constructor argument errors, likely due to a signature change where the first argument might now be 'grant_type_handler' (not 'validator'). We need to verify the current constructor signature of WebApplicationServer in the installed oauthlib version.\",\n \"explanation\": \"We will inspect the current signature of WebApplicationServer in oauthlib to determine how its initialization should be performed. We do this using Python's inspect module and by importing the relevant class.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import inspect; from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer; print(inspect.signature(WebApplicationServer.__init__))\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "parsed_output": {"state_analysis": "The terminal is ready with no previous output shown. The problem description suggests that recent changes to oauthlib's WebApplicationServer API are causing constructor argument errors, likely due to a signature change where the first argument might now be 'grant_type_handler' (not 'validator'). We need to verify the current constructor signature of WebApplicationServer in the installed oauthlib version.", "explanation": "We will inspect the current signature of WebApplicationServer in oauthlib to determine how its initialization should be performed. We do this using Python's inspect module and by importing the relevant class.", "commands": [{"keystrokes": "python -c \"import inspect; from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer; print(inspect.signature(WebApplicationServer.__init__))\"\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 10}], "is_task_complete": false}, "similarity_score": 0.1794871794871795, "schema_check_passed": true, "task_complete_check_passed": true, "string_similarity_passed": false, "judge_passed": false, "failure_reason": "judge_evaluation_failed", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a Docker container. I need to investigate the WebApplicationServer initialization issue with OAuthlib. First, I should check if OAuthlib is installed and what version we're working with.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if OAuthlib is installed and what version we have to understand the environment better.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip list | grep oauth\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The terminal is ready with no previous output shown. The problem description suggests that recent changes to oauthlib's WebApplicationServer API are causing constructor argument errors, likely due to a signature change where the first argument might now be 'grant_type_handler' (not 'validator'). We need to verify the current constructor signature of WebApplicationServer in the installed oauthlib version.\",\n \"explanation\": \"We will inspect the current signature of WebApplicationServer in oauthlib to determine how its initialization should be performed. We do this using Python's inspect module and by importing the relevant class.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import inspect; from oauthlib.oauth2 import WebApplicationServer; print(inspect.signature(WebApplicationServer.__init__))\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_088dde9ea3b9b5b100697161522308819787c38170a1c47d86", "created_at": 1769038162.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_088dde9ea3b9b5b10069716152710c8197ad195eebd0e99085", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n- The GOLD command checks if OAuthlib is installed and, if so, displays its installed version. This helps the user understand the environment and is a standard diagnostic first step.\n- The CANDIDATE command inspects the function signature of `WebApplicationServer.__init__` using Python's `inspect` module. This verifies how the class should be initialized, based on the current installed version, but does not directly show if OAuthlib is installed or its version.\n- The intended goal in the GOLD (\"check if OAuthlib is installed and what version\") is not met by the CANDIDATE command, as it assumes the package is installed and jumps straight to inspecting a class signature.\n- If OAuthlib was not installed, the CANDIDATE command would error out, while the GOLD provides more foundational environment awareness.\n- Both have `is_task_complete: false`, which matches.\n\nConclusion:\n- The commands are not functionally equivalent because the CANDIDATE does not check for installation nor show the package version, as the GOLD does. It focuses on API inspection, not environment verification.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1409, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 234, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1643}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038165, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}], "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "threshold": null} +{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nVersionInfo equality comparison returns incorrect result\n\n#### Description\n\nThe `VersionInfo.__eq__` method is returning the wrong boolean value when comparing version instances. When two `VersionInfo` objects should be equal, the comparison returns `False`, and when they should be unequal, it returns `True`.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom redbot import VersionInfo\n\n# These should be equal but return False\nv1 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"1.0.0\")\nv2 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"1.0.0\")\nprint(f\"v1 == v2: {v1 == v2}\") # Expected: True, Actual: False\n\n# These should be unequal but return True \nv3 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"1.0.0\")\nv4 = VersionInfo.from_str(\"2.0.0\")\nprint(f\"v3 == v4: {v3 == v4}\") # Expected: False, Actual: True\n```\n\nThis affects any code that relies on version comparison equality, such as checking minimum/maximum bot version requirements in installable packages.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@0bb646c093ce:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0efac65b0c306819006971614c39388193856788f82938da79", "created_at": 1769038156.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0efac65b0c306819006971614c90308193aa9db53b2397c4ca", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The terminal is at a shell prompt in the /testbed directory. No output is currently shown relevant to the VersionInfo class or the redbot package. No prior commands or files are listed.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, locate the source code for VersionInfo to inspect the __eq__ method. This will tell us why its equality comparison is broken. We'll search for the definition and then display its code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find . -iname '*.py' | xargs grep -n 'class VersionInfo'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1064, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 155, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1219}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038160, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "uuid": "613741e5-f1ac-42e3-9775-73a33d6b8808-1", "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to first locate the redbot package and the VersionInfo class to investigate the equality comparison issue.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if the redbot package is installed and where it's located to begin investigating the VersionInfo equality issue.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import redbot; print(redbot.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "model_output": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The terminal is at a shell prompt in the /testbed directory. No output is currently shown relevant to the VersionInfo class or the redbot package. No prior commands or files are listed.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, locate the source code for VersionInfo to inspect the __eq__ method. This will tell us why its equality comparison is broken. We'll search for the definition and then display its code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find . -iname '*.py' | xargs grep -n 'class VersionInfo'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "parsed_output": {"state_analysis": "The terminal is at a shell prompt in the /testbed directory. No output is currently shown relevant to the VersionInfo class or the redbot package. No prior commands or files are listed.", "explanation": "First, locate the source code for VersionInfo to inspect the __eq__ method. This will tell us why its equality comparison is broken. We'll search for the definition and then display its code.", "commands": [{"keystrokes": "find . -iname '*.py' | xargs grep -n 'class VersionInfo'\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 10}], "is_task_complete": false}, "similarity_score": 0.11214953271028037, "schema_check_passed": true, "task_complete_check_passed": true, "string_similarity_passed": false, "judge_passed": false, "failure_reason": "judge_evaluation_failed", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to first locate the redbot package and the VersionInfo class to investigate the equality comparison issue.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if the redbot package is installed and where it's located to begin investigating the VersionInfo equality issue.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import redbot; print(redbot.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The terminal is at a shell prompt in the /testbed directory. No output is currently shown relevant to the VersionInfo class or the redbot package. No prior commands or files are listed.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, locate the source code for VersionInfo to inspect the __eq__ method. This will tell us why its equality comparison is broken. We'll search for the definition and then display its code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"find . -iname '*.py' | xargs grep -n 'class VersionInfo'\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 10\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_08c625943856098300697161509ff88196a3db5774afbc1111", "created_at": 1769038160.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_08c625943856098300697161516a888196893f273941077561", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n- The GOLD output checks for the installation and location of the `redbot` package by importing it in Python and printing its `__file__`. This ensures that the package is present in the environment and allows the investigator to proceed accordingly.\n- The CANDIDATE output directly searches the source tree for the definition of the `VersionInfo` class using `find` and `grep`, without confirming whether the `redbot` package is installed or available in the environment.\n- The intent in the GOLD output is to first confirm the presence and path of the `redbot` package, which could be in a virtualenv, site-packages, or elsewhere, not necessarily under the working directory. The candidate's approach assumes source is present in the local directory tree.\n- The command results are not guaranteed to be the same: GOLD could succeed if the package is installed (source not locally available), while CANDIDATE\u2019s approach could fail (for example, if only the wheel is installed and not the source).\n- The state analysis and explanations focus on slightly different first steps in the investigation; the GOLD output prioritizes environmental setup, while the CANDIDATE presumes the location of sources.\n\nConclusion:\n- These are not functionally equivalent. The commands serve related investigative purposes but use different mechanisms and may yield divergent user states with regards to the investigation.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1372, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 286, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1658}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038165, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}], "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "threshold": null} +{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\nGrant type initialization breaks with None assignments\n\n#### Description\n\nGrant types are not initializing properly due to incorrect None assignments in the constructor. When creating grant type instances, several critical attributes are being set to None instead of their intended values, causing authorization flows to fail.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2 import AuthorizationCodeGrant\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749 import RequestValidator\n\n# Create a basic request validator\nvalidator = RequestValidator()\n\n# Try to create an authorization code grant\ngrant = AuthorizationCodeGrant(request_validator=validator)\n\n# The grant should have proper response_types but they're None\nprint(\"Response types:\", grant.response_types) # Expected: ['code'], Actual: None\nprint(\"Refresh token:\", grant.refresh_token) # Expected: True, Actual: None\nprint(\"Code modifiers:\", grant._code_modifiers) # Expected: [], Actual: None\n```\n\nThe grant types fail to work because essential attributes like `response_types`, `refresh_token`, and `_code_modifiers` are incorrectly set to None during initialization, breaking the OAuth2 authorization flow.\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@18321e95c7c7:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0223e5c1b72aa1f5006971614c3f408197ad96baa99dae8c7e", "created_at": 1769038156.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0223e5c1b72aa1f5006971614cb00881979749b3031ea2470c", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The current terminal is idle in the /testbed directory. The task describes a bug in the OAuthlib code where grant type class attributes are initialized incorrectly (None instead of their intended defaults), causing authorization flow breakage. The provided Python example suggests this occurs in oauthlib.oauth2's AuthorizationCodeGrant class. No code has been inspected yet.\",\n \"explanation\": \"We'll first locate the exact source file of AuthorizationCodeGrant, then inspect its constructor to verify if attributes like response_types, refresh_token, and _code_modifiers are set to None. This will confirm where and how to patch the assignments.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.AuthorizationCodeGrant.__module__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -r 'class AuthorizationCodeGrant' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1063, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 300, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1363}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038161, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "uuid": "3cc79a36-b6e4-4707-a3fa-21bfaaac29c0-1", "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to investigate the OAuthlib issue with grant type initialization. First, I should check if OAuthlib is installed and where it's located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed in the current environment and examine its location.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "model_output": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The current terminal is idle in the /testbed directory. The task describes a bug in the OAuthlib code where grant type class attributes are initialized incorrectly (None instead of their intended defaults), causing authorization flow breakage. The provided Python example suggests this occurs in oauthlib.oauth2's AuthorizationCodeGrant class. No code has been inspected yet.\",\n \"explanation\": \"We'll first locate the exact source file of AuthorizationCodeGrant, then inspect its constructor to verify if attributes like response_types, refresh_token, and _code_modifiers are set to None. This will confirm where and how to patch the assignments.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.AuthorizationCodeGrant.__module__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -r 'class AuthorizationCodeGrant' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "parsed_output": {"state_analysis": "The current terminal is idle in the /testbed directory. The task describes a bug in the OAuthlib code where grant type class attributes are initialized incorrectly (None instead of their intended defaults), causing authorization flow breakage. The provided Python example suggests this occurs in oauthlib.oauth2's AuthorizationCodeGrant class. No code has been inspected yet.", "explanation": "We'll first locate the exact source file of AuthorizationCodeGrant, then inspect its constructor to verify if attributes like response_types, refresh_token, and _code_modifiers are set to None. This will confirm where and how to patch the assignments.", "commands": [{"keystrokes": "python3 -c \"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.AuthorizationCodeGrant.__module__)\"\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 5}, {"keystrokes": "python3 -c \"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.__file__)\"\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 5}, {"keystrokes": "grep -r 'class AuthorizationCodeGrant' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 5}], "is_task_complete": false}, "similarity_score": 0.3564356435643564, "schema_check_passed": true, "task_complete_check_passed": true, "string_similarity_passed": false, "judge_passed": false, "failure_reason": "judge_evaluation_failed", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to investigate the OAuthlib issue with grant type initialization. First, I should check if OAuthlib is installed and where it's located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed in the current environment and examine its location.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The current terminal is idle in the /testbed directory. The task describes a bug in the OAuthlib code where grant type class attributes are initialized incorrectly (None instead of their intended defaults), causing authorization flow breakage. The provided Python example suggests this occurs in oauthlib.oauth2's AuthorizationCodeGrant class. No code has been inspected yet.\",\n \"explanation\": \"We'll first locate the exact source file of AuthorizationCodeGrant, then inspect its constructor to verify if attributes like response_types, refresh_token, and _code_modifiers are set to None. This will confirm where and how to patch the assignments.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.AuthorizationCodeGrant.__module__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth2; print(oauthlib.oauth2.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -r 'class AuthorizationCodeGrant' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_001f6e6df6fe49bb00697161523dd481979d8fa882b584f68e", "created_at": 1769038162.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_001f6e6df6fe49bb006971615294188197806bce9fda70b9fa", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "The GOLD output issues a single Python command to check if oauthlib is installed and prints its location. This efficiently determines both the presence of oauthlib and its installation path.\n\nThe CANDIDATE output, however, issues three commands:\n1. Prints the module where AuthorizationCodeGrant is defined.\n2. Prints the location of the oauthlib.oauth2 directory/file.\n3. Searches for the definition of the AuthorizationCodeGrant class in the source code.\n\nWhile the CANDIDATE includes the functionality of the GOLD (finding the path to oauthlib via the second command), it adds two additional steps: checking the module name of AuthorizationCodeGrant and then a grep to find the class definition. These extra steps go beyond the explicit scope of the GOLD action, which was specifically just to check for installation and location, not to analyze class definition sources.\n\nBoth are meant for confirmation/discovery regarding oauthlib, but the commands in the CANDIDATE go further than locating oauthlib; they start hunting for a specific class and its file in the source, which is out of scope compared to the very targeted GOLD inspection.\n\nAdditionally, the CANDIDATE uses `python3` explicitly, while the GOLD uses `python`\u2014this is a minor detail unless the default Python version doesn't matter in the context, but it's not critical for equivalence due to CLI environments usually aliasing `python`/`python3`.\n\nMost importantly, the CANDIDATE performs additional, functionally distinct actions, not just an equivalent check. Therefore, these outputs are **not functionally equivalent**.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1519, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 327, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1846}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038167, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}], "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "threshold": null} +{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task instruction and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFor each response:\n1. Analyze the current state based on any terminal output provided\n2. Determine the next set of commands needed to make progress\n3. Decide if you need to see the output of these commands before proceeding\n\nInstruction:\n# [Bug]: PKCE code challenge verification is broken in AuthorizationCodeGrant\n\n## Bug summary\n\nThe PKCE (Proof Key for Code Exchange) code challenge verification in the `AuthorizationCodeGrant` class is broken. The `code_challenge_method_s256` function is incorrectly implemented, causing verification to fail even with valid code verifiers.\n\n## Code for reproduction\n\n```python\nimport hashlib\nimport base64\nfrom oauthlib.oauth2.rfc6749.grant_types.authorization_code import code_challenge_method_s256\n\n# Create a valid code verifier and challenge\nverifier = \"test_code_verifier_example_string_12345\"\nchallenge = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(\n hashlib.sha256(verifier.encode()).digest()\n).decode().rstrip('=')\n\nprint(f\"Verifier: {verifier}\")\nprint(f\"Challenge: {challenge}\")\n\n# This should return True for a valid verifier/challenge pair\nresult = code_challenge_method_s256(verifier, challenge)\nprint(f\"Verification result: {result}\")\n```\n\n## Actual outcome\n\n```\nVerifier: test_code_verifier_example_string_12345\nChallenge: E9Melhoa2OwvFrEMTJguCHaoeK1t8URWbuGJSstw-cM\nVerification result: False\n```\n\nThe verification fails even though the verifier and challenge are correctly generated according to the PKCE specification.\n\n## Expected outcome\n\n```\nVerifier: test_code_verifier_example_string_12345\nChallenge: E9Melhoa2OwvFrEMTJguCHaoeK1t8URWbuGJSstw-cM\nVerification result: True\n```\n\nThe verification should succeed when the challenge is correctly derived from the verifier.\n\n## Additional information\n\nThis issue affects all OAuth2 flows that use PKCE, including the authorization code grant type. The problem is in the implementation of the `code_challenge_method_s256` function, which is not correctly comparing the challenge and verifier.\n\n## Operating system\n\nAll platforms\n\n## Python version\n\n3.6+\n\n\nYour response must be a JSON object that matches this schema:\n\n{\n \"$defs\": {\n \"Command\": {\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"keystrokes\": {\n \"description\": \"Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will be interpreted literally.\",\n \"title\": \"Keystrokes\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"is_blocking\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your command.DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, wait instead of blocking.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Blocking\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n },\n \"timeout_sec\": {\n \"description\": \"The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.\",\n \"title\": \"Timeout Sec\",\n \"type\": \"number\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"keystrokes\",\n \"is_blocking\",\n \"timeout_sec\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"Command\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n }\n },\n \"additionalProperties\": false,\n \"properties\": {\n \"state_analysis\": {\n \"description\": \"Description of the current state of the terminal\",\n \"title\": \"State Analysis\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"explanation\": {\n \"description\": \"Brief explanation of what these commands will do\",\n \"title\": \"Explanation\",\n \"type\": \"string\"\n },\n \"commands\": {\n \"description\": \"List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container\",\n \"items\": {\n \"$ref\": \"#/$defs/Command\"\n },\n \"title\": \"Commands\",\n \"type\": \"array\"\n },\n \"is_task_complete\": {\n \"description\": \"Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before saying you're done.\",\n \"title\": \"Is Task Complete\",\n \"type\": \"boolean\"\n }\n },\n \"required\": [\n \"state_analysis\",\n \"explanation\",\n \"commands\",\n \"is_task_complete\"\n ],\n \"title\": \"CommandBatchResponse\",\n \"type\": \"object\"\n}\n\nDon't include markdown formatting.\n\nNote that you operate directly on the terminal from inside a tmux session. Use tmux keystrokes like `C-x` or `Escape` to interactively navigate the terminal. If you would like to execute a command that you have written you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command.\n\nFor example, if you write \"ls -la\" you will need to append a newline character to the end of your command like this: `ls -la\\n`.\n\nOne thing to be very careful about is handling interactive sessions like less, vim, or git diff. In these cases, you should not wait for the output of the command. Instead, you should send the keystrokes to the terminal as if you were typing them.\n\nThe current terminal state is:\n(testbed) root@94c8c77efd28:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_01c02a401b729f75006971614c64488190934e8decfbd21db8", "created_at": 1769038156.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_01c02a401b729f75006971614ca034819092c973978e07b645", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"We are in a shell prompt inside a Docker container at /testbed. There is no evidence yet of code for oauthlib, nor any test or reproduction script present.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, we need to locate the installed location of the oauthlib package so we can inspect and possibly patch the code of the AuthorizationCodeGrant class, specifically the implementation of the code_challenge_method_s256 function. We'll list the installed package location and grep to find the function.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -r 'def code_challenge_method_s256' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1314, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 206, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1520}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038162, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "uuid": "21183f9c-700f-44cc-9c91-05d993ccfa83-1", "expected_answer": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to investigate the PKCE code challenge verification issue in the OAuthLib library. First, I should check if the oauthlib package is installed and where it's located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed and find its location to examine the problematic code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "model_output": "{\n \"state_analysis\": \"We are in a shell prompt inside a Docker container at /testbed. There is no evidence yet of code for oauthlib, nor any test or reproduction script present.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, we need to locate the installed location of the oauthlib package so we can inspect and possibly patch the code of the AuthorizationCodeGrant class, specifically the implementation of the code_challenge_method_s256 function. We'll list the installed package location and grep to find the function.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -r 'def code_challenge_method_s256' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "parsed_output": {"state_analysis": "We are in a shell prompt inside a Docker container at /testbed. There is no evidence yet of code for oauthlib, nor any test or reproduction script present.", "explanation": "First, we need to locate the installed location of the oauthlib package so we can inspect and possibly patch the code of the AuthorizationCodeGrant class, specifically the implementation of the code_challenge_method_s256 function. We'll list the installed package location and grep to find the function.", "commands": [{"keystrokes": "pip show oauthlib\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 5}, {"keystrokes": "grep -r 'def code_challenge_method_s256' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\n", "is_blocking": true, "timeout_sec": 5}], "is_task_complete": false}, "similarity_score": 0.3125, "schema_check_passed": true, "task_complete_check_passed": true, "string_similarity_passed": false, "judge_passed": false, "failure_reason": "judge_evaluation_failed", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I'm at the root prompt in a tmux session. I need to investigate the PKCE code challenge verification issue in the OAuthLib library. First, I should check if the oauthlib package is installed and where it's located.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I'll check if oauthlib is installed and find its location to examine the problematic code.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python -c \\\"import oauthlib; print(oauthlib.__file__)\\\"\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 2\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"We are in a shell prompt inside a Docker container at /testbed. There is no evidence yet of code for oauthlib, nor any test or reproduction script present.\",\n \"explanation\": \"First, we need to locate the installed location of the oauthlib package so we can inspect and possibly patch the code of the AuthorizationCodeGrant class, specifically the implementation of the code_challenge_method_s256 function. We'll list the installed package location and grep to find the function.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -r 'def code_challenge_method_s256' /usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0d32a7d1c9eacf4d00697161525d1481909168c7368c268212", "created_at": 1769038162.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0d32a7d1c9eacf4d0069716152a7b8819094f01cff8ffc0ed8", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n\n- The GOLD command uses Python to import the oauthlib package and prints its file path. This both checks if oauthlib is importable and directly locates its main __init__.py file (or similar).\n- The CANDIDATE uses `pip show oauthlib` to list package metadata including the location. This lists the installation path in a different way but is functionally sufficient to locate the package.\n- The CANDIDATE also then immediately `grep`s for a particular method (`code_challenge_method_s256`) in the oauthlib directory\u2014presuming it to be under `/usr/local/lib/python*/site-packages/oauthlib/`. This step is additional and goes beyond the GOLD, attempting to inspect code implementation right away without first confirming the location from system output.\n- Both command sets do confirm whether oauthlib is installed and try to locate the code, but the CANDIDATE's commands combine two actions\u2014the second of which is not present in GOLD. GOLD's method is more portable and direct for discovering which oauthlib is currently being imported, and only focuses on location at this step.\n- If the first CANDIDATE command (`pip show oauthlib`) fails (e.g., due to a non-standard environment or multiple installations), the second command may be searching in the wrong place.\n- The intent and sequence are not equivalent. The GOLD only establishes location via Python import (guaranteed to be the import path of the current Python interpreter's environment), whereas the CANDIDATE queries `pip` (which might not match the Python interpreter in use) and jumps ahead to content grepping without a location check/confirmation step.\n\nConclusion: The candidate output is not functionally equivalent, as it both uses a less reliable method to locate the package and performs an extra action not present in GOLD.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1432, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 380, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1812}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038168, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}], "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_1"}, "threshold": null} +{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "You are an AI assistant tasked with solving command-line tasks in a Linux environment. You will be given a task description and the output from previously executed commands. Your goal is to solve the task by providing batches of shell commands.\n\nFormat your response as JSON with the following structure:\n\n{\n \"analysis\": \"Analyze the current state based on the terminal output provided. What do you see? What has been accomplished? What still needs to be done?\",\n \"plan\": \"Describe your plan for the next steps. What commands will you run and why? Be specific about what you expect each command to accomplish.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cd project\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": true\n}\n\nRequired fields:\n- \"analysis\": Your analysis of the current situation\n- \"plan\": Your plan for the next steps\n- \"commands\": Array of command objects to execute\n\nOptional fields:\n- \"task_complete\": Boolean indicating if the task is complete (defaults to false if not present)\n\nCommand object structure:\n- \"keystrokes\": String containing the exact keystrokes to send to the terminal (required)\n- \"duration\": Number of seconds to wait for the command to complete before the next command will be executed (defaults to 1.0 if not present)\n\nIMPORTANT: The text inside \"keystrokes\" will be used completely verbatim as keystrokes. Write commands exactly as you want them sent to the terminal:\n- Most bash commands should end with a newline (\\n) to cause them to execute\n- For special key sequences, use tmux-style escape sequences:\n - C-c for Ctrl+C\n - C-d for Ctrl+D\n\nThe \"duration\" attribute specifies the number of seconds to wait for the command to complete (default: 1.0) before the next command will be executed. On immediate tasks (e.g., cd, ls, echo, cat) set a duration of 0.1 seconds. On commands (e.g., gcc, find, rustc) set a duration of 1.0 seconds. On slow commands (e.g., make, python3 [long running script], wget [file]) set an appropriate duration as you determine necessary.\n\nIt is better to set a smaller duration than a longer duration. It is always possible to wait again if the prior output has not finished, by running {\"keystrokes\": \"\", \"duration\": 10.0} on subsequent requests to wait longer. Never wait longer than 60 seconds; prefer to poll to see intermediate result status.\n\nImportant notes:\n- Each command's keystrokes are sent exactly as written to the terminal\n- Do not include extra whitespace before or after the keystrokes unless it's part of the intended command\n- Extra text before or after the JSON will generate warnings but be tolerated\n- The JSON must be valid - use proper escaping for quotes and special characters within strings\n- Commands array can be empty if you want to wait without taking action\n\nTask Description:\nOAuth1 Client constructor swaps nonce and timestamp parameters\n\nWhen creating an OAuth1 Client with explicit nonce and timestamp values, the parameters get swapped internally. The nonce value is assigned to timestamp and vice versa.\n\n#### Steps/Code to Reproduce\n\n```python\nfrom oauthlib.oauth1 import Client\n\n# Create client with explicit nonce and timestamp\nclient = Client('client-key', nonce='my_nonce', timestamp='my_timestamp')\n\n# Check the values - they should match what we passed in\nprint(f\"Expected nonce: my_nonce, Got: {client.nonce}\")\nprint(f\"Expected timestamp: my_timestamp, Got: {client.timestamp}\")\n```\n\nExpected output:\n```\nExpected nonce: my_nonce, Got: my_nonce\nExpected timestamp: my_timestamp, Got: my_timestamp\n```\n\nActual output:\n```\nExpected nonce: my_nonce, Got: my_timestamp\nExpected timestamp: my_timestamp, Got: my_nonce\n```\n\nThis also affects OAuth signature generation since the wrong values are used for nonce and timestamp in the signature base string.\n\n\nCurrent terminal state:\nCurrent Terminal Screen:\n(testbed) root@b8ffb6895dc4:/testbed#\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0dac59b3aff89582006971614c58408193aab47a849ec178b8", "created_at": 1769038156.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0dac59b3aff89582006971614caf008193a09f946bc00dc4d1", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The terminal is at an interactive shell inside the /testbed directory of a container or VM. There is currently no information about the contents of the directory, the installed packages, or any custom code here. No investigation of the actual oauthlib source code or attempt to reproduce the issue has occurred yet. The issue described concerns the oauthlib package, specifically the assignment of 'nonce' and 'timestamp' in the Client constructor.\",\n \"plan\": \"First, check that the oauthlib package is installed. Then, create a Python test script that reproduces the issue as described. Run the script to confirm the bug's presence. Once confirmed, locate the installed oauthlib package source code and investigate the Client constructor to find where the parameters may be swapped. This will guide the next steps for fixing the bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > test_oauth1_swap.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": null, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 896, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0}, "output_tokens": 265, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1161}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038161, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "reward": 0.0, "uuid": "f2271e25-1984-4609-8890-42ecc8026684-1", "expected_answer": "{\n \"analysis\": \"I'm at a root prompt in a testbed environment. I need to investigate the OAuth1 client nonce/timestamp swapping issue. First, I'll need to check if the oauthlib package is installed and then create a Python script to reproduce the issue.\",\n \"plan\": \"1. Check if oauthlib is installed by trying to import it in Python\\n2. If not installed, install it using pip\\n3. Create a Python script that reproduces the issue\\n4. Run the script to confirm the bug\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth1; print('oauthlib is installed')\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}", "model_output": "{\n \"analysis\": \"The terminal is at an interactive shell inside the /testbed directory of a container or VM. There is currently no information about the contents of the directory, the installed packages, or any custom code here. No investigation of the actual oauthlib source code or attempt to reproduce the issue has occurred yet. The issue described concerns the oauthlib package, specifically the assignment of 'nonce' and 'timestamp' in the Client constructor.\",\n \"plan\": \"First, check that the oauthlib package is installed. Then, create a Python test script that reproduces the issue as described. Run the script to confirm the bug's presence. Once confirmed, locate the installed oauthlib package source code and investigate the Client constructor to find where the parameters may be swapped. This will guide the next steps for fixing the bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > test_oauth1_swap.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}", "parsed_output": {"analysis": "The terminal is at an interactive shell inside the /testbed directory of a container or VM. There is currently no information about the contents of the directory, the installed packages, or any custom code here. No investigation of the actual oauthlib source code or attempt to reproduce the issue has occurred yet. The issue described concerns the oauthlib package, specifically the assignment of 'nonce' and 'timestamp' in the Client constructor.", "plan": "First, check that the oauthlib package is installed. Then, create a Python test script that reproduces the issue as described. Run the script to confirm the bug's presence. Once confirmed, locate the installed oauthlib package source code and investigate the Client constructor to find where the parameters may be swapped. This will guide the next steps for fixing the bug.", "commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls -la\n", "duration": 0.1}, {"keystrokes": "pip show oauthlib\n", "duration": 0.1}, {"keystrokes": "cat > test_oauth1_swap.py\n", "duration": 0.1}], "task_complete": false}, "similarity_score": 0.33613445378151263, "schema_check_passed": true, "task_complete_check_passed": true, "string_similarity_passed": false, "judge_passed": false, "failure_reason": "judge_evaluation_failed", "judge_evaluations": [{"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"analysis\": \"I'm at a root prompt in a testbed environment. I need to investigate the OAuth1 client nonce/timestamp swapping issue. First, I'll need to check if the oauthlib package is installed and then create a Python script to reproduce the issue.\",\n \"plan\": \"1. Check if oauthlib is installed by trying to import it in Python\\n2. If not installed, install it using pip\\n3. Create a Python script that reproduces the issue\\n4. Run the script to confirm the bug\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth1; print('oauthlib is installed')\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"analysis\": \"The terminal is at an interactive shell inside the /testbed directory of a container or VM. There is currently no information about the contents of the directory, the installed packages, or any custom code here. No investigation of the actual oauthlib source code or attempt to reproduce the issue has occurred yet. The issue described concerns the oauthlib package, specifically the assignment of 'nonce' and 'timestamp' in the Client constructor.\",\n \"plan\": \"First, check that the oauthlib package is installed. Then, create a Python test script that reproduces the issue as described. Run the script to confirm the bug's presence. Once confirmed, locate the installed oauthlib package source code and investigate the Client constructor to find where the parameters may be swapped. This will guide the next steps for fixing the bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > test_oauth1_swap.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_01bd2580e6b57ef80069716152749881978d38d7e040f282ff", "created_at": 1769038162.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_01bd2580e6b57ef80069716152cdb08197aad1dc0aae19b16d", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n\n- The GOLD output runs a Python one-liner to directly check if `oauthlib.oauth1` can be imported, verifying that `oauthlib` is installed. This is a direct and sufficient check for step 1 and partially for step 2 in its plan.\n- The CANDIDATE output runs three commands:\n 1. `ls -la`: Lists directory contents. This does not directly contribute to checking if `oauthlib` is installed.\n 2. `pip show oauthlib`: Checks if `oauthlib` is installed via pip metadata, which is an alternate way to verify package installation, functionally equivalent in result to the GOLD (although it does not confirm importability).\n 3. `cat > test_oauth1_swap.py`: Prepares to create a test script. This matches step 3 in the plan and slightly goes further ahead than the GOLD.\n\nFunctional Equivalence:\n- The CANDIDATE checks for the existence of `oauthlib` using `pip show oauthlib` instead of a direct import, but the intent\u2014to confirm installation\u2014is the same.\n- The GOLD uses Python itself, which may catch both installation and importability issues (e.g., broken install), while `pip show` only cares about installation metadata, not importability or Python path issues. But in most typical contexts, both accomplish the check.\n- The extra `ls -la` in the CANDIDATE is harmless; it simply lists the directory and does not interfere with the primary intent.\n- The creation of the test script stub is a step further, but does not contradict or skip critical sequence elements.\n\n`task_complete` is `false` in both cases.\n\nConclusion:\nAlthough there are extra steps in the CANDIDATE (directory listing, pre-creation of a test script), the intent of the GOLD (to check for installed `oauthlib`) is achieved by `pip show oauthlib`, and overall the state regarding investigation and setup is materially equivalent. In a setup/prep situation, these differences are not functionally significant for this investigation.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1520, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 431, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1951}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038169, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A=B]]"}, {"responses_create_params": {"background": null, "include": null, "input": [{"content": "System role =====\nYou are a meticulous software engineering and terminal command grader.\n\nTask: Determine if the candidate's generated output keystroke(s) is functionally equivalent to the GOLD output keystroke(s). You can use the state analysis and explanation to help with your decision.\nIf the \"is_task_complete\" for candidate and gold are different, mark as not equivalent.\n\nShow your reason why they are equivalent or not equivalent first and then provide the output.\n\nOutput (at the end after double newlines):\n- If equivalent: [[A=B]] they are equivalent\n- If not equivalent: [[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Example 1 (equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created a Python script to reproduce the issue. The next step is to run it and verify that it raises the expected `NameError`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will execute the script to observe the error triggered when calling `create_authorization_response`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 3\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"I have created `reproduce_issue.py`, which is expected to trigger a `NameError` in oauthlib. The script has not been executed yet to confirm the failure or capture the stack trace.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will run the script to reproduce the `NameError` so I can inspect the stack trace and identify where and why the bug occurs.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python reproduce_issue.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate's command is functionally equivalent to the GOLD command. The difference in timeout does not change the result or intent of the action in this context.\n\n[[A=B]] they are equivalent\n\n===== Example 2 (not equivalent) =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments are correctly set to `ImplicitGrant` in both the `Server` class (line 133) and `MobileApplicationServer` class (line 43). The next step is to verify the `password_grant` assignments.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will use `grep` to confirm that `password_grant` is correctly set to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant.*ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"state_analysis\": \"The `implicit_grant` assignments now correctly use `ImplicitGrant` in both relevant server classes, matching the intended fix. To ensure overall correctness, additional related assignments and mappings should be verified, including `password_grant`, `BearerToken`, `response_types`, `grant_types`, and `default_response_type`.\",\n \"explanation\": \"I will search for key variables in the file to confirm that all targeted changes were applied correctly and that no related configuration issues remain.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"password_grant\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"BearerToken(\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"default_response_type\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"response_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"grep -n \\\\\"grant_types\\\\\" /testbed/oauthlib/oauth2/rfc6749/endpoints/pre_configured.py\\\\n\",\n \"is_blocking\": true,\n \"timeout_sec\": 5\n }\n ],\n \"is_task_complete\": false\n}\n\nThe candidate command is not functionally equivalent because it broadly searches for `password_grant` without enforcing that it is assigned to `ResourceOwnerPasswordCredentialsGrant`, whereas the GOLD command explicitly verifies the correct assignment in a single, precise check.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent\n\n===== Inputs =====\nGOLD:\n{\n \"analysis\": \"The terminal is at an interactive shell inside the /testbed directory of a container or VM. There is currently no information about the contents of the directory, the installed packages, or any custom code here. No investigation of the actual oauthlib source code or attempt to reproduce the issue has occurred yet. The issue described concerns the oauthlib package, specifically the assignment of 'nonce' and 'timestamp' in the Client constructor.\",\n \"plan\": \"First, check that the oauthlib package is installed. Then, create a Python test script that reproduces the issue as described. Run the script to confirm the bug's presence. Once confirmed, locate the installed oauthlib package source code and investigate the Client constructor to find where the parameters may be swapped. This will guide the next steps for fixing the bug.\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"ls -la\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"pip show oauthlib\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n },\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"cat > test_oauth1_swap.py\\n\",\n \"duration\": 0.1\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}\n\nCANDIDATE:\n{\n \"analysis\": \"I'm at a root prompt in a testbed environment. I need to investigate the OAuth1 client nonce/timestamp swapping issue. First, I'll need to check if the oauthlib package is installed and then create a Python script to reproduce the issue.\",\n \"plan\": \"1. Check if oauthlib is installed by trying to import it in Python\\n2. If not installed, install it using pip\\n3. Create a Python script that reproduces the issue\\n4. Run the script to confirm the bug\",\n \"commands\": [\n {\n \"keystrokes\": \"python3 -c \\\"import oauthlib.oauth1; print('oauthlib is installed')\\\"\\n\",\n \"duration\": 1.0\n }\n ],\n \"task_complete\": false\n}", "role": "user", "type": "message"}], "instructions": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "metadata": null, "model": null, "parallel_tool_calls": true, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "reasoning": null, "service_tier": null, "store": null, "temperature": null, "text": null, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_logprobs": null, "top_p": null, "truncation": null, "user": null, "stream": null}, "response": {"id": "resp_0a2362e23d7429420069716159a5c08197a38e712dd9411be3", "created_at": 1769038169.0, "error": null, "incomplete_details": null, "instructions": null, "metadata": {}, "model": "gpt-4.1-2025-04-14", "object": "response", "output": [{"id": "msg_0a2362e23d7429420069716159edf881978def42af8e167037", "content": [{"annotations": [], "text": "Reasoning:\n\n- The GOLD output checks for the file listing (`ls -la`), verifies the presence of oauthlib with package details (using `pip show oauthlib`), and then begins to create a test script (`cat > test_oauth1_swap.py`).\n- The CANDIDATE output jumps straight to checking if the `oauthlib.oauth1` module is importable in Python with a one-liner command, essentially verifying that the package is installed.\n- While both approaches check for the presence of the `oauthlib` package, CANDIDATE omits file listing and gathering package metadata, and does not begin script creation. Thus, it only covers a subset of the GOLD actions.\n- Importantly, the absence of the subsequent steps (starting script creation, gathering package version/details) and checking only for import instead of leveraging `pip show` means the CANDIDATE's action is not functionally equivalent to the more thorough GOLD steps.\n- Both have `\"task_complete\": false`, so this aspect matches, but the differences in investigative scope and subsequent action setup are significant.\n\n[[A!=B]] they are not equivalent", "type": "output_text", "logprobs": []}], "role": "assistant", "status": "completed", "type": "message"}], "parallel_tool_calls": true, "temperature": 1.0, "tool_choice": "auto", "tools": [], "top_p": 1.0, "background": false, "conversation": null, "max_output_tokens": 512, "max_tool_calls": null, "previous_response_id": null, "prompt": null, "prompt_cache_key": null, "reasoning": {"effort": null, "generate_summary": null, "summary": null}, "safety_identifier": null, "service_tier": "default", "status": "completed", "text": {"format": {"type": "text"}, "verbosity": "medium"}, "top_logprobs": 0, "truncation": "disabled", "usage": {"input_tokens": 1520, "input_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 1024}, "output_tokens": 232, "output_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 0}, "total_tokens": 1752}, "user": null, "billing": {"payer": "developer"}, "completed_at": 1769038173, "frequency_penalty": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 0.0, "prompt_cache_retention": null, "store": true}, "verdict_label": "[[A!=B]]"}], "metadata": {"category": "first_round", "harness": "terminus_2"}, "threshold": null} diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/requirements.txt b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/requirements.txt index 00ed83213..75e60c851 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/requirements.txt +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/requirements.txt @@ -1 +1,2 @@ -e nemo-gym[dev] @ ../../ +openapi-schema-validator==0.6.3 diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/schemas.py b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/schemas.py new file mode 100644 index 000000000..31527cc7f --- /dev/null +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/schemas.py @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ +# SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright (c) 2025 NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights reserved. +# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. +TERMINUS_1_SCHEMA = { + "title": "CommandBatchResponse", + "type": "object", + "additionalProperties": False, + "definitions": { + "Command": { + "title": "Command", + "type": "object", + "additionalProperties": False, + "properties": { + "keystrokes": { + "title": "Keystrokes", + "description": ( + "Keystrokes to execute in the terminal. Use tmux-style escape " + "sequences for modifier keys (e.g. C-c for ctrl-c). Modifier keys " + "must be sent as their own commands otherwise the characters will " + "be interpreted literally." + ), + "type": "string", + }, + "is_blocking": { + "title": "Is Blocking", + "description": ( + "Whether to wait for and return the terminal output after executing " + "these keystrokes. This will append '; tmux wait -S done' to your " + "command. DO NOT block on modifier keys or inside interactive " + "programs (e.g. vim or less). Only block when the command is " + "executed in the command line, is not interactive, and you expect " + "the output to be returned with no intervention. When in doubt, " + "wait instead of blocking." + ), + "type": "boolean", + }, + "timeout_sec": { + "title": "Timeout Sec", + "description": "The number of expected seconds to wait for the command to complete.", + "type": "number", + }, + }, + "required": ["keystrokes", "is_blocking", "timeout_sec"], + } + }, + "properties": { + "state_analysis": { + "title": "State Analysis", + "description": "Description of the current state of the terminal", + "type": "string", + }, + "explanation": { + "title": "Explanation", + "description": "Brief explanation of what these commands will do", + "type": "string", + }, + "commands": { + "title": "Commands", + "description": "List of shell interactions to execute in the Docker container", + "type": "array", + "items": { + "$ref": "#/definitions/Command", + }, + }, + "is_task_complete": { + "title": "Is Task Complete", + "description": ( + "Whether the task is complete following the execution of these commands. " + "Make sure to check that the command you last executed worked before " + "saying you're done." + ), + "type": "boolean", + }, + }, + "required": ["state_analysis", "explanation", "commands", "is_task_complete"], +} + +TERMINUS_2_SCHEMA = { + "title": "CommandBatchResponse", + "type": "object", + "additionalProperties": False, + "definitions": { + "Command": { + "title": "Command", + "type": "object", + "additionalProperties": False, + "properties": { + "keystrokes": { + "title": "Keystrokes", + "description": ( + "String containing the exact keystrokes to send to the terminal. " + "Most bash commands should end with a newline (\\n) to cause them " + "to execute. For special key sequences, use tmux-style escape " + "sequences (e.g. C-c for Ctrl+C, C-d for Ctrl+D)." + ), + "type": "string", + }, + "duration": { + "title": "Duration", + "description": ( + "Number of seconds to wait for the command to complete before the " + "next command will be executed. Defaults to 1.0 if not present. " + "On immediate tasks (e.g., cd, ls, echo, cat) set 0.1 seconds. " + "On commands (e.g., gcc, find, rustc) set 1.0 seconds. On slow " + "commands (e.g., make, python3 [long running script], wget [file]) " + "set an appropriate duration. Never wait longer than 60 seconds; " + "prefer to poll to see intermediate result status." + ), + "type": "number", + "default": 1.0, + }, + }, + "required": ["keystrokes"], + } + }, + "properties": { + "analysis": { + "title": "Analysis", + "description": ( + "Analyze the current state based on the terminal output provided. " + "What do you see? What has been accomplished? What still needs to be done?" + ), + "type": "string", + }, + "plan": { + "title": "Plan", + "description": ( + "Describe your plan for the next steps. What commands will you run " + "and why? Be specific about what you expect each command to accomplish." + ), + "type": "string", + }, + "commands": { + "title": "Commands", + "description": "Array of command objects to execute in the terminal", + "type": "array", + "items": { + "$ref": "#/definitions/Command", + }, + }, + "task_complete": { + "title": "Task Complete", + "description": ("Boolean indicating if the task is complete. Defaults to false if not present."), + "type": "boolean", + "default": False, + }, + }, + "required": ["analysis", "plan", "commands"], +} diff --git a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/tests/test_app.py b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/tests/test_app.py index cd6b60b19..b3ef31fb9 100644 --- a/resources_servers/terminus_judge/tests/test_app.py +++ b/resources_servers/terminus_judge/tests/test_app.py @@ -12,292 +12,574 @@ # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. -from copy import deepcopy -from typing import Any -from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock +import json +from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch -from pytest import approx, fixture +import pytest +from pytest import fixture -from nemo_gym.config_types import ModelServerRef from nemo_gym.openai_utils import ( + NeMoGymEasyInputMessage, NeMoGymResponse, NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming, - NeMoGymResponseOutputItem, NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage, NeMoGymResponseOutputText, + NeMoGymResponseReasoningItem, + NeMoGymSummary, ) from nemo_gym.server_utils import ServerClient from resources_servers.terminus_judge.app import ( + FailureCode, TerminusJudgeResourcesServer, TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig, TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest, + _extract_last_assistant_text, + check_task_complete, + command_similarity, + extract_keystrokes, + text_similarity, ) -class TestApp: - @fixture - def config(self) -> TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig: - cfg = TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig( - host="0.0.0.0", - port=8080, - entrypoint="", - judge_model_server=ModelServerRef(type="responses_api_models", name="judge"), - judge_responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[]), - judge_prompt_template_fpath="prompt_templates/terminus_prompt.txt", - ) - cfg.judge_equal_label = "[[A=B]]" - cfg.judge_not_equal_label = "[[A!=B]]" - return cfg - - def _create_response(self, id: str, output_item: NeMoGymResponseOutputItem) -> dict[str, Any]: - return NeMoGymResponse( - id=id, - created_at=123.0, - model="judge_model", +def create_terminus_1_response(commands: list, is_task_complete: bool = False) -> dict: + """Create a valid terminus_1 schema response.""" + return { + "state_analysis": "Analyzing the current state", + "explanation": "Explanation of the commands", + "commands": [ + { + "keystrokes": cmd["keystrokes"], + "is_blocking": cmd.get("is_blocking", True), + "timeout_sec": cmd.get("timeout_sec", 5.0), + } + for cmd in commands + ], + "is_task_complete": is_task_complete, + } + + +def create_terminus_2_response(commands: list, task_complete: bool = False) -> dict: + """Create a valid terminus_2 schema response.""" + return { + "analysis": "Analyzing the current state", + "plan": "Plan for the next steps", + "commands": [ + { + "keystrokes": cmd["keystrokes"], + "duration": cmd.get("duration", 1.0), + } + for cmd in commands + ], + "task_complete": task_complete, + } + + +class TestExtractKeystrokes: + """Tests for the extract_keystrokes helper function.""" + + def test_extract_single_keystroke(self): + """Test extracting keystrokes from a single command.""" + data = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]} + result = extract_keystrokes(data) + assert result == ["ls -la"] + + def test_extract_multiple_keystrokes(self): + """Test extracting keystrokes from multiple commands.""" + data = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "cd /home"}, {"keystrokes": "ls"}]} + result = extract_keystrokes(data) + assert result == ["cd /home", "ls"] + + def test_extract_empty_commands(self): + """Test extracting from empty commands list.""" + data = {"commands": []} + result = extract_keystrokes(data) + assert result == [] + + def test_extract_missing_keystrokes(self): + """Test extracting when some commands lack keystrokes.""" + data = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls"}, {"other": "field"}]} + result = extract_keystrokes(data) + assert result == ["ls"] + + +class TestTextSimilarity: + """Tests for the text_similarity function.""" + + def test_identical_strings(self): + """Test similarity of identical strings.""" + assert text_similarity("hello", "hello") == 1.0 + + def test_completely_different_strings(self): + """Test similarity of completely different strings.""" + result = text_similarity("abc", "xyz") + assert 0.0 <= result < 0.5 + + def test_similar_strings(self): + """Test similarity of similar strings.""" + result = text_similarity("hello world", "hello world!") + assert 0.9 < result < 1.0 + + def test_empty_strings(self): + """Test similarity of empty strings.""" + assert text_similarity("", "") == 1.0 + + +class TestCommandSimilarity: + """Tests for the command_similarity function.""" + + def test_identical_commands(self): + """Test similarity of identical commands.""" + gt = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]} + pred = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]} + assert command_similarity(gt, pred) == 1.0 + + def test_different_commands(self): + """Test similarity of different commands.""" + gt = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls"}]} + pred = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "pwd"}]} + result = command_similarity(gt, pred) + assert result < 0.5 + + def test_both_empty(self): + """Test similarity when both have empty commands.""" + gt = {"commands": []} + pred = {"commands": []} + assert command_similarity(gt, pred) == 1.0 + + def test_one_empty(self): + """Test similarity when one is empty.""" + gt = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls"}]} + pred = {"commands": []} + assert command_similarity(gt, pred) == 0.0 + + def test_multiple_commands_concatenation(self): + """Test concatenation of multiple commands.""" + gt = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "cd /home"}, {"keystrokes": "ls"}]} + pred = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "cd /home"}, {"keystrokes": "ls"}]} + assert command_similarity(gt, pred) == 1.0 + + def test_command_order_matters(self): + """Test that command order affects similarity.""" + gt = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls"}, {"keystrokes": "pwd"}]} + pred = {"commands": [{"keystrokes": "pwd"}, {"keystrokes": "ls"}]} + result = command_similarity(gt, pred) + assert result < 1.0 + + +class TestCheckTaskComplete: + """Tests for the check_task_complete function.""" + + def test_task_complete_true_when_both_true(self): + """Test when both pred and expected have task_complete=True.""" + pred = {"task_complete": True} + expected = {"task_complete": True} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is True + + def test_task_complete_false_when_pred_missing(self): + """Test when pred is missing task_complete but expected has it.""" + pred = {} + expected = {"task_complete": True} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is False + + def test_task_complete_false_when_pred_false(self): + """Test when pred has task_complete=False but expected has True.""" + pred = {"task_complete": False} + expected = {"task_complete": True} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is False + + def test_is_task_complete_true_when_both_true(self): + """Test when both pred and expected have is_task_complete=True.""" + pred = {"is_task_complete": True} + expected = {"is_task_complete": True} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is True + + def test_is_task_complete_false_when_pred_missing(self): + """Test when pred is missing is_task_complete but expected has it.""" + pred = {} + expected = {"is_task_complete": True} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is False + + def test_task_complete_true_when_expected_false(self): + """Test passes when expected task_complete is False.""" + pred = {} + expected = {"task_complete": False} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is True + + def test_task_complete_true_when_not_in_expected(self): + """Test passes when task_complete is not in expected answer.""" + pred = {} + expected = {} + assert check_task_complete(pred, expected) is True + + +class TestExtractLastAssistantText: + """Tests for the _extract_last_assistant_text helper function.""" + + def _create_verify_request_with_output(self, output_items: list) -> TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest: + """Helper to create a TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest with specified output items.""" + response = NeMoGymResponse( + id="test_response", + created_at=1000, + model="test_model", object="response", - output=[output_item], + output=output_items, parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", + tool_choice="auto", tools=[], - ).model_dump() - - def _msg(self, text: str) -> NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage: - return NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage( - id="msg_id", - content=[NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text=text, type="output_text")], - role="assistant", - status="completed", - type="message", ) - - async def test_verify_equal_simple(self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig) -> None: - """Test basic equal verdict without swap check.""" - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=config, server_client=server_mock) - - post_mock = MagicMock() - # Use return_value instead of side_effect for single response - post_mock.json = AsyncMock( - return_value=self._create_response("first", self._msg("some text [[A=B]] trailing")) + return TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( + responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming( + input=[NeMoGymEasyInputMessage(role="user", content="test")] + ), + response=response, + expected_answer='{"commands": []}', + metadata={"harness": "terminus_1"}, ) - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(return_value=post_mock) - model_create_params = NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[{"role": "user", "content": "Q: 1+1?"}]) - model_response = NeMoGymResponse( - id="resp", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", - object="response", - output=[self._msg("It is 2.")], - parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", - tools=[], + def test_extract_single_assistant_message(self): + """Test extracting text from a single assistant message.""" + output_message = NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage( + id="msg_1", + content=[NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text="Hello response.")], ) - - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=deepcopy(model_create_params), - response=model_response.model_copy(deep=True), - expected_answer="2", + body = self._create_verify_request_with_output([output_message]) + result = _extract_last_assistant_text(body) + assert result == "Hello response." + + def test_extract_multiple_content_parts(self): + """Test extracting text from message with multiple content parts.""" + output_message = NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage( + id="msg_1", + content=[ + NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text="Part 1."), + NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text="Part 2."), + ], ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(1.0) - assert res.expected_answer == "2" - assert len(res.judge_evaluations) == 1 - assert res.judge_evaluations[0].verdict_label == "[[A=B]]" - - async def test_verify_equal_with_swap_check_both_equal(self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig) -> None: - """Test swap check when both evaluations return equal.""" - config_twice = config.model_copy(deep=True) - config_twice.check_twice_swap = True - - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=config_twice, server_client=server_mock) - - # Create two separate response mocks for two separate POST calls - post_mock_1 = MagicMock() - post_mock_1.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("first", self._msg("[[A=B]]"))) - - post_mock_2 = MagicMock() - post_mock_2.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("second", self._msg("[[A=B]]"))) - - # Use side_effect on server_mock.post to return different response mocks - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(side_effect=[post_mock_1, post_mock_2]) - - model_create_params = NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[{"role": "user", "content": "Q: 1+1?"}]) - model_response = NeMoGymResponse( - id="resp", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", - object="response", - output=[self._msg("It is 2.")], - parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", - tools=[], + body = self._create_verify_request_with_output([output_message]) + result = _extract_last_assistant_text(body) + assert result == "Part 1.\nPart 2." + + def test_extract_ignores_reasoning_items(self): + """Test that reasoning items are ignored.""" + output_items = [ + NeMoGymResponseReasoningItem( + id="reasoning_1", + summary=[NeMoGymSummary(type="summary_text", text="thinking...")], + ), + NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage( + id="msg_1", + content=[NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text="Actual response.")], + ), + ] + body = self._create_verify_request_with_output(output_items) + result = _extract_last_assistant_text(body) + assert result == "Actual response." + + def test_extract_empty_output(self): + """Test extracting from empty output.""" + body = self._create_verify_request_with_output([]) + result = _extract_last_assistant_text(body) + assert result == "" + + +class TestTerminusJudgeResourcesServerVerify: + """Tests for the TerminusJudgeResourcesServer.verify method.""" + + @fixture + def resources_server(self) -> TerminusJudgeResourcesServer: + """Create a TerminusJudgeResourcesServer instance for testing.""" + config = TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig( + host="127.0.0.1", + port=20002, + entrypoint="", + name="terminus_judge_test_server", + judge_model_server={"name": "test_judge", "type": "responses_api_models"}, + judge_responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming( + input=[NeMoGymEasyInputMessage(role="user", content="test")] + ), + string_similarity_threshold=0.8, ) - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=deepcopy(model_create_params), - response=model_response.model_copy(deep=True), - expected_answer="2", + with patch("builtins.open", MagicMock()): + server = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer( + config=config, + server_client=MagicMock(spec=ServerClient), + ) + server._judge_prompt_template = "Expected: {expected_answer}\nGenerated: {generated_answer}" + return server + + def _create_verify_request( + self, + model_output: str, + expected_answer: dict, + harness: str = "terminus_1", + threshold: float = None, + ) -> TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest: + """Helper to create a TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest.""" + output_message = NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage( + id="msg_1", + content=[NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text=model_output)], ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(1.0) - assert len(res.judge_evaluations) == 2 - assert res.judge_evaluations[0].verdict_label == "[[A=B]]" - assert res.judge_evaluations[1].verdict_label == "[[A=B]]" - - async def test_verify_not_equal_first(self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig) -> None: - """Test when first evaluation returns not equal.""" - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=config, server_client=server_mock) - - post_mock = MagicMock() - post_mock.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("f", self._msg("[[A!=B]]"))) - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(return_value=post_mock) - - model_create_params = NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[{"role": "user", "content": "Q: 1+1?"}]) - model_response = NeMoGymResponse( - id="resp", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", + response = NeMoGymResponse( + id="test_response", + created_at=1000, + model="test_model", object="response", - output=[self._msg("It is 3.")], + output=[output_message], parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", + tool_choice="auto", tools=[], ) - - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=deepcopy(model_create_params), - response=model_response.model_copy(deep=True), - expected_answer="2", - ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(0.0) - assert len(res.judge_evaluations) == 1 - assert res.judge_evaluations[0].verdict_label == "[[A!=B]]" - - async def test_unexpected_judge_output_defaults_to_not_equal( - self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig - ) -> None: - """Test that missing verdict labels default to not equal.""" - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=config, server_client=server_mock) - - post_mock = MagicMock() - post_mock.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("f", self._msg("no label present"))) - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(return_value=post_mock) - - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[]), - response=NeMoGymResponse( - id="r", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", - object="response", - output=[self._msg("text")], - parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", - tools=[], + return TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( + responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming( + input=[NeMoGymEasyInputMessage(role="user", content="test")] ), - expected_answer="x", + response=response, + expected_answer=json.dumps(expected_answer), + metadata={"harness": harness}, + threshold=threshold, ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(0.0) - assert res.judge_evaluations[0].verdict_label is None - - async def test_swap_fails_uses_configured_reward(self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig) -> None: - """Test that swap failure uses configured reward_if_swap_fails.""" - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - cfg = config.model_copy(deep=True) - cfg.check_twice_swap = True - cfg.reward_if_swap_fails = -1.0 - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=cfg, server_client=server_mock) - - # Create two separate response mocks for two separate POST calls - post_mock_1 = MagicMock() - post_mock_1.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("first", self._msg("[[A=B]]"))) - - post_mock_2 = MagicMock() - post_mock_2.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("second", self._msg("[[A!=B]]"))) - - # Use side_effect on server_mock.post to return different response mocks - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(side_effect=[post_mock_1, post_mock_2]) - - model_create_params = NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[{"role": "user", "content": "Q?"}]) - model_response = NeMoGymResponse( - id="resp", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", - object="response", - output=[self._msg("A")], - parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", - tools=[], + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_correct_prediction_terminus_1(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify returns reward=1.0 for correct terminus_1 prediction.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(expected_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 1.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.NONE + assert response.schema_check_passed is True + assert response.task_complete_check_passed is True + assert response.string_similarity_passed is True + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_correct_prediction_terminus_2(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify returns reward=1.0 for correct terminus_2 prediction.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_2_response([{"keystrokes": "ls -la\n"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(expected_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_2") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 1.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.NONE + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_with_think_tag(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify handles tag correctly.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "pwd"}]) + model_output = "Let me think..." + json.dumps(expected_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 1.0 + assert response.model_output == json.dumps(expected_answer) + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_json_parsing_failed(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify returns reward=0.0 for invalid JSON.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls"}]) + model_output = "not valid json" + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 0.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.JSON_PARSING_FAILED + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_unknown_harness(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify returns reward=0.0 for unknown harness.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(expected_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, harness="unknown") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 0.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.UNKNOWN_HARNESS + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_schema_check_failed_terminus_1(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify returns reward=0.0 for schema validation failure.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls"}]) + invalid_output = json.dumps({"commands": [{"keystrokes": "ls"}]}) + request = self._create_verify_request(invalid_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 0.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.SCHEMA_CHECK_FAILED + assert response.schema_check_passed is False + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_task_complete_check_failed(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify returns reward=0.0 when task_complete check fails.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls"}], is_task_complete=True) + pred_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls"}], is_task_complete=False) + model_output = json.dumps(pred_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 0.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.TASK_COMPLETE_CHECK_FAILED + assert response.task_complete_check_passed is False + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_string_similarity_below_threshold(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify invokes judge when string similarity is below threshold.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]) + pred_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "pwd"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(pred_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + # Mock judge to return not equal + mock_response = MagicMock() + mock_response.json = AsyncMock( + return_value={ + "id": "judge_resp", + "created_at": 1000, + "model": "judge", + "object": "response", + "output": [ + { + "id": "msg_judge", + "type": "message", + "role": "assistant", + "content": [{"type": "output_text", "text": "[[A!=B]]", "annotations": []}], + } + ], + "parallel_tool_calls": False, + "tool_choice": "auto", + "tools": [], + } ) - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=deepcopy(model_create_params), - response=model_response.model_copy(deep=True), - expected_answer="B", + resources_server.server_client.post = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_response) + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 0.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.JUDGE_EVALUATION_FAILED + assert response.string_similarity_passed is False + assert len(response.judge_evaluations) == 1 + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_judge_passes_without_swap(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify succeeds when judge passes without swap check.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]) + pred_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "completely different command"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(pred_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + # Mock judge to return equal + mock_response = MagicMock() + mock_response.json = AsyncMock( + return_value={ + "id": "judge_resp", + "created_at": 1000, + "model": "judge", + "object": "response", + "output": [ + { + "id": "msg_judge", + "type": "message", + "role": "assistant", + "content": [{"type": "output_text", "text": "[[A=B]]", "annotations": []}], + } + ], + "parallel_tool_calls": False, + "tool_choice": "auto", + "tools": [], + } ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(-1.0) - assert len(res.judge_evaluations) == 2 - - async def test_equal_label_appears_first(self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig) -> None: - """Test that when both labels appear, the first one wins.""" - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=config, server_client=server_mock) - - post_mock = MagicMock() - post_mock.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("f", self._msg("[[A=B]] some text [[A!=B]]"))) - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(return_value=post_mock) - - model_response = NeMoGymResponse( - id="resp", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", - object="response", - output=[self._msg("answer")], - parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", - tools=[], + resources_server.server_client.post = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_response) + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 1.0 + assert response.failure_reason == FailureCode.NONE + assert response.judge_passed is True + assert len(response.judge_evaluations) == 1 + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_judge_with_swap_check(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify with swap check enabled.""" + resources_server.config.check_twice_swap = True + + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls -la"}]) + pred_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "completely different command"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(pred_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1") + + # Mock judge to return equal for both calls + mock_response = MagicMock() + mock_response.json = AsyncMock( + return_value={ + "id": "judge_resp", + "created_at": 1000, + "model": "judge", + "object": "response", + "output": [ + { + "id": "msg_judge", + "type": "message", + "role": "assistant", + "content": [{"type": "output_text", "text": "[[A=B]]", "annotations": []}], + } + ], + "parallel_tool_calls": False, + "tool_choice": "auto", + "tools": [], + } ) + resources_server.server_client.post = AsyncMock(return_value=mock_response) + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) + + assert response.reward == 1.0 + assert response.judge_passed is True + assert len(response.judge_evaluations) == 2 + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_custom_threshold(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify uses custom threshold from request.""" + expected_answer = create_terminus_1_response([{"keystrokes": "ls"}]) + model_output = json.dumps(expected_answer) + request = self._create_verify_request(model_output, expected_answer, "terminus_1", threshold=0.9) + + response = await resources_server.verify(request) - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[]), - response=model_response, - expected_answer="expected", + assert response.threshold == 0.9 + assert response.reward == 1.0 + + @pytest.mark.asyncio + async def test_verify_missing_expected_answer(self, resources_server: TerminusJudgeResourcesServer): + """Test verify raises error when expected answer is missing.""" + output_message = NeMoGymResponseOutputMessage( + id="msg_1", + content=[NeMoGymResponseOutputText(annotations=[], text="test")], ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(1.0) - assert res.judge_evaluations[0].verdict_label == "[[A=B]]" - - async def test_not_equal_label_appears_first(self, config: TerminusJudgeResourcesServerConfig) -> None: - """Test that when not-equal appears first, it wins.""" - server_mock = MagicMock(spec=ServerClient) - rs = TerminusJudgeResourcesServer(config=config, server_client=server_mock) - - post_mock = MagicMock() - post_mock.json = AsyncMock(return_value=self._create_response("f", self._msg("[[A!=B]] some text [[A=B]]"))) - server_mock.post = AsyncMock(return_value=post_mock) - - model_response = NeMoGymResponse( - id="resp", - created_at=0.0, - model="m", + response = NeMoGymResponse( + id="test_response", + created_at=1000, + model="test_model", object="response", - output=[self._msg("answer")], + output=[output_message], parallel_tool_calls=False, - tool_choice="none", + tool_choice="auto", tools=[], ) - - req = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( - responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming(input=[]), - response=model_response, - expected_answer="expected", + request = TerminusJudgeVerifyRequest( + responses_create_params=NeMoGymResponseCreateParamsNonStreaming( + input=[NeMoGymEasyInputMessage(role="user", content="test")] + ), + response=response, ) - res = await rs.verify(req) - assert res.reward == approx(0.0) - assert res.judge_evaluations[0].verdict_label == "[[A!=B]]" + + with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Expected answer is required"): + await resources_server.verify(request)