-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tiago #155
Tiago #155
Conversation
API for generic Sensors
Text 2D Visualizations
[magnum]: remove deprecated functionality
Create a robot pool
Allow to "break" sensors
Stricter warnings and avoid warnings of external libs
[magnum]: do not use deprecated Magnum functions
I'll fix this. Do not worry.
Maybe a cylinder?
What do you mean are not working? There are no joints in the URDF? |
For the cylinder, does the dart collision checker works with cylinders? if so, yes, it's the same. I don't know if the wheels are joints, but I did not try to make the base move for now (at any rate, simulating wheels with a basic cylinder is rarely perfect) |
No it does not work. But boxes will not be able to make the wheels work.
They have a few examples in DART with cylinders for wheels. It will not be perfect. The other way would be to emulate the wheels with xy joints, but then we will lose interaction with the environment (e.g. going up small obstacles). |
Merging... |
Add the Tiago.
For now, we use STL & DAE, because when I convert to .glb I do not get the right orientation (and I tried to rotate, yes).
TODO: we should use a box for each wheel as collision shape, so that we have fast collision.
TODO: the wheels are not working for now